IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i1p393-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Benefits, Social Influence, Self-Efficacy and Digital Consumerism: The Moderating Role of Digital Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Kamrul Islam Syed

    (Putra Business School, UPM, Malaysia)

  • Prof. Abu Bakr Sade

    (Putra Business School, UPM, Malaysia)

  • Prof. Huam Hon Tot

    (Putra Business School, UPM, Malaysia)

Abstract

Purpose: The study finds out the impact of perceived benefits, social influence, and self-efficacy on digital consumerism and how digital accountability moderates the conceptual relationship. Organizational capabilities, data privacy and protection, legal, and ethical marketing practices have been conceptualized as digital accountability with fact-based literature review. It is increasingly important for managers and consumer researchers to understand the trend and advocate digital accountability for enhancing digital consumerism in developing economies such as Bangladesh. Methods: Relevant literature on the relationships using a simple extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with key variables and subsequent digital consumerism would be the focal points of this study. For developing economies perceived digital accountability has been conceptualized as a moderator. The study is secondary with available literature review and data from the Bangladesh Telecommunication and Regulatory Commissions (BTRC). Findings: The proficiency of organizational capabilities, the role of regulatory authorities, data privacy, legal protection, unethical business practices, and subsequent digital vulnerability will continue to be a big challenge in this 21st century. There is an urgency for a reconceptualization of consumerism so that consumer protections can be improved and a better-functioning digital market can be developed. This paper focuses on the literature gap in key variables and digital accountability to safeguard data privacy and information transparency, improve organizational capability, legal protection of consumers, and ethical business practices into consideration while enhancing digital consumerism. The logical conceptual framework provides the foundation that will further guide this study and future empirical findings. Originality and Value: In the present scenario majority of the population in Bangladesh use computers, mobile devices or smartphones for their digital marketing needs. There is no previous research in digital consumerism in the context of developing nations. Therefore, it is expected to contribute new findings. It will help researchers and policymakers for future policy implications by addressing digital accountability from all dimensions to enhance better functioning digital consumerism. Limitations: The study is based on secondary information and an extensive literature review. The paper only highlights the current state of affairs and draws conclusions based on fact findings and literature gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamrul Islam Syed & Prof. Abu Bakr Sade & Prof. Huam Hon Tot, 2024. "Perceived Benefits, Social Influence, Self-Efficacy and Digital Consumerism: The Moderating Role of Digital Accountability," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 393-407, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:393-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-1/393-407.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/perceived-benefits-social-influence-self-efficacy-and-digital-consumerism-the-moderating-role-of-digital-accountability/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Mohammad Anisur Rahman & Md. Aminul Islam & Bushra Humyra Esha & Nahida Sultana & Sujan Chakravorty, 2018. "Consumer buying behavior towards online shopping: An empirical study on Dhaka city, Bangladesh," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1514940-151, January.
    3. Wang, Yichuan & Herrando, Carolina, 2019. "Does privacy assurance on social commerce sites matter to millennials?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 164-177.
    4. S. Umit Kucuk, 2016. "Consumerism in the Digital Age," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 515-538, November.
    5. Flurry, L. A. & Burns, Alvin C., 2005. "Children's influence in purchase decisions: a social power theory approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 593-601, May.
    6. Okazaki, Shintaro & Eisend, Martin & Plangger, Kirk & de Ruyter, Ko & Grewal, Dhruv, 2020. "Understanding the Strategic Consequences of Customer Privacy Concerns: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 458-473.
    7. Bearden, William O & Etzel, Michael J, 1982. "Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 183-194, September.
    8. O. C. Ferrell, 2017. "Broadening marketing’s contribution to data privacy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 160-163, March.
    9. Burnkrant, Robert E & Cousineau, Alain, 1975. "Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 206-215, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    2. Goodrich, Kendall & Mangleburg, Tamara F., 2010. "Adolescent perceptions of parent and peer influences on teen purchase: An application of social power theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1328-1335, December.
    3. Jaeki Song & Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi, 2005. "A Theoretical Approach to Web Design in E-Commerce: A Belief Reinforcement Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1219-1235, August.
    4. Yoshiko DeMotta & Sankar Sen, 2017. "How psychological contracts motivate employer-brand patronage," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 385-395, September.
    5. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    6. Ertugrul Uysal & Sascha Alavi & Valéry Bezençon, 2022. "Trojan horse or useful helper? A relationship perspective on artificial intelligence assistants with humanlike features," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1153-1175, November.
    7. Haris Krijestorac & Rajiv Garg & Prabhudev Konana, 2021. "Decisions Under the Illusion of Objectivity: Digital Embeddedness and B2B Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2232-2251, July.
    8. Fong, Cher-Min & Chang, Hsing-Hua Stella & Lin, Mong-Ching & Chen, I-Hung, 2022. "Reexamining emerging market animosity toward western developed countries: A social dilemma in physical retailing consumption under normative influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    10. Barbopoulos, Isak & Johansson, Lars-Olof, 2017. "The Consumer Motivation Scale: Development of a multi-dimensional and context-sensitive measure of consumption goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 118-126.
    11. Hsu, Chin-Lung & Lin, Judy Chuan-Chuan, 2016. "Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 42-53.
    12. João Proença & Inês Pereira, 2008. "Exploring the consumption of charity-linked products," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 5(1), pages 53-69, June.
    13. Jamal, Ahmad & Shukor, Syadiyah Abdul, 2014. "Antecedents and outcomes of interpersonal influences and the role of acculturation: The case of young British-Muslims," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 237-245.
    14. Lütjens, Henk & Eisenbeiss, Maik & Fiedler, Maximilian & Bijmolt, Tammo, 2022. "Determinants of consumers’ attitudes towards digital advertising – A meta-analytic comparison across time and touchpoints," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 445-466.
    15. Fernandes, Semila & Venkatesh, V.G. & Panda, Rajesh & Shi, Yangyan, 2021. "Measurement of factors influencing online shopper buying decisions: A scale development and validation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Jing Wang & Anocha Aribarg & Yves F. Atchadé, 2013. "Modeling Choice Interdependence in a Social Network," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(6), pages 977-997, November.
    17. Hutzinger, Clemens & Weitzl, Wolfgang J., 2021. "Co-creation of online service recoveries and its effects on complaint bystanders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 525-538.
    18. Maecker, Olaf & Grabenströer, Nadja Sophia & Clement, Michel & Heitmann, Mark, 2013. "Charts and demand: Empirical generalizations on social influence," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 429-431.
    19. Yongbo Sun & Jiajia Zhang, 2019. "Acquiescence or Resistance: Group Norms and Self-Interest Motivation in Unethical Consumer Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Shan Huang & Sinan Aral & Yu Jeffrey Hu & Erik Brynjolfsson, 2020. "Social Advertising Effectiveness Across Products: A Large-Scale Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1142-1165, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:393-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.