IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p549-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agroindustrial Complex in the Eastern European Countries in the Context of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Maryna V. Shashyna

    (Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Faculty Management and Marketing, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute†, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Oleg V. Zakharchenko

    (Department of "Management and Marketing", Institute of Business and Information Technology, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Odessa, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr V. Darushyn

    (SST Group LLC, Odessa, Ukraine)

  • Zoriana M. Buryk

    (Regional management and Local Self-Government Department, Lviv Regional Institute for Public Administration National academy for for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, Lviv-Briukhovychi, Ukraine)

  • Maria I. Shpinkovska

    (Department of Higher Mathematics and Modeling Systems, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine)

Abstract

The research paper deals with the formation of new scientific solutions concerning evaluation of the development of the agroindustrial complex, its role in ensuring sustainable development of the national economy, identifying problems and developing ways to solve them in the current conditions of the functioning of agrarian production in the countries of Eastern Europe. The research emphasizes the key importance of agrarian production to ensure the food and economic security of Eastern European countries. It has been revealed that the agroindustrial complex plays a significant role in the countries of Eastern Europe, especially as concerns Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Moldova, Bulgaria and Romania. There are problems with the formation of effective state support of agrarian production in the countries selected for study, especially as regards the countries of Eastern Europe, which are not members of the European Union. The methodology for assessing the development of the agroindustrial complex in Eastern European countries was developed and proposed for use, as well as calculations on its basis were made, which allowed to divide all countries of this region into three groups: countries - outsiders (Ukraine, Moldova, Russia); countries, where the development of agrarian industry is of concern (Belarus, Romania, Bulgaria); countries that need to improve the agrarian sector of the national economy (Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland). A complex of agrarian production problems was identified for each of the Eastern European countries, and the key ways of their elimination were proposed, which are aimed at: reforming the market of agricultural land; stimulating the development of farms; increasing efficiency of state support of agrarian production; intensification of development and introduction of innovations in the agrarian sector; the transformation of the structure of the agro commodities market, including the optimization of their export and import.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryna V. Shashyna & Oleg V. Zakharchenko & Oleksandr V. Darushyn & Zoriana M. Buryk & Maria I. Shpinkovska, 2018. "Agroindustrial Complex in the Eastern European Countries in the Context of Sustainable Development," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 549-562:5.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:549-562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/spi5.jssr5(4)549-562.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/special_issue/12-2018/5/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:srs:journl:jemt:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:407-416 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Andrey KOVALTCHUK & Ekaterina BLINOVA & Konstantin MILORADOV, 2017. "Increasing the Competitiveness of the Russian Hotel Enterprises under Modern Conditions," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 407-416.
    3. Csaki, S. & Nash, J., 1998. "The Agrarian Economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Situation and Perspectives, 1997," World Bank - Discussion Papers 387, World Bank.
    4. LERMAN, Zvi, 2009. "Land reform, farm structure, and agricultural performance in CIS countries," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 316-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maxim V. Khatser & Yuliia A. Perehuda & Tatiana M. Korpaniuk & Khrystyna S. Stoliaruk & Irina M. Yepifanova & Oleksandr O. Shpynkovskyi, 2020. "Anti-Crisis Financial and Personnel Management as Key Factors to Provide Effective Development of Eastern European Enterprises in the Agricultural Sector," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 166-177.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:1167-1180 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lerman, Zvi, 2001. "A Decade Of Land Reform And Farm Restructuring: What Russia Can Learn From The World Experience," Discussion Papers 14985, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    3. Petrick, Martin, 2017. "Incentive provision to farm workers in post-socialist settings: evidence from East Germany and North Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 239-256.
    4. Ayal Kimhi, 2023. "Land Reform and Its Effect on Farm Household Income Inequality: Evidence from Georgia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Livia Bizikova & Maria Nijnik & Anatoliy Nijnik, 2015. "Exploring institutional changes in agriculture to inform adaptation planning to climate change in transition countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1385-1406, December.
    6. Djanibekov, Nodir & Sommer, Rolf & Djanibekov, Utkur, 2013. "Evaluation of effects of cotton policy changes on land and water use in Uzbekistan: Application of a bio-economic farm model at the level of a water users association," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Zvi Lerman, 2017. "Should agricultural employment in transition economies be encouraged?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 328-328, January.
    8. Hanson, James C. & Matavulj, Miodrag & Manzuk, Gregory & Richardson, John G., 2007. "Agricultural Cooperatives and Unions of Cooperatives in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Opportunities for Improvement," Working Papers 7344, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Lerman, Zvi & Kislev, Yoav & Biton, David & Kriss, Alon, 2003. "Agricultural Output and Productivity in the Former Soviet Republics," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(4), pages 999-1018, July.
    10. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, 2016. "Family farming in Europe and Central Asia: history, characteristics, threats and potentials," Working Papers 153, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    11. Petrick, Martin & Ditges, C. Markus, 2000. "Risk In Agriculture As Impediment To Rural Lending - The Case Of North-Western Kazakhstan," IAMO Discussion Papers 14939, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    12. Burton Abrams & Plamen Yossifov, 2003. "The Importance Of Property Rights For Economic Outcomes: Lessons From The Transfer Of Productive Assets From Collective To Private Ownership In Bulgarian Agriculture," Microeconomics 0302006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Roman I. Blahuta & Zoriana Ya. Kovalchuk & Nataliia Bondarchuk & Oleksandra Kononova & Hanna Ilchenko, 2019. "Financial Resources and Organizational Culture as Determinants for Competitive Strategy of Enterprises," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 471-482.
    14. Akramov, Kamiljon T. & Omuraliev, Nurbek, 2009. "Institutional change, rural services, and agricultural performance in Kyrgyzstan:," IFPRI discussion papers 904, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Utkur Djanibekov & Grace B. Villamor & Klara Dzhakypbekova & James Chamberlain & Jianchu Xu, 2016. "Adoption of Sustainable Land Uses in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case for Agroforestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Csáki, Csaba & Jámbor, Attila, 2018. "Konvergencia vagy divergencia. Merre tart Kelet-Közép-Európa és a FÁK mezőgazdasága? [Convergence versus divergence: Where is agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS countries heading," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1048-1066.
    17. Maxim V. Khatser & Yuliia A. Perehuda & Tatiana M. Korpaniuk & Khrystyna S. Stoliaruk & Irina M. Yepifanova & Oleksandr O. Shpynkovskyi, 2020. "Anti-Crisis Financial and Personnel Management as Key Factors to Provide Effective Development of Eastern European Enterprises in the Agricultural Sector," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 166-177.
    18. Liefert, William M., 2005. "Decomposing Changes in Agricultural Price Gaps," Working Papers 14592, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    19. Pomfret, Richard, 2007. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Kazakhstan," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48360, World Bank.
    20. Csaba Csaki & Attila Jambor, 2019. "Convergence or divergence - Transition in agriculture of Central and Eastern Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States revisited," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 160-174.
    21. Schott, Johanna & Kalatas, Talin & Nercissians, Emilia & Barkmann, Jan & Shelia, Vakhtang, 2016. "The impact of protected areas on local livelihoods in the South Caucasus [Naturschutzgebiete und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Erwerbsquellen der lokalen Anrainerbevölkerung im Südkaukasus]," IAMO Discussion Papers 152, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2018:p:549-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.