IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v37y2001i3p369-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Budgeting—the Role of Trust and Participation: A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • Chong M. Lau
  • Christen Buckland

Abstract

Prior studies have found a combination of an evaluative style with high budget emphasis and high participation to be associated with better behavioural outcomes (e.g., lower job‐related tension) than all other combinations of budget emphasis and participation. Yet there has been little research to investigate the theory on why this particular combination of budget emphasis and participation is associated with better behavioural outcomes. A path analytical model, which investigates the intervening effects of trust and participation on the relationship between budget emphasis and job‐related tension, was used. Senior Norwegian managers were selected as subjects for this study. The results indicate that budget emphasis has an insignificant direct effect on job‐related tension but a strong indirect effect through trust and participation. Trust also has an intervening effect on the relationship between budgetary participation and job‐related tension. It is therefore possible to conclude that high budget emphasis is associated with high budgetary participation and high trust. High trust, in turn, is associated with reduced subordinates’ job‐related tension.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong M. Lau & Christen Buckland, 2001. "Budgeting—the Role of Trust and Participation: A Research Note," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(3), pages 369-388, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:37:y:2001:i:3:p:369-388
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6281.00092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00092
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6281.00092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lau, Chong M. & Sholihin, Mahfud, 2005. "Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 389-413.
    2. Marcel Van Rinsum & Frank H.M. Verbeeten, 2012. "The impact of subjectivity in performance evaluation practices on public sector managers’ motivation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 377-396, September.
    3. Stephan Kramer & Frank Hartmann, 2014. "How Top-down and Bottom-up Budgeting Affect Budget Slack and Performance through Social and Economic Exchange," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(3), pages 314-340, September.
    4. Kampkötter, Patrick & Maier, Patrick, 2020. "The effect of appraisal interviews and target agreements on employee effort - New evidence using representative data," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 136, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
    5. Larissa Kyj & Robert J. Parker, 2008. "Antecedents of Budget Participation: Leadership Style, Information Asymmetry, and Evaluative Use of Budget," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(4), pages 423-442, December.
    6. Noeverman, J., 2010. "Not Just Because it is Fair - The Role of Feedback Quality and Voice in Performance Evaluation," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-048-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Jan Noeverman & Bas A.S. Koene & Roger Williams, 2005. "Construct measurement of evaluative style: a review and proposal," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 77-107, April.
    8. Cheok Mui Yee & Edward Wong Sek Khin & Kamisah Ismail, 2018. "Determinants of employees’ psychological ownership on budgetary slack," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(149), pages 122-122, February.
    9. Tobias Johansson & Gabriella Wennblom, 2017. "In female supervisors male subordinates trust!? An experiment on supervisor and subordinate gender and the perceptions of tight control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 321-345, October.
    10. Chong Lau & Ian Eggleton, 2003. "The influence of information asymmetry and budget emphasis on the relationship between participation and slack," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 91-104.
    11. Sholihin, Mahfud & Pike, Richard & Mangena, Musa & Li, Jing, 2011. "Goal-setting participation and goal commitment: Examining the mediating roles of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust in a UK financial services organisation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 135-146.
    12. Lau, Chong M. & Scully, Glennda & Lee, Alina, 2018. "The effects of organizational politics on employee motivations to participate in target setting and employee budgetary participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 247-259.
    13. manuela S. Macinati & Marco G. Rizzo & Gianluca D'Agostino, 2014. "Partecipazione al processo di budget, accuratezza e utilit? delle informazioni di budget e performance. I risultati di un caso studi," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(92), pages 55-75.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:37:y:2001:i:3:p:369-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.