IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v78y2022i3p1141-1154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient detection and classification of epigenomic changes under multiple conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro L. Baldoni
  • Naim U. Rashid
  • Joseph G. Ibrahim

Abstract

Epigenomics, the study of the human genome and its interactions with proteins and other cellular elements, has become of significant interest in recent years. Such interactions have been shown to regulate essential cellular functions and are associated with multiple complex diseases. Therefore, understanding how these interactions may change across conditions is central in biomedical research. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel sequencing (ChIP‐seq) is one of several techniques to detect local changes in epigenomic activity (peaks). However, existing methods for differential peak calling are not optimized for the diversity in ChIP‐seq signal profiles, are limited to the analysis of two conditions, or cannot classify specific patterns of differential change when multiple patterns exist. To address these limitations, we present a flexible and efficient method for the detection of differential epigenomic activity across multiple conditions. We utilize data from the ENCODE Consortium and show that the presented method, epigraHMM, exhibits superior performance to current tools and it is among the fastest algorithms available, while allowing the classification of combinatorial patterns of differential epigenomic activity and the characterization of chromatin regulatory states.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro L. Baldoni & Naim U. Rashid & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2022. "Efficient detection and classification of epigenomic changes under multiple conditions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1141-1154, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:3:p:1141-1154
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13477
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Efron B. & Tibshirani R. & Storey J.D. & Tusher V., 2001. "Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1151-1160, December.
    2. Sanjeev Shukla & Ersen Kavak & Melissa Gregory & Masahiko Imashimizu & Bojan Shutinoski & Mikhail Kashlev & Philipp Oberdoerffer & Rickard Sandberg & Shalini Oberdoerffer, 2011. "CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing," Nature, Nature, vol. 479(7371), pages 74-79, November.
    3. Raphaël Margueron & Danny Reinberg, 2011. "The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7330), pages 343-349, January.
    4. Xiaoyu Liu & Chenfei Wang & Wenqiang Liu & Jingyi Li & Chong Li & Xiaochen Kou & Jiayu Chen & Yanhong Zhao & Haibo Gao & Hong Wang & Yong Zhang & Yawei Gao & Shaorong Gao, 2016. "Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos," Nature, Nature, vol. 537(7621), pages 558-562, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngchao Ge & Sandrine Dudoit & Terence Speed, 2003. "Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 1-77, June.
    2. Pounds Stanley B. & Gao Cuilan L. & Zhang Hui, 2012. "Empirical Bayesian Selection of Hypothesis Testing Procedures for Analysis of Sequence Count Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(5), pages 1-32, October.
    3. Niels Lundtorp Olsen & Alessia Pini & Simone Vantini, 2021. "False discovery rate for functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 784-809, September.
    4. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    5. Hossain, Ahmed & Beyene, Joseph & Willan, Andrew R. & Hu, Pingzhao, 2009. "A flexible approximate likelihood ratio test for detecting differential expression in microarray data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3685-3695, August.
    6. Dørum Guro & Snipen Lars & Solheim Margrete & Saebo Solve, 2011. "Smoothing Gene Expression Data with Network Information Improves Consistency of Regulated Genes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, August.
    7. Campbell R. Harvey & Yan Liu & Heqing Zhu, 2014. ". . . and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns," NBER Working Papers 20592, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Patrick Kline & Christopher Walters, 2019. "Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement," Papers 1907.06622, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    9. Daniel Yekutieli, 2015. "Bayesian tests for composite alternative hypotheses in cross-tabulated data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 287-301, June.
    10. Ghosh Debashis, 2012. "Incorporating the Empirical Null Hypothesis into the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Ruth Heller & Saharon Rosset, 2021. "Optimal control of false discovery criteria in the two‐group model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(1), pages 133-155, February.
    12. Marco D. Carpenter & Delaney K. Fischer & Shuo Zhang & Allison M. Bond & Kyle S. Czarnecki & Morgan T. Woolf & Hongjun Song & Elizabeth A. Heller, 2022. "Cell-type specific profiling of histone post-translational modifications in the adult mouse striatum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Debashis Ghosh & Arul Chinnaiyan, 2004. "Covariate adjustment in the analysis of microarray data from clinical studies," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1030, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    14. Yu Lianbo & Gulati Parul & Fernandez Soledad & Pennell Michael & Kirschner Lawrence & Jarjoura David, 2011. "Fully Moderated T-statistic for Small Sample Size Gene Expression Arrays," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Shengrui Feng & Sajid A. Marhon & Dustin J. Sokolowski & Alister D’Costa & Fraser Soares & Parinaz Mehdipour & Charles Ishak & Helen Loo Yau & Ilias Ettayebi & Parasvi S. Patel & Raymond Chen & Jiming, 2024. "Inhibiting EZH2 targets atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor by triggering viral mimicry via both RNA and DNA sensing pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Werft, W. & Benner, A. & Kopp-Schneider, A., 2012. "On the identification of predictive biomarkers: Detecting treatment-by-gene interaction in high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1275-1286.
    17. Sean Chang & James O. Berger, 2020. "Frequentist Properties of Bayesian Multiplicity Control for Multiple Testing of Normal Means," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 310-329, August.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13437 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Sairam Rayaprolu & Zhiyi Chi, 2021. "False Discovery Variance Reduction in Large Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Tests," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 711-733, September.
    20. Laurent Barras & Olivier Scaillet & Russ Wermers, 2010. "False Discoveries in Mutual Fund Performance: Measuring Luck in Estimated Alphas," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(1), pages 179-216, February.
    21. Kim, Donggyu & Zhang, Chunming, 2014. "Adaptive linear step-up multiple testing procedure with the bias-reduced estimator," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 31-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:3:p:1141-1154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.