IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v16y2018i149p122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack

Author

Listed:
  • Cheok Mui Yee

    (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Edward Wong Sek Khin

    (Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya, Malaysia)

  • Kamisah Ismail

    (Faculty of Business and Accountancy)

Abstract

The existence of budgetary slack permeates every level of private sector organisations. Employees (i.e., budget makers) usually request excessive budgetary resources in the budgeting process. Due to its dysfunctional nature, existing researchers had extensively examined the relationship between budgetary slack and employees’ performance. This study adopted a survey questionnaire approach to examine the relationship between determinants of psychological ownership and employees’ intention to create slack in budgeting. There were 475 budget makers from private sector organisations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia who participated in this study through a questionnaire survey. Preliminary data analysis was performed using normality, multi-collinearity, variance inflation index (VIF), common method variance, and reliability analysis. Multiple regression analysis was also applied to investigate the relationships of each dimension of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack. This paper is considered a pioneer empirical study that investigates the determinants of psychological ownership on budgetary slack among budget makers from the psychological perspective in the context of private sector organisations in Malaysia, where slack activities in budgeting existed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheok Mui Yee & Edward Wong Sek Khin & Kamisah Ismail, 2018. "Determinants of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(149), pages 122-122, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:16:y:2018:i:149:p:122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9565.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, John J. & Macintosh, Norman B. & Moore, John C., 1990. "Budget-related behavior in public sector organizations: Some empirical evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 221-246.
    2. Lukka, Kari, 1988. "Budgetary biasing in organizations: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 281-301, April.
    3. Rahimah Mohamed Yunos & Zubaidah Ismail & Malcolm Smith, 2012. "Ethnicity and accounting conservatism: Malaysian evidence," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 34-57, May.
    4. Chong M. Lau & Christen Buckland, 2001. "Budgeting—the Role of Trust and Participation: A Research Note," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(3), pages 369-388, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Löning, Hélène & Besson, M. & Mendoza, Carla, 2008. "Dual use of budgeting in uncertainty contexts: Explorative study of senior sales and marketing managers," HEC Research Papers Series 897, HEC Paris.
    2. Kilfoyle, Eksa & Richardson, Alan J., 2011. "Agency and structure in budgeting: Thesis, antithesis and synthesis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 183-199.
    3. Staci A. Kenno & Michelle C. Lau & Barbara J. Sainty, 2018. "In Search of a Theory of Budgeting: A Literature Review," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 507-553, December.
    4. manuela S. Macinati & Marco G. Rizzo & Gianluca D'Agostino, 2014. "Partecipazione al processo di budget, accuratezza e utilit? delle informazioni di budget e performance. I risultati di un caso studi," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(92), pages 55-75.
    5. Charpentier, Claes, 1998. "Budgetary Participation in a Public Service Organization," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 3, Stockholm School of Economics.
    6. Nooraisah Katmon & Zam Zuriyati Mohamad & Norlia Mat Norwani & Omar Al Farooque, 2019. "Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 447-481, June.
    7. Frank H.M. Verbeeten, 2008. "Performance management practices in public sector organizations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 427-454, March.
    8. Gooneratne, Tharusha N. & Hoque, Zahirul, 2016. "Institutions, agency and the institutionalization of budgetary control in a hybrid state-owned entity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 58-70.
    9. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:173-183 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Arwan Gunawan & Winwin Yadiati & Harry Suharman & K. Poppy Sofia, 2020. "Linkages to Budgetary Control and Budgetary Absorption Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 304-316.
    11. Langevin, Pascal & Mendoza, Carla, 2013. "How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 209-222.
    12. Chong Lau & Ian Eggleton, 2003. "The influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between participation and slack," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 91-104.
    13. Wiersma, Eelke, 2017. "How and when do firms translate slack into better performance?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 445-459.
    14. Madah Marzuki, Marziana & Abdul Wahab, Effiezal Aswadi, 2016. "Institutional factors and conditional conservatism in Malaysia: Does international financial reporting standards convergence matter?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 191-209.
    15. Derfuss, Klaus, 2016. "Reconsidering the participative budgeting–performance relation: A meta-analysis regarding the impact of level of analysis, sample selection, measurement, and industry influences," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 17-37.
    16. Norman T. Sheehan, 2008. "Enticing Employees to Lie: Using Role Play to Understand and Mitigate Unintended Consequences of Budgeting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 165-172, May.
    17. Noeverman, J., 2010. "Not Just Because it is Fair - The Role of Feedback Quality and Voice in Performance Evaluation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-048-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Manuela Macinati & Marco Giovanni Rizzo, 2018. "Il ruolo di moderazione dell?identit? professionale medica nella relazione tra partecipazione al processo di budget e performance dei medici responsabili di struttura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(106), pages 11-36.
    19. repec:ers:ijebaa:v:v:y:2017:i:1:p:83-99 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Shu, Wei & Chen, Ying & Chen, Xuejiao, 2023. "Information technology empowerment and corporate budget control: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. Fauré, Bertrand & Rouleau, Linda, 2011. "The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 167-182, April.
    22. Zahirul Hoque & Trevor Hopper, 1997. "Political and Industrial Relations Turbulence, Competition and Budgeting in the Nationalised Jute Mills of Bangladesh," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 125-143.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgetary slack; psychological ownership; private sector organisations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:16:y:2018:i:149:p:122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.