IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/journl/v62y2017i213p67-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Models As Configurations Of Structure, Culture, Leadership, Control, And Change Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Nebojša Janićijević

Abstract

Starting from the axioms of consistency, stability, contingency, and configuration, research on organizational structure, culture, control, leadership, and change management strategy has shown that their typical configurations, or models, can be differentiated according to the same two criteria: distribution of power and dominant organizational dimension. On the one hand there are models of structure, culture, control, leadership, and change management strategy that are based on an unequal, or authoritarian, distribution of power within organizations, while on the other hand there are models that are based on democratic, or equal, distribution of power. Also, on the one hand there are models of structure, culture, control, leadership, and change strategy that are based on work structure and tasks, while on the other hand there are models of these organizational components that are based on social structure, people, and their relationships. Harmonization of typical configurations of organizational structure, culture, control, leadership, and change strategy occurs due to the harmonization of the differentiation criteria. Based on this harmonization, four organizational models have been identified as typical configurations of structure, culture, control, leadership, and change strategy: the autocratic, bureaucratic, innovative, and task models. Each of these models is effective in a different environmental contingency.

Suggested Citation

  • Nebojša Janićijević, 2017. "Organizational Models As Configurations Of Structure, Culture, Leadership, Control, And Change Strategy," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 62(213), pages 67-92, April - J.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:62:y:2017:i:213:p:67-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/461.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl F. Fey & Daniel R. Denison, 2003. "Organizational Culture And Effectiveness: Can American Theory Be Applied In Russia?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003-598, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    2. Carl F. Fey & Daniel R. Denison, 2003. "Organizational Culture and Effectiveness: Can American Theory Be Applied in Russia?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 686-706, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tahira Rasheed & Arshad Zaheer & Sadaf Manzoor, 2021. "Do Narcissists Tend to Reduce Interpersonal Conflicts in Organizations? The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Ostracism and Interpersonal Conflicts," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(6), pages 43-58.
    2. Muhammad Imran Hanif & Muhammad Shahzad Hani & Asif Kamran & Rabia Khan & Shao Yunfei, 2016. "Knowledge Sharing And Innovation Performance Affected By Hr Generic Strategies: An Empirical Study Of Smes In China And Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(1), pages 272-306.
    3. Wissal Affes & Habib Affes, 2022. "Business Model and Firm Performance in Tunisian Firms: a Mediated Moderation Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2822-2839, December.
    4. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    5. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Joyce Wanjiku Nderitu & Esther Waiganjo & George O. Orwa, 2021. "Evaluating effect of organizational culture on strategy implementation in private chartered universities in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 123-133, March.
    7. Yaprak, Attila & Tasoluk, Burcu & Kocas, Cenk, 2015. "Market orientation, managerial perceptions, and corporate culture in an emerging market: Evidence from Turkey," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 443-456.
    8. Igor Gurkov, 2016. "Human resource management in Russian manufacturing subsidiaries of multinational corporations," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 353-372, July.
    9. Andreeva, T. & Garanina, T., 2015. "Intellectual capital elements and organizational performance of Russian manufacturing companies," Working Papers 6413, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    10. Yanica Dimitrova, 2018. "The Culture of Innovation Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 39-68.
    11. Verdu-Jover, Antonio J. & Alos-Simo, Lirios & Gomez-Gras, Jose-Maria, 2018. "Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 330-340.
    12. Ramón Campos-Blázquez, Juan & Rubio-Andrada, Luis & Soledad Celemín-Pedroche, María, 2023. "Voices from within. To what extent can internal crowdsourcing drive a change in organizational culture?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Veton Jahmurataj, 2015. "Impact of Culture on Organizational Development: Case Study Kosovo," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 4, August.
    14. Nishani Bourmault & Jordan Siegel, 2022. "Why Local Adaptation Sometimes Fails to be Effective for MNEs: Exploring the Dynamics of Collective Bonuses, Egalitarianism, and Informal Norms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 886-924, June.
    15. Yilmaz, Cengiz & Ergun, Ercan, 2008. "Organizational culture and firm effectiveness: An examination of relative effects of culture traits and the balanced culture hypothesis in an emerging economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 290-306, July.
    16. Kwantes, Catherine T. & Boglarsky, Cheryl A., 2007. "Perceptions of organizational culture, leadership effectiveness and personal effectiveness across six countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 204-230, June.
    17. Bortolotti, Thomas & Boscari, Stefania & Danese, Pamela, 2015. "Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 182-201.
    18. Tiago Melo, 2012. "Determinants of corporate social performance: the influence of organizational culture, management tenure and financial performance," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 33-47, March.
    19. Li Bing & Zhang Jianpeng & Zhang Xiaoxia, 2013. "Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: An Exploratory Study," Creative and Knowledge Society, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 65-77, July.
    20. Bettina Büchel & Heidi Armbruster, 2006. "Erfolgsfaktoren von Innovationsteams: Der Einfluss der übereinstimmenden Wahrnehmung zwischen Teammitgliedern und unternehmensinternen Stakeholdern," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 506-524, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational model; organizational culture; organizational structure; leadership; organizational control; change strategy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:journl:v:62:y:2017:i:213:p:67-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.