IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v63y2024i2p370-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What sorts of public value are Thai public business schools aiming to realise?

Author

Listed:
  • Nattawoot Koowattanatianchai
  • Michael B. Charles
  • Michael A. Kortt

Abstract

This study examines the types of public value that Thai public business schools aim to realise. The study draws on publicly available data relating to the mission statements of these schools and follows a recognised research approach for analysing data from mission statements. It also compared these results to those found in Thai private universities, as well as in Australian universities, where a similar study has recently been undertaken. Our results indicate that there are currently four distinct types of public business schools in Thailand based on their public value propositions: Society‐oriented Schools, Graduate‐producing Schools, Socially‐responsible Leadership Schools, and Internationally‐oriented Schools. While the first two concentrate on creating value for Thai society and businesses, the latter two concentrate on more holistic outcomes, have less of a Thailand‐centric focus, and are more likely to be members of international accreditation bodies. An analysis of the private schools provided broadly similar outcomes, likely because both public and private universities are subjected to the same political and cultural expectations. In an increasingly competitive business education market, some Thai public business schools may shift from simply supplying graduates to Thai businesses to embracing more globally relevant public value propositions, especially if they wish to pursue international accreditation. A greater emphasis on engagement and working with professional bodies will also likely be essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Nattawoot Koowattanatianchai & Michael B. Charles & Michael A. Kortt, 2024. "What sorts of public value are Thai public business schools aiming to realise?," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 370-402, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:63:y:2024:i:2:p:370-402
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.12325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12325
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.12325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owen Hogan & Michael A. Kortt & Michael B. Charles, 2021. "Mission Impossible? Are Australian Business Schools Creating Public Value?," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 280-289, March.
    2. David Noble & Michael B. Charles & Robyn Keast, 2017. "New development: Towards a collaborative competency framework to enhance public value in university– industry collaboration," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 373-378, July.
    3. Braun, Susanne & Wesche, Jenny S & Frey, Dieter & Weisweiler, Silke & Peus, Claudia, 2012. "Effectiveness of mission statements in organizations – A review," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 430-444, July.
    4. Chitralada Chaiya & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad, 2021. "Success or Failure of the Thai Higher Education Development—Critical Factors in the Policy Process of Quality Assurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego F. Téllez & Jesús M. Godoy, 2017. "Mission Power and Firm Financial Performance," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 15655, Universidad EAFIT.
    2. Giorgio Mion & Cristian Rolando Loza Adaui & Angelo Bonfanti, 2021. "Characterizing the mission statements of benefit corporations: Empirical evidence from Italy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2160-2172, May.
    3. Riff Raymond Guia & Carlos Eduardo Legaspi Jr, 2023. "Practice of Lasallian values and leadership skills of Lay Administrators in Lasallian Educational Institutions," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 43(1), pages 189-204, May.
    4. Chijioke Nwachukwu & Pavel Žufan, 2017. "Influence of Customer Focused Mission Statement on Customer Satisfaction," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(3), pages 1031-1038.
    5. Paul Saah, 2022. "Critical Factors for the Successful Implementation of a Strategic Business Plan among Small and Medium Size Enterprises," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 19-28, July.
    6. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Lin, Feng-Jyh & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "The effect of social mission on service quality and brand image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 744-752.
    7. Mion, Giorgio & Loza Adaui, Cristian R. & Bonfanti, Angelo & De Crescenzo, Veronica, 2023. "Mission statements and financial and sustainability performance: An exploratory study of Benefit Corporations certified as B Corps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Michelle Shumate & Jiawei Sophia Fu & Katherine R. Cooper, 2018. "Does Cross-Sector Collaboration Lead to Higher Nonprofit Capacity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 385-399, June.
    9. TOH Seong-Yuen & KOON Vui-Yee, 2017. "Determining Mission Statement Effectiveness From A Fit Perspective," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 220-240, August.
    10. Valentina A. Bali & Devin Higgins, 2023. "More than Meets the Eye? Using Text Analytic Techniques to Unpack School Mission Statements," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:63:y:2024:i:2:p:370-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.