IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v76y2020i3p799-810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

G‐estimation of structural nested restricted mean time lost models to estimate effects of time‐varying treatments on a failure time outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Yasuhiro Hagiwara
  • Tomohiro Shinozaki
  • Yutaka Matsuyama

Abstract

G‐estimation of structural nested models (SNMs) plays an important role in estimating the effects of time‐varying treatments with appropriate adjustment for time‐dependent confounding. As SNMs for a failure time outcome, structural nested accelerated failure time models (SNAFTMs) and structural nested cumulative failure time models have been developed. The latter models are included in the class of structural nested mean models (SNMMs) and are not involved in artificial censoring, which induces several difficulties in g‐estimation of SNAFTMs. Recently, restricted mean time lost (RMTL), which corresponds to the area under a distribution function up to a restriction time, is attracting attention in clinical trial communities as an appropriate summary measure of a failure time outcome. In this study, we propose another SNMM for a failure time outcome, which is called structural nested RMTL model (SNRMTLM) and describe randomized and observational g‐estimation procedures that use different assumptions for the treatment mechanism in a randomized trial setting. We also provide methods to estimate marginal RMTLs under static treatment regimes using estimated SNRMTLMs. A simulation study evaluates finite‐sample performances of the proposed methods compared with the conventional intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses. We illustrate the proposed methods using data from a randomized controlled trial for cardiovascular disease with treatment changes. G‐estimation of SNRMTLMs is a useful tool to estimate the effects of time‐varying treatments on a failure time outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasuhiro Hagiwara & Tomohiro Shinozaki & Yutaka Matsuyama, 2020. "G‐estimation of structural nested restricted mean time lost models to estimate effects of time‐varying treatments on a failure time outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 799-810, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:799-810
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl Mertens & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2018. "Augmented and doubly robust G†estimation of causal effects under a Structural nested failure time model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 472-480, June.
    2. Judith J. Lok & Victor DeGruttola, 2012. "Impact of Time to Start Treatment Following Infection with Application to Initiating HAART in HIV-Positive Patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 745-754, September.
    3. Masataka Taguri & Yutaka Matsuyama & Yasuo Ohashi, 2014. "Model selection criterion for causal parameters in structural mean models based on a quasi-likelihood," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 721-730, September.
    4. Sally Picciotto & Miguel A. Hernán & John H. Page & Jessica G. Young & James M. Robins, 2012. "Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Models to Estimate the Effects of Interventions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 886-900, September.
    5. S. Yang & J. J. Lok, 2016. "A goodness-of-fit test for structural nested mean models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 734-741.
    6. Lihui Zhao & Brian Claggett & Lu Tian & Hajime Uno & Marc A. Pfeffer & Scott D. Solomon & Lorenzo Trippa & L. J. Wei, 2016. "On the restricted mean survival time curve in survival analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 215-221, March.
    7. Pei-Yun Chen & Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2001. "Causal Inference on the Difference of the Restricted Mean Lifetime Between Two Groups," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1030-1038, December.
    8. Xin Wang & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2018. "Modeling restricted mean survival time under general censoring mechanisms," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 176-199, January.
    9. Min Zhang & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2012. "Double-Robust Semiparametric Estimator for Differences in Restricted Mean Lifetimes in Observational Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 999-1009, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingchao Zhong & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2022. "Restricted mean survival time as a function of restriction time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 192-201, March.
    2. Chi Hyun Lee & Jing Ning & Yu Shen, 2018. "Analysis of restricted mean survival time for length†biased data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 575-583, June.
    3. Iván Díaz & Elizabeth Colantuoni & Daniel F. Hanley & Michael Rosenblum, 2019. "Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 439-468, July.
    4. Shu Yang, 2022. "Semiparametric estimation of structural nested mean models with irregularly spaced longitudinal observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 937-949, September.
    5. Zijing Yang & Chengfeng Zhang & Yawen Hou & Zheng Chen, 2023. "Analysis of dynamic restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3690-3700, December.
    6. Qi Gong & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2017. "Estimating the average treatment effect on survival based on observational data and using partly conditional modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 134-144, March.
    7. Zhiwei Zhang & Wei Li & Hui Zhang, 2020. "Efficient Estimation of Mann–Whitney-Type Effect Measures for Right-Censored Survival Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 246-262, July.
    8. Lu Mao, 2023. "On restricted mean time in favor of treatment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 61-72, March.
    9. Xin Wang & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2018. "Modeling restricted mean survival time under general censoring mechanisms," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 176-199, January.
    10. Douglas E. Schaubel & Guanghui Wei, 2011. "Double Inverse-Weighted Estimation of Cumulative Treatment Effects Under Nonproportional Hazards and Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 29-38, March.
    11. H. Michael & L. Tian, 2017. "Discussion of “A risk-based measure of time-varying prognostic discrimination for survival models,” by C. Jason Liang and Patrick J. Heagerty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 735-738, September.
    12. Lu Tian & Hua Jin & Hajime Uno & Ying Lu & Bo Huang & Keaven M. Anderson & LJ Wei, 2020. "On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1157-1166, December.
    13. Vasilis Syrgkanis & Ruohan Zhan, 2023. "Post Reinforcement Learning Inference," Papers 2302.08854, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    14. Layla Parast & Beth Ann Griffin, 2017. "Landmark estimation of survival and treatment effects in observational studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 161-182, April.
    15. Yu-Jen Cheng & Mei-Cheng Wang, 2015. "Causal estimation using semiparametric transformation models under prevalent sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 302-312, June.
    16. David Benkeser & Iván Díaz & Alex Luedtke & Jodi Segal & Daniel Scharfstein & Michael Rosenblum, 2021. "Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID‐19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time‐to‐event outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1467-1481, December.
    17. Ross L. Prentice, 2022. "On the targets of inference with multivariate failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 546-559, October.
    18. Ruosha Li & Limin Peng, 2017. "Assessing quantile prediction with censored quantile regression models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 517-528, June.
    19. Yifan He & Yong Zhou, 2020. "Nonparametric and semiparametric estimators of restricted mean survival time under length-biased sampling," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 761-788, October.
    20. Xin Chen & Rui Song & Jiajia Zhang & Swann Arp Adams & Liuquan Sun & Wenbin Lu, 2022. "On estimating optimal regime for treatment initiation time based on restricted mean residual lifetime," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1377-1389, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:799-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.