IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v42y2003i4p399-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Travel Cost Models And The Precision Of Their Consumer Surplus Estimates: Albert Park And Maroondah Reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Lansdell
  • Lata Gangadharan

Abstract

This study examines different types of Travel Cost Models to estimate and compare the recreational values of two parks in Victoria, Australia: Maroondah Reservoir and Albert Park. Zonal Travel Cost models and a number of different functional forms are used in this study. Standard errors are used to estimate upper and lower bounds for the recreational value estimates, enabling comparison between the precision of the different types of Travel Cost Models and functional forms estimated. The double log functional form city zone Travel Cost Model was chosen as the best estimate for Albert Park's recrea‐tional value at $22.9 million per year. Maroondah Reservoir's best estimate is provided by the double log functional form regional zone Travel Cost Model at a value of $2.5 million per year, consider‐ably less than that of Albert Park. Albert Park is found to have a comparatively larger ‘proximity power’ (attracting many more visitors) while Maroondah Reservoir exhibited a larger degree of ‘pulling power’ (a higher proportion of its visitors travel further distances).

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Lansdell & Lata Gangadharan, 2003. "Comparing Travel Cost Models And The Precision Of Their Consumer Surplus Estimates: Albert Park And Maroondah Reservoir," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 399-417, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:42:y:2003:i:4:p:399-417
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.00207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.00207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Hanley & Clive L. Spash, 1993. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 205.
    2. Gillespie, Robert, 1997. "Economic Value and Regional Economic Impact of Minnamurra Rainforest Centre, Budderoo National Park," 1997 Conference (41st), January 22-24, 1997, Gold Coast, Australia 136013, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Christine Seller & John R. Stoll & Jean-Paul Chavas, 1985. "Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 62(2), pages 156-175.
    4. V. K. Smith, 1996. "Estimating Economic Values for Nature," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 734.
    5. P. Geoffrey Allen & Thomas H. Stevens & Scott A. Barrett, 1981. "The Effects of Variable Omission in the Travel Cost Technique," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(2), pages 173-180.
    6. Robert D. Laurent & J. Bradford De Long & George Bredon & Martin Shanahan & Carl S. Bonham & Richard H. Cohen, 2000. "Correspondence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 225-230, Fall.
    7. Beal, Diana J., 1995. "A Travel Cost Analysis of the Value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for Recreational Use," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(02), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Pearce, David, 1992. "Economic valuation and the natural world," Policy Research Working Paper Series 988, The World Bank.
    9. Chotikapanich, Duangkamon & Griffiths, William E., 1998. "Carnarvon Gorge: a comment on the sensitivity of consumer surplus estimation," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(3), pages 1-13.
    10. Kenneth E. McConnell, 1975. "Some Problems in Estimating the Demand for Outdoor Recreation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(2), pages 330-334.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heagney, E.C. & Rose, J.M. & Ardeshiri, A. & Kovač, M., 2018. "Optimising recreation services from protected areas – Understanding the role of natural values, built infrastructure and contextual factors," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 358-370.
    2. Zandi Solmaz & Limaei Soleiman Mohammadi & Amiri Neda, 2018. "An economic evaluation of a forest park using the individual travel cost method (a case study of Ghaleh Rudkhan forest park in northern Iran)," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 48-55, June.
    3. Pramod Lamsal & Kishor Atreya & Krishna Prasad Pant & Lalit Kumar, 2016. "Tourism and wetland conservation: application of travel cost and willingness to pay an entry fee at Ghodaghodi Lake Complex, Nepal," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1-2), pages 51-61, February.
    4. Lavee, D. & Menachem, O., 2018. "Economic valuation of the existence of the southwestern basin of the Dead Sea in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 160-169.
    5. Baker, Rick & Ruting, Brad, 2014. "Environmental Policy Analysis: A Guide to Non‑Market Valuation," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165810, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. M. Pirikiya & H. Amirnejad & J. Oladi & K. Ataie Solout, 2016. "Determining the recreational value of forest park by travel cost method and defining its effective factors," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(9), pages 399-406.
    7. Muhammad Rafiq & Shafiqullah, 2007. "Demand Analysis of Recreation Visits to Chitral Valley: A Natural Resource Management Perspective," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 971-984.
