IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2021i6p169-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Practices in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility (Comparative Analysis for Bulgaria, Romania and Serbia)

Author

Listed:
  • Mariya Georgieva
  • Vanya Kraleva
  • Svilen Ivanov

Abstract

Many companies in the market today face the challenge of finding an effective way to fulfil their role as good corporate citizens – companies that “do well by doing good”. The authors of the study consider the Corporate Social Responsibility as a practically applicable method to achieve this balance. The study provides a comparative analysis between companies recognized as socially responsible in Bulgaria, Romania and Serbia, by presenting the main aspects of the initiatives that lead to these companies to be identified as a benchmark in the implementation of CSR policies. On this basis, the authors of the study: (1) outline key areas of CSR in the countries concerned by defining similarities and differences in the scope and the content of the initiatives that companies initiate and/or engage in; (2) highlight good practices in the field of CSR, where there is a possibility for transfer of know-how among companies from the three countries; (3) identify areas with underdeveloped potential in which companies in the countries concerned can focus their efforts and resources in order to optimize their engagement in the field of CSR. The results of the conducted analysis are compared with the point of view of consumers who take both the roles of beneficiaries of the effects of socially responsible behaviour of companies and of active participants in market relations, having the power to motivate and require companies to be conscious corporate citizens. The purpose of the comparison is to find unused positioning opportunities through specific actions related to CSR in specific consumer segments and/or to outline opportunities for optimizing communications in this direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariya Georgieva & Vanya Kraleva & Svilen Ivanov, 2021. "Good Practices in the Field of Corporate Social Responsibility (Comparative Analysis for Bulgaria, Romania and Serbia)," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 169-191.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2021:i:6:p:169-191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2021/2021-6/9_Maria-Georgieva_f_f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanisavljević, Milena, 2017. "The Analysis of CSR Reports of Serbian Companies," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 373-380, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    2. Goodpaster, Kenneth E., 1991. "Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 53-73, January.
    3. Evgeni Stanimirov & Mariya Georgieva, 2019. "Customer Profiling Based on the Criteria of Sustainable Consumption," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 3-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariya Georgieva, 2020. "About the Corporate Social Responsibility Beyond the Framework of Charity," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 9(1), pages 35-44, April.
    2. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    3. Johanna Kujala & Anna Heikkinen & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2012. "Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 53-65, August.
    4. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Karolus Karni Lando & Achmad Sudiro & Wahdiyat Moko & Nur Khusniyah Indrawati, 2024. "The Effect of Service Quality on Recertification. Mediated by Customer Satisfaction and Relationship Commitment," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 160-179.
    6. Kim, Rebecca Chunghee & Yoo, Kate Inyoung & Uddin, Helal, 2018. "The Korean Air nut rage scandal: Domestic versus international responses to a viral incident," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 533-544.
    7. Lee, Eun Mi & Park, Seong-Yeon & Rapert, Molly I. & Newman, Christopher L., 2012. "Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1558-1564.
    8. Andrew West, 2006. "Theorising South Africa’s Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 433-448, November.
    9. Heidbrink Ludger, 2012. "Unternehmen als politische Akteure. Eine Ortsbestimmung zwischen Ordnungsverantwortung und Systemverantwortung / Companies as political actors. Locating regulatory responsibility and systemsresponsibi," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 203-232, January.
    10. Ana Esteves & Mary-Anne Barclay, 2011. "New Approaches to Evaluating the Performance of Corporate–Community Partnerships: A Case Study from the Minerals Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 189-202, October.
    11. Aureli, Selena & Del Baldo, Mara, 2019. "Performance measurement in the networked context of convention and visitors bureaus (CVBs)," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 92-105.
    12. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    13. Martin Sandbu, 2012. "Stakeholder Duties: On the Moral Responsibility of Corporate Investors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 97-107, August.
    14. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Bazlur RAHMAN, & Idris ALI, & Alexandru Mircea NEDELEA, 2017. "Greenwashing In Canadian Firms: An Assessment Of Environmental Claimsgreenwashing In Canadian Firms: An Assessment Of Environmental Claims," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(2), pages 1-8, july.
    16. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    17. Maignan, Isabelle & Ferrell, O. C., 2003. "Nature of corporate responsibilities: Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 55-67, January.
    18. Ataur Belal & Omneya Abdelsalam & Sardar Nizamee, 2015. "Ethical Reporting in Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited (1983–2010)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(4), pages 769-784, July.
    19. Carlo Ludovico Cordasco, 2024. "The Ethics of Entrepreneurship: A Millian Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 217-229, May.
    20. Jose Lopez-De-Pedro & Eva Rimbau-Gilabert, 2012. "Stakeholder Approach: What Effects Should We Take into Account in Contemporary Societies?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 147-158, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2021:i:6:p:169-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.