IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v7y2020i5p45-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Motivation Factors on the Job Performance: A Case Study of Dangote Cement and Lafarge Cement Companies in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Eko Oluwajuwon Toheeb

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

  • Abdoul Rahman Mhd Al Jounaidi

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

  • Maged Mustafa Al-Dubai

    (Department of Management, Al-Madina International University, Kualalumpur-Malaysia)

Abstract

Human resources that are the backbone of catering for staff in an organization are needed by motivating the organization to prepare for a sustainable competitive advantage. Due to the highly dynamic and competitive business climate in which organizations, they need to establish strategies for recruiting and retaining the required staff, thereby motivating their employee. The development of strategies then makes the motivation to be the critical factor that is needed to create an enabling environment that aids optimal job performance of an employee in an organization. A productive workforce is the cornerstone of any organization, facilitating in a competitive environment the achievement of regulatory targets. Such methods or motivating factors are used by managers to increase employee productivity. Therefore, this research seeks to compare some of these motivation factors which include compensation, incentive, benefits, and reward on job performance in some organizations in Nigeria which are Lafarge and Dangote cement which are the most popular cement companies in Nigeria. This is study tries to determine the difference in the effect of factors (benefit, incentive, reward, compensation) on the job performance at Dangote cement and Lafarge cement. In this study, the analysis of the collected data is carried out using the Social Sciences Statistics System (SPSS). As descriptive statistics, simple statistical measures like the mean, standard deviation and average are used. The findings follow an inductive approach based on sample data. The study result shows the positive relationship between factors (benefit, incentive, reward, compensation) and job performance. The study concluded that Management should motivate consistent behaviour that adheres to motivation factors, to keep the employees working for the organization. for that purpose, motivation factors can be used to mediate the conversation among management and employees regarding the importance of the organizational problems. The study also recommended the organization should be responsible to keep pace whether their employees are performing organizational and societal duties effectively or not. it provides a way to monitor the ethical practices of employees, both within and outside the organization. further, the implementation of ethical practices should be motivated by leaders to improve employee performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eko Oluwajuwon Toheeb & Abdoul Rahman Mhd Al Jounaidi & Maged Mustafa Al-Dubai, 2020. "The Effect of Motivation Factors on the Job Performance: A Case Study of Dangote Cement and Lafarge Cement Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(5), pages 45-54, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:5:p:45-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-7-issue-5/45-54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/the-effect-of-motivation-factors-on-the-job-performance-a-case-study-of-dangote-cement-and-lafarge-cement-companies-in-nigeria8493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dr. Olivia Anku-Tsede & Ernestina Kutin, 2013. "Total Reward Concept: A Key Motivational Tool For Corporate Ghana," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 173-182, December.
    2. Gallagher, William E, Jr & Einhorn, Hillel J, 1976. "Motivation Theory and Job Design," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(3), pages 358-373, July.
    3. Abbott, M. & Doucouliagos, C., 2003. "The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 89-97, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerstin Pull & Birgit Pferdmenges & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2017. "Do Research Training Groups Operate at Optimal Size?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(2), pages 129-145, May.
    2. Johnes, Jill, 2006. "Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 273-288, June.
    3. Guironnet, Jean-Pascal & Peypoch, Nicolas, 2018. "The geographical efficiency of education and research: The ranking of U.S. universities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 44-55.
    4. Maria Olivares & Heike Wetzel, 2011. "Competing in the Higher Education Market: Empirical Evidence for Economies of Scale and Scope in German Higher Education Institutions," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0070, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    5. Laureti, Tiziana & Secondi, Luca & Biggeri, Luigi, 2014. "Measuring the efficiency of teaching activities in Italian universities: An information theoretic approach," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 147-164.
    6. Dapeng Huang & Renhe Zhang & Zhiguo Huo & Fei Mao & Youhao E & Wei Zheng, 2012. "An assessment of multidimensional flood vulnerability at the provincial scale in China based on the DEA method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1575-1586, November.
    7. Angel García Correas & Manuel Larran Jorge, 2010. "Análisis de diferentes medidas de la eficiencia investigadora y factores explicativos en las universidades públicas españolas," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 5, in: María Jesús Mancebón-Torrubia & Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún & José María Gómez-Sancho & Gregorio Gim (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 36, pages 703-732, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    8. Alexandr Gedranovich & Mykhaylo Salnykov, 2012. "Productivity analysis of Belarusian higher education system," BEROC Working Paper Series 16, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC).
    9. Yang, Guoliang & Ahlgren, Per & Yang, Liying & Rousseau, Ronald & Ding, Jielan, 2016. "Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 238-253.
    10. Wohlrabe, Klaus & Bornmann, Lutz & de Moya Anegon, Felix, 2017. "Wie effizient sind Universitäten in Deutschland, deren Zukunftskonzepte im Rahmen der Exzellenzinitiative ausgezeichnet wurden? Ein empirischer Vergleich von Input- und Output-Daten zur Forschung [," MPRA Paper 76218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Horne, Jocelyn & Hu, Baiding, 2008. "Estimation of cost efficiency of Australian universities," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 266-275.
    12. Valentinas Navickas & Adriana Grenčíková & Karol Krajčo, 2021. "DEA model and efficiency of universities - case study in Slovak Republic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 348-362, September.
    13. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2009. "The Excellence in Research for Australia Scheme: An Evaluation of the Draft Journal Weights for Economics," Working Papers in Economics 09/07, University of Waikato.
    14. Mutz, Rüdiger & Bornmann, Lutz & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2017. "Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 613-628.
    15. Newton, Ashley N., 2015. "Executive compensation, organizational performance, and governance quality in the absence of owners," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 195-222.
    16. Jill Johnes, 2008. "Efficiency And Productivity Change In The English Higher Education Sector From 1996/97 To 2004/5," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 76(6), pages 653-674, December.
    17. Erik E. Lehmann & Michele Meoli & Stefano Paleari & Sarah A. E. Stockinger, 2018. "Approaching effects of the economic crisis on university efficiency: a comparative study of Germany and Italy," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(1), pages 37-54, March.
    18. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    19. Sourour Ramzi, 2019. "Modeling the Education Supply Chain with Network DEA Model: The Case of Tunisia," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(3), pages 525-540, September.
    20. Oleg V. Leshukov & Daria P. Platonova & Dmitry S. Semyonov, 2015. "Does Competition Matter? The Efficiency of Regional Higher Education Systems and Competition: The Case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 29/EDU/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:5:p:45-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.