IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p551-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Perspective of Service-Dominant Logic on Customer Participation: A Meta-Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Thu-Huong Pham*

    (Head of Undergraduate Department, Foreign Trade University, 91 Chua Lang Str., Hanoi, Vietnam)

  • Wann-Yih Wu

    (Professor of Marketing, Program of International Business, Nanhua University, No. 55, Dalin Township. Chiayi County 62249, Taiwan)

  • Phuoc-Thien Nguyen

    (Ph.D student, Department of Business Administration, Nanhua University, No. 55, Dalin Township, Chiayi County 62249, Taiwan)

Abstract

Customer participation (CP) has received a special interest in service research. It is one of the most important aspects of services which can improve outcomes for customers and service providers. Through their participation, customers play a significant role on the service process and its outcomes. Different studies have investigated CP issues from different angels. Specifically, most of previous studies has focused on the influential factors of CP, the consequential and moderating factors are largerly ignored. However, previous studies have yet to explore an integrative framework of customer participation with multiple antecedents, consequences and moderatorsIn this study, meta-analysis was conducted by collecting data from previous studies using customer participation as its main topic. The results from meta-analysis suggested that customer participation has a positive effect on customer citizenship behaviors (i.e., recommendation, helping customers, and providing feedback), while service-dominant orientation, personality and subjective has positive effect on customer participation. Eleven hypotheses are proposed in this study. It is expected that the results of this research can enable us to get better understanding about antecedents and consequences of customer participation. The results could be very helpful for academicians to further validate the research model and could also be very useful for professionals to design and implement their service strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Thu-Huong Pham* & Wann-Yih Wu & Phuoc-Thien Nguyen, 2019. "A Perspective of Service-Dominant Logic on Customer Participation: A Meta-Analysis Approach," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 551-558, 02-2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:551-558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(2)551-558.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/02-2019/2/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karpen, Ingo O. & Bove, Liliana L. & Lukas, Bryan A. & Zyphur, Michael J., 2015. "Service-Dominant Orientation: Measurement and Impact on Performance Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 89-108.
    2. Bolton, Ruth & Saxena-Iyer, Shruti, 2009. "Interactive Services: A Framework, Synthesis and Research Directions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 91-104.
    3. Ennew, Christine T. & Binks, Martin R., 1999. "Impact of Participative Service Relationships on Quality, Satisfaction and Retention: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 121-132, October.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Tether, Bruce S. & Tajar, Abdelouahid, 2008. "Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 1079-1095, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, David Xin & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa & Sheng, Olivia R. Liu, 2011. "e-SELFQUAL: A scale for measuring online self-service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 508-515, May.
    2. Pham Ngoc Thuy & Le Nguyen Hau & Nguyen Kim Ngoc Duyen, 2019. "A value perspective of service interaction quality: the case of immigrants returning to native countries as medical tourists," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Anning-Dorson, Thomas, 2018. "Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 269-280.
    4. Georgia Katsifaraki, 2018. "Value creation in the market ecosystem: A Service-Dominant logic perspective," University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics 14-2018, University of Cyprus Department of Economics.
    5. Pires, Guilherme D. & Dean, Alison & Rehman, Muqqadas, 2015. "Using service logic to redefine exchange in terms of customer and supplier participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 925-932.
    6. Lorena Blasco-Arcas & Blanca I. Hernandez-Ortega & Julio Jimenez-Martinez, 2014. "Collaborating online: the roles of interactivity and personalization," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 677-698, May.
    7. Chathoth, Prakash K. & Ungson, Gerardo R. & Altinay, Levent & Chan, Eric S.W. & Harrington, Robert & Okumus, Fevzi, 2014. "Barriers affecting organisational adoption of higher order customer engagement in tourism service interactions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 181-193.
    8. Sanam Akhavannasab & Danilo C. Dantas & Sylvain Senecal, 2018. "Consumer empowerment in consumer–firm relationships: conceptual framework and implications for research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 214-227, December.
    9. Le Nguyen Hau & Pham Ngoc Tram Anh & Pham Ngoc Thuy, 2017. "The effects of interaction behaviors of service frontliners on customer participation in the value co-creation: a study of health care service," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 253-277, June.
    10. Beibei Dong & K. Sivakumar, 2017. "Customer participation in services: domain, scope, and boundaries," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 944-965, November.
    11. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    13. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    14. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    15. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    17. Hsiao, Chan & Lee, Yi-Hsuan & Chen, Wan-Jun, 2015. "The effect of servant leadership on customer value co-creation: A cross-level analysis of key mediating roles," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 45-57.
    18. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    19. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    20. Jacqueline Ruth & Steffen Willwacher & Oliver Korn, 2022. "Acceptance of Digital Sports: A Study Showing the Rising Acceptance of Digital Health Activities Due to the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:551-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.