IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i2p538-547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental design for multi†drug combination studies using signaling networks

Author

Listed:
  • Hengzhen Huang
  • Hong†Bin Fang
  • Ming T. Tan

Abstract

Combinations of multiple drugs are an important approach to maximize the chance for therapeutic success by inhibiting multiple pathways/targets. Analytic methods for studying drug combinations have received increasing attention because major advances in biomedical research have made available large number of potential agents for testing. The preclinical experiment on multi†drug combinations plays a key role in (especially cancer) drug development because of the complex nature of the disease, the need to reduce development time and costs. Despite recent progresses in statistical methods for assessing drug interaction, there is an acute lack of methods for designing experiments on multi†drug combinations. The number of combinations grows exponentially with the number of drugs and dose†levels and it quickly precludes laboratory testing. Utilizing experimental dose–response data of single drugs and a few combinations along with pathway/network information to obtain an estimate of the functional structure of the dose–response relationship in silico, we propose an optimal design that allows exploration of the dose–effect surface with the smallest possible sample size in this article. The simulation studies show our proposed methods perform well.

Suggested Citation

  • Hengzhen Huang & Hong†Bin Fang & Ming T. Tan, 2018. "Experimental design for multi†drug combination studies using signaling networks," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 538-547, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:538-547
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12777
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guosheng Yin & Ying Yuan, 2009. "A Latent Contingency Table Approach to Dose Finding for Combinations of Two Agents," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 866-875, September.
    2. Maiying Kong & J. Jack Lee, 2006. "A Generalized Response Surface Model with Varying Relative Potency for Assessing Drug Interaction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 986-995, December.
    3. Wiens, Douglas P., 1991. "Designs for approximately linear regression: two optimality properties of uniform designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 217-221, September.
    4. Guosheng Yin & Ying Yuan, 2009. "Bayesian dose finding in oncology for drug combinations by copula regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 211-224, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koichi Hashizume & Jun Tshuchida & Takashi Sozu, 2022. "Flexible use of copula‐type model for dose‐finding in drug combination clinical trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1651-1661, December.
    2. Nolan A. Wages & Mark R. Conaway & John O'Quigley, 2011. "Continual Reassessment Method for Partial Ordering," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1555-1563, December.
    3. Huang, Hengzhen & Chen, Xueping, 2021. "Compromise design for combination experiment of two drugs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Márcio A. Diniz & Sungjin Kim & Mourad Tighiouart, 2020. "A Bayesian Adaptive Design in Cancer Phase I Trials Using Dose Combinations with Ordinal Toxicity Grades," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Beibei Guo & Elizabeth Garrett‐Mayer & Suyu Liu, 2021. "A Bayesian phase I/II design for cancer clinical trials combining an immunotherapeutic agent with a chemotherapeutic agent," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1210-1229, November.
    6. Thomas M. Braun, 2018. "Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 1065-1071, September.
    7. Renata Eirini Tsirpitzi & Frank Miller & Carl-Fredrik Burman, 2023. "Robust optimal designs using a model misspecification term," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 86(7), pages 781-804, October.
    8. Chunyan Cai & Ying Yuan & Yuan Ji, 2014. "A Bayesian dose finding design for oncology clinical trials of combinational biological agents," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 159-173, January.
    9. Beibei Guo & Suyu Liu, 2018. "Optimal Benchmark for Evaluating Drug-Combination Dose-Finding Clinical Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(1), pages 184-201, April.
    10. Wiens, Douglas P., 2010. "Robustness of design for the testing of lack of fit and for estimation in binary response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3371-3378, December.
    11. Xiaojian Xu & Xiaoli Shang, 2017. "D-optimal designs for full and reduced Fourier regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 811-829, September.
    12. Bischoff, Wolfgang & Miller, Frank, 2006. "Lack-of-fit-efficiently optimal designs to estimate the highest coefficient of a polynomial with large degree," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(15), pages 1701-1704, September.
    13. Dette, Holger & Wiens, Douglas P., 2007. "Robust designs for 3D shape analysis with spherical harmonic descriptors," Technical Reports 2007,12, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    14. Maiying Kong & J. Jack Lee, 2008. "A Semiparametric Response Surface Model for Assessing Drug Interaction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 396-405, June.
    15. Biedermann, Stefanie & Dette, Holger, 2000. "Optimal designs for testing the functional form of a regression via nonparametric estimation techniques," Technical Reports 2000,41, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    16. Fadoua Balabdaoui & Cécile Durot & Hanna Jankowski, 2023. "Behaviour of the Monotone Single Index Model Under Repeated Measurements," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 324-350, February.
    17. Ramón Ardanuy & J. López-Fidalgo & Patrick Laycock & Weng Wong, 1999. "When is an Equally-Weighted Design D-optimal?," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 51(3), pages 531-540, September.
    18. Mauro Gasparini & Stuart Bailey & Beat Neuenschwander, 2010. "Bayesian dose finding in oncology for drug combinations by copula regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 543-544, May.
    19. Linglong Kong & Douglas P. Wiens, 2015. "Model-Robust Designs for Quantile Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 233-245, March.
    20. Mandal, Nripes Kumar & Pal, Manisha, 2013. "Maximin designs for the detection of synergistic effects," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(7), pages 1632-1637.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:2:p:538-547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.