IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v7y2017i1p12-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact factors of knowledge sharing intention of it employees in Vietnam – An integrated approach

Author

Listed:
  • Pham Quoc Trung

    (Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University, HCMC, Vietnam)

  • Ho Ba Thang

    (FIS –ERP CO., LTD, Vietnam)

Abstract

In the knowledge era, knowledge sharing has been becoming an essential issue to knowledge-based organizations, such as IT businesses. However, knowledge sharing among workers in IT organizations is not efficient in reality. Especially, in a developing country like Vietnam, there is a lack of research in this topic. Therefore, this research tries to identify and to measure the impact of those factors on the knowledge sharing intention of employees in the IT industry. Unlike previous studies, this research integrated factors of Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and other factors of the organization environment and ICT to explore their impacts on knowledge sharing intention. Using Convenience sampling method, 257 valid samplings were collected from organizations in IT industry in HCMC. The scale was tested by Cronbach’s Alpha, EFA analysis methods. Based on regression analysis, the factor affecting knowledge sharing intention of employees was sorted by descending order, including: affiliation and innovativeness in an organization, attitude towards knowledge and subjective norms, perceived behavioral control. Besides, the knowledge sharing intention of employees is also indirectly affected by factors: anticipated reciprocal relationship and fairness in organization and support of ICT. The results of the ANOVA analysis show that there is a marked difference in knowledge sharing intention between managers and employees. Based on these results, some suggestions for facilitating knowledge sharing between employees in IT industry are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham Quoc Trung & Ho Ba Thang, 2017. "Impact factors of knowledge sharing intention of it employees in Vietnam – An integrated approach," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 7(1), pages 12-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:12-23
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.7.1.193.2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/193/159
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.7.1.193.2017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renata Borges, 2012. "Tacit knowledge sharing between IT workers: The role of organizational culture, personality, and social environment," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 36(1), pages 89-108, December.
    2. Ming-Tien Tsai & Hsiu-Ching Chang & Nai-Chang Cheng & Chung-Chang Lien, 2013. "Understanding IT professionals’ knowledge sharing intention through KMS: a social exchange perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2739-2753, August.
    3. Jianwei Zhang & Yuxin Liu, 2010. "Organizational Climate and its Effects on Organizational Variables: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 189-189, December.
    4. Quoc Trung Pham & Yoshinori Hara, 2011. "KM Approach for Improving the Labor Productivity of Vietnamese Enterprise," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 27-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Supriya Kumar Ghatak & Biswajit Mahanty, 2021. "Evaluating intra-project knowledge growth and its effect on co-located software team output," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1727-1750, October.
    2. Cletus Helen Eboh, 2019. "Evaluation of the Conceptual Theories, Elements, and Processes of Knowledge Management in Modern Day Organisations," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 37-54, April.
    3. Ngoc Anh Nguyen & Quoc Trung Pham, 2021. "The Impacts of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Transfer Between Japanese Managers and Vietnamese Employees in Japanese Enterprises," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Ferrón Vílchez, Vera & Senise Barrio, María Eugenia & Llamas Sánchez, Rocío, 2024. "The reciprocity of perceived organizational support and employee engagement in SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic," Small Business International Review, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas - AECA, vol. 8(1), pages 611-611, May.
    5. Leon, Ramona – Diana & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Raúl & Gómez-Gasquet, Pedro & Mula, Josefa, 2017. "Social network analysis: A tool for evaluating and predicting future knowledge flows from an insurance organization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 103-118.
    6. Debasisha Mishra & M. Ramkumar, 2022. "Study of project type and team structure in the Indian software outsourcing industry," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 324-349, March.
    7. Adeleke Oladapo Banwo & Uchechi Onokala & Bola Momoh, 2022. "Organizational climate–institutional environment nexus: why context matters," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 357-369, December.
    8. Jiahe Chen & Yi-Chen Lan & Yu-Wei Chang & Po-Ya Chang, 2019. "Exploring Doctors’ Willingness to Provide Online Counseling Services: The Roles of Motivations and Costs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:12-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.