    8. Himayatullah Khan, 2006. "Willingness to Pay for Margalla Hills National Park: Evidence from the Travel Cost Method," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 43-70, Jul-Dec.
    9. Giovanni B Concu, 2009. "Measuring Environmental Externality Spillovers through Choice Modelling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 199-212, January.
    10. Saúl Torres-Ortega & Rubén Pérez-Álvarez & Pedro Díaz-Simal & Julio Manuel De Luis-Ruiz & Felipe Piña-García, 2018. "Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Application of Travel Cost Method to the National Museum and Research Center of Altamira," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    11. Himayatullah, 2003. "Economic Valuation of the Environment and the Travel Cost Approach: The Case of Ayubia National Park," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 537-551.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Rafiq & Shafiqullah, 2007. "Demand Analysis of Recreation Visits to Chitral Valley: A Natural Resource Management Perspective," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 971-984.
    2. Liao, Chih-Chien & Houston, Jack E., Jr. & Bergstrom, John C., 1989. "Recreation Demand Factor Indices: A Principal Components Analysis," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270497, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Prabha Prayaga & John Rolfe & Jack Sinden, 2006. "A Travel Cost Analysis of the Value of Special Events: Gemfest in Central Queensland," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(3), pages 403-420, September.
    4. Bennett, Jeffrey W., 2005. "Australasian environmental economics: contributions, conflicts and ‘cop-outs’," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(3), pages 1-19.
    5. Paula Simões & Luís Cruz & Eduardo Barata, 2012. "Non-market Recreational Value of a National Forest: Survey Design and Results," GEMF Working Papers 2012-09, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    6. Rolfe, John & Dyack, Brenda, 2010. "Testing for convergent validity between travel cost and contingent valuation estimates of recreation values in the Coorong, Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-17.
    7. Adan L. Martinez Cruz & Yadira Elizabeth Peralta Torres & Valeria Garcia Olivera, 2024. "Using stated preference responses to address endogeneity in the single site travel cost equation," Working Papers DTE 632, CIDE, División de Economía.
    8. Garcia, Cristina, 1982. "Problems With The Treatment Of Time In The Travel Cost Method," Staff Papers 13408, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Read, Michael & Sinden, Jack A. & Branson, Jane & Sturgess, Neil H., 1999. "Recreational use values for Victoria’s Parks," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 124541, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Star, Megan & Rolfe, John & Brown, Julia, 2020. "From farm to fork: Is food tourism a sustainable form of economic development?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 325-334.
    11. Liao, Chin-Chien & Houston, Jack E. & Bergstrom, John C., 1989. "The Use of Principle Components Analysis," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 245034, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. de Frutos, Pablo & Rodríguez-Prado, Beatriz & Latorre, Joaquín & Martínez-Peña, Fernando, 2019. "Environmental valuation and management of wild edible mushroom picking in Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 177-187.
    13. Zandi Solmaz & Limaei Soleiman Mohammadi & Amiri Neda, 2018. "An economic evaluation of a forest park using the individual travel cost method (a case study of Ghaleh Rudkhan forest park in northern Iran)," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 48-55, June.
    14. S. Mohammadi Limaei & H. Ghesmati & R. Rashidi & N. Yamini, 2014. "Economic evaluation of natural forest park using the travel cost method (case study; Masouleh forest park, north of Iran)," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 254-261.
    15. Easter, K. William & Archibald, Sandra O., 1998. "Benefit-Cost Analysis In U.S. Environmental Regulatory Decisions," Conference Papers 14475, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    16. Wai Soe Zin & Aya Suzuki & Kelvin S.-H. Peh & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2019. "Economic Value of Cultural Ecosystem Services from Recreation in Popa Mountain National Park, Myanmar: A Comparison of Two Rapid Valuation Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Jose M. Martínez-Paz & Angel Perni & Federico Martínez-Carrasco, 2013. "Assessment of the Programme of Measures for Coastal Lagoon Environmental Restoration Using Cost--Benefit Analysis," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 131-148, February.
    18. Larson, Douglas & Shaikh, Sabina, 1999. "Empirical Specification Requirements for Two-Constraint Models of Recreation Demand," Western Region Archives 321713, Western Region - Western Extension Directors Association (WEDA).
    19. Karine Nyborg & Inger Spangen, 2000. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Democratic Ideal," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 26, pages 83-93.
    20. Mogaka, Violet Moraa & Mbatia, O.L.E. & Nzuma, Jonathan M., 2012. "Feasibility of Biofuel Production in Kenya: The Case of Jatropha," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126427, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:42:y:2003:i:4:p:399-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.