IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v15y2018i1p68-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divide In Marketing Between Academics And Practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda Capanema Repsold

    (Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro PUC-Rio)

  • Marcus Wilcox Hemais

    (Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro PUC-Rio)

Abstract

In marketing, there is a clear divide between academics and practitioners. However, there are few empirical studies in Brazil that help clarify the phenomenon. In light of this context, the present research seeks to understand how academics and practitioners perceive the divide between the academy and businesses and how this affects the applicability of theories, concepts and models in marketing. For this purpose, in-depth interviews were conducted with ten academics who teach marketing and 15 practitioners involved in the area. The reasons for the divide are presented, with emphasis on how the teaching of marketing contributes to the phenomenon. The paper shows how the divide affects the applicability of the discipline, and it gives suggestions on how to reduce the divide. Academics and practitioners show interest in reducing the divide. The difficulties for this to are owing to the different understandings of what marketing is. Such an inconsistency can be explained based on the purposes/reasons that lead these professionals to practice the discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda Capanema Repsold & Marcus Wilcox Hemais, 2018. "Divide In Marketing Between Academics And Practitioners," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(1), pages 68-87, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p68-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/8/9
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mascarenhas, André Ofenhejm & Zambaldi, Felipe & Moraes, Edmilson Alves de, 2011. "Rigor, Relevância e Desafios da Academia em Administração: Tensões entre Pesquisa e Formação Profissional," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 51(3), May.
    2. Stoeckl, Verena E. & Luedicke, Marius K., 2015. "Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2452-2463.
    3. Roberts, John H. & Kayande, Ujwal & Stremersch, Stefan, 2014. "From academic research to marketing practice: Exploring the marketing science value chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 127-140.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joern Redler & Holger J. Schmidt, 2022. "I know that I know nothing: exploring the managerial relevance of recent orientations in brand management research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(5), pages 498-511, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanina Rashkova & Ludovica Moi, 2023. "Moving forward better marketing for a better world: a path for new research opportunities," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(3), pages 413-428, September.
    2. Hélène Rainelli & Hélène Rainelli-Weiss, 2019. "Recherche en finance : quand la performativité invite à la réflexivité," Post-Print halshs-02025011, HAL.
    3. Stremersch, Stefan, 2021. "The Study of Important Marketing Issues: Reflections," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 12-17.
    4. Nicolae Cristina-Andreea, 2024. "Understanding sustainable purchasing behavior in Romania: Drivers, barriers, and environmental participation," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 362-381.
    5. Muhammad Ishfaq Khan & Shahbaz Khalid & Umer Zaman & Ana Ercília José & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Neil A. Morgan & Kimberly A. Whitler & Hui Feng & Simos Chari, 2019. "Research in marketing strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 4-29, January.
    7. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:258 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Stremersch, S. & Camacho, N.M.A. & Vanneste, S. & Verniers, I.W.J., 2014. "Unraveling Scientific Impact," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-014-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Roberts, John H. & Kayande, Ujwal & Stremersch, Stefan, 2014. "From academic research to marketing practice: Some further thoughts," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 144-146.
    10. Moro, Sérgio & Pires, Guilherme & Rita, Paulo & Cortez, Paulo, 2020. "A cross-cultural case study of consumers' communications about a new technological product," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 438-447.
    11. Joern Redler & Holger J. Schmidt, 2022. "I know that I know nothing: exploring the managerial relevance of recent orientations in brand management research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(5), pages 498-511, September.
    12. Bublitz, Melissa G. & Peracchio, Laura A., 2015. "Applying industry practices to promote healthy foods: An exploration of positive marketing outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2484-2493.
    13. Daniele Dalli, 2014. "Mercati e competitivit? in transizione," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(4), pages 7-11.
    14. Stremersch, Stefan & Camacho, Nuno & Vanneste, Sofie & Verniers, Isabel, 2015. "Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 64-77.
    15. Charles E. Gengler & Michael S. Mulvey, 2017. "Planning pre-launch positioning: Segmentation via willingness-to-pay and means-end brand differentiators," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 230-249, May.
    16. Zhang, Yifan & Fong, Duncan K.H. & DeSarbo, Wayne S., 2021. "A generalized ordinal finite mixture regression model for market segmentation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1055-1072.
    17. Dolnicar, Sara & Grün, Bettina & Leisch, Friedrich, 2016. "Increasing sample size compensates for data problems in segmentation studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 992-999.
    18. Schwartz-Landsman, V., 2020. "A Chasm to Cross: From Research to Practice and Back," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA 2020-081-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    19. Schmalz, Ulrike & Ringbeck, Jürgen & Spinler, Stefan, 2021. "Door-to-door air travel: Exploring trends in corporate reports using text classification models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Dawn Iacobucci & Maria Petrescu & Anjala Krishen & Michael Bendixen, 2019. "The state of marketing analytics in research and practice," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(3), pages 152-181, September.
    21. Raun, Janika & Ahas, Rein & Tiru, Margus, 2016. "Measuring tourism destinations using mobile tracking data," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 202-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p68-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.