IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i1p289-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating center performance in the competing risks setting: Application to outcomes of wait†listed end†stage renal disease patients

Author

Listed:
  • Sai H. Dharmarajan
  • Douglas E. Schaubel
  • Rajiv Saran

Abstract

It is often of interest to compare centers or healthcare providers on quality of care delivered. We consider the setting where evaluation of center performance on multiple competing events is of interest. We propose estimating center effects through cause†specific proportional hazards frailty models that allow correlation among a center's cause†specific effects. Estimation of our model proceeds via penalized partial likelihood and is implemented in R. To evaluate center performance, we also propose a directly standardized excess cumulative incidence (ECI) measure. Therefore, based on our proposed methods, practitioners can evaluate centers either through the cause†specific hazards or the cumulative incidence functions. We demonstrate, through simulations, the advantages of the proposed methods to detect outlying centers, by comparing the proposed methods and existing methods which assume uncorrelated random center effects. In addition, we develop a Correlation Score Test to test the null hypothesis that the competing event processes within a center are correlated. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we apply our method to evaluate the performance of Organ Procurement Organizations on two competing risks: (i) receipt of a kidney transplant and (ii) death on the wait†list.

Suggested Citation

  • Sai H. Dharmarajan & Douglas E. Schaubel & Rajiv Saran, 2018. "Evaluating center performance in the competing risks setting: Application to outcomes of wait†listed end†stage renal disease patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 289-299, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:289-299
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malka Gorfine & Li Hsu, 2011. "Frailty-Based Competing Risks Model for Multivariate Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 415-426, June.
    2. Samuli Ripatti & Juni Palmgren, 2000. "Estimation of Multivariate Frailty Models Using Penalized Partial Likelihood," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1016-1022, December.
    3. Ludi Fan & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2016. "Comparing center-specific cumulative incidence functions," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 17-37, January.
    4. David Spiegelhalter & Christopher Sherlaw‐Johnson & Martin Bardsley & Ian Blunt & Christopher Wood & Olivia Grigg, 2012. "Statistical methods for healthcare regulation: rating, screening and surveillance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 175(1), pages 1-47, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lili Wang & Kevin He & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2020. "Penalized survival models for the analysis of alternating recurrent event data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 448-459, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Mengjiao & Xiang, Liming & Wang, Shanshan, 2018. "Semiparametric regression analysis of clustered survival data with semi-competing risks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 53-70.
    2. Il Do Ha & Maengseok Noh & Youngjo Lee, 2010. "Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 307-320, June.
    3. Guillaume Horny & Dragana Djurdjevic & Bernhard Boockmann & François Laisney, 2008. "Bayesian Estimation of Cox Models with Non-nested Random Effects: an Application to the Ratification Of ILO Conventions by Developing Countries," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 89, pages 193-214.
    4. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    5. Goele Massonnet & Paul Janssen & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2008. "Fitting Conditional Survival Models to Meta‐Analytic Data by Using a Transformation Toward Mixed‐Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 834-842, September.
    6. Jing Wang, 2019. "Weighted estimation for multivariate shared frailty models for complex surveys," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 469-479, July.
    7. Alexander Begun & Anatoli Yashin, 2019. "Study of the bivariate survival data using frailty models based on Lévy processes," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(1), pages 37-67, March.
    8. Wenjing Qi & Andrew S Allen & Yi-Ju Li, 2019. "Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Frank Eriksson & Thomas Scheike, 2015. "Additive gamma frailty models with applications to competing risks in related individuals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 677-686, September.
    10. Djeundje, Viani Biatat & Crook, Jonathan, 2018. "Incorporating heterogeneity and macroeconomic variables into multi-state delinquency models for credit cards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 697-709.
    11. Ungolo, Francesco & van den Heuvel, Edwin R., 2024. "A Dirichlet process mixture regression model for the analysis of competing risk events," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 95-113.
    12. Emanuel Krebs & Jeong E. Min & Elizabeth Evans & Libo Li & Lei Liu & David Huang & Darren Urada & Thomas Kerr & Yih-Ing Hser & Bohdan Nosyk, 2017. "Estimating State Transitions for Opioid Use Disorders," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(5), pages 483-497, July.
    13. Beaussier, Anne-Laure & Demeritt, David & Griffiths, Alex & Rothstein, Henry, 2020. "Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 501-510.
    14. Wang Hao & Cheng Yu, 2014. "Piecewise Cause-Specific Association Analyses of Multivariate Untied or Tied Competing Risks Data," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 197-220, November.
    15. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    16. Richard Tawiah & Geoffrey J. McLachlan & Shu Kay Ng, 2020. "A bivariate joint frailty model with mixture framework for survival analysis of recurrent events with dependent censoring and cure fraction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 753-766, September.
    17. Nicholas T. Longford, 2020. "Performance assessment as an application of causal inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1363-1385, October.
    18. Francesca Ieva & Anna Paganoni, 2015. "Detecting and visualizing outliers in provider profiling via funnel plots and mixed effect models," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 166-172, June.
    19. Rafael Pimentel Maia & Per Madsen & Rodrigo Labouriau, 2014. "Multivariate survival mixed models for genetic analysis of longevity traits," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 1286-1306, June.
    20. Johannes Hengelbrock & Johannes Rauh & Jona Cederbaum & Maximilian Kähler & Michael Höhle, 2023. "Hospital profiling using Bayesian decision theory," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2757-2769, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:289-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.