IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v35y2006i3p363-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the uncertainty in estimates of the economic impacts of Bovine‐Leukosis virus in U.S. dairy cows

Author

Listed:
  • Willard C. Losinger

Abstract

An examination of the economic impacts of Bovine‐Leukosis virus indicated that reduced milk production, attributed to the presence of Bovine‐Leukosis virus in dairy cows, reduced consumer surplus by 2.7 ± 2.3 billion US$ (bUS$), and resulted in a total partial equilibrium loss of 720 ± 560 million US$ (mUS$) to the U.S. economy in 1996. Most of the economic surplus lost by consumers was transferred to producers, whose economic surplus increased by 2.0 ± 1.8 bUS$ as a result of reduced milk production attributed to the presence of Bovine‐Leukosis virus in dairy cattle. Uncertainty analysis showed that an estimate of the milk‐production decline per percent increase in the prevalence of Bovine‐Leukosis virus in dairy cows accounted for most of the uncertainty in the economic‐impact estimates. If Bovine‐Leukosis virus had not been present in U.S. dairy cows, then milk production would have increased by 2.0 billion ± 1.5 billion kg, the price would have fallen by 3.8 ± 3.2 cents/kg, and the value of the milk produced would have decreased by 2.1 ± 1.9 bUS$. Guidelines delineated by the International Organization for Standardization, for evaluating and expressing uncertainty in measurement, are discussed and proposed for use in the context of broad national estimates, for which the economic impacts of Bovine‐Leukosis virus serve as an example. The principal advantages of the methodology are the clarity and transparency of results, and the ability clearly to identify major uncertainty contributors.

Suggested Citation

  • Willard C. Losinger, 2006. "Evaluating the uncertainty in estimates of the economic impacts of Bovine‐Leukosis virus in U.S. dairy cows," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 35(3), pages 363-372, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:35:y:2006:i:3:p:363-372
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00168.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00168.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00168.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Losinger W.C., 2004. "A Review of the GUM Workbench," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pages 165-167, May.
    2. Nicholas E. Piggott, 2003. "Measures of precision for estimated welfare effects for producers from generic advertising," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 379-391.
    3. Xueyan Zhao & John D. Mullen & Gary R. Griffith, 1997. "Functional Forms, Exogenous Shifts, and Economic Surplus Changes," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1243-1251.
    4. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal & Le Roy, Danny G., 1996. "Analyzing The Potential For Increased Trade In Dairy Products: A Canadian Perspective," Proceedings of the 2nd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1996: Understanding Canada\United States Dairy Disputes 16959, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    5. Kenneth W. Forsythe & Barbara Corso, 1994. "Welfare Effects of the National Pseudorabies Eradication Program: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(4), pages 968-971.
    6. Adesoji O. Adelaja, 1991. "Price Changes, Supply Elasticities, Industry Organization, and Dairy Output Distribution," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 89-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tauer, Loren W., 1998. "Estimates Of Individual Dairy Farm Supply Elasticities," Working Papers 14745, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Liu, Min & Jikun, Huang, 2018. "The Asymmetric Response of Farmers to the Expected Change of Rubber Price: the Roles of Sunk Cost and Path Dependency," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274122, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Sumner, Daniel A. & Hallstrom, Daniel G., 1997. "Commodity Policy Compatibility With Free Trade Agreements," Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1997: Harmonization\Convergence\Compatibility in Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy: Canada, United States and Mexico 16914, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    4. Dent, Siobahn K. & Piggott, Roley R. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "Does Excluding Cross-commodity Interactions Matter? Beef and Lamb in Australia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57859, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Ronald D. Knutson & Robert Romain & David P. Anderson & James W. Richardson, 1997. "Farm-Level Consequences of Canadian and U.S. Dairy Policies," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 45(4), pages 421-432, December.
    6. Metin Cakir & Joseph V. Balagtas, 2010. "Econometric evidence of cross-market effects of generic dairy advertising," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 83-99.
    7. Vavra, Pavel & Colman, David, 2003. "The analysis of UK crop allocation at the farm level: implications for supply response analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 697-713, May.
    8. Abigail M. Okrent & Julian M. Alston, 2012. "The Effects of Farm Commodity and Retail Food Policies on Obesity and Economic Welfare in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(3), pages 611-646.
    9. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Uncertainties Of Estimating The Welfare Effects Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union," Working Papers 31828, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    10. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun, 2018. "The asymmetric response of farmers to an expected change in the price of rubber: The roles of sunk costs and path dependency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 585-594.
    11. Zhao, Xueyan & Griffiths, William E. & Griffith, Garry R. & Mullen, John D., 2000. "Probability distributions for economic surplus changes: the case of technical change in the Australian wool industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-24.
    12. Shewmake, Sharon & Okrent, Abigail & Thabrew, Lanka & Vandenbergh, Michael, 2015. "Predicting consumer demand responses to carbon labels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 168-180.
    13. Barichello, Richard R. & Romain, Robert F.J., 1996. "Prospects For The Canadian Dairy Sector Following The Upcoming Nafta Panel Ruling," Proceedings of the 2nd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1996: Understanding Canada\United States Dairy Disputes 16953, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    14. Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Miller, Tracy & Taslim, Mohammad, 1998. "Land Values, Market Forces, and Declining Dairy Herd Size: Evidence from an Urban-Influenced Region," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 63-71, April.
    15. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R., 2001. "Some Practical Issues in Economic Surplus Measurement in Multi-Market Models," 2001 Conference (45th), January 23-25, 2001, Adelaide, Australia 126067, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Unknown, 1998. "Commodity Costs and Returns Estimation Handbook (entire book-condensed file)," Commodity Costs and Returns Estimation Handbook,, Iowa State University.
    17. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Fleming, Euan M. & Zhao, Xueyan, 2008. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Sheep and Wool Industries," Research Reports 37663, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    18. Unknown, 1998. "References/Literature Cited," Commodity Costs and Returns Estimation Handbook,, Iowa State University.
    19. Caroline Saunders & Selim Cagatay, 2003. "Commercial release of first‐generation genetically modified food products in New Zealand: using a partial equilibrium trade model to assess the impact on producer returns in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(2), pages 233-259, June.
    20. Howard Doran, 1993. "Testing Nonnested Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 95-103.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:35:y:2006:i:3:p:363-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.