IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jabsss/2016p8-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of social relations on knowledge conflicts–an empirical study from Chinese universities

Author

Listed:
  • Huimin Liu

    (Nanjing University, China)

  • Xiaofeng Dong

    (Nanjing University, China)

Abstract

This paper aims to systematically investigate the impact of different types of social relationships on knowledge conflicts during the process of knowledge sharing based on the theory of relation model. This empirical study collected 288 surveys from research team members in fourteen universities in China. The results show that public sharing and academic power have positive effects on cognitive knowledge conflicts and negative effects on emotional knowledge conflicts; expected association has more significant effects on knowledge conflicts than expected reward; sharing cost has positive effects on knowledge conflict, knowledge sharing willingness plays a mediating role between social relations and knowledge conflicts. At last, the paper presents management suggestions from perspectives of team trust, power allocation and incentive methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Huimin Liu & Xiaofeng Dong, 2016. "Influence of social relations on knowledge conflicts–an empirical study from Chinese universities," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(1), pages 8-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2016:p:8-18
    DOI: 10.20474/jabs-2.1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jabs2.1.2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/jabs-2.1.2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jabs-2.1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boer, Niels-Ingvar & Berends, Hans & van Baalen, Peter, 2011. "Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 85-97, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sajad Rezaei & Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, 2014. "Examining online channel selection behaviour among social media shoppers: a PLS analysis," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 28-51.
    2. Shazrin Azlin Ruslan & Amer Hamzah Jantan & Dahlia Zawawi & Zanurul Huzaima Zainudin, 2016. "Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Traits Emotional Intelligence in Police Forces," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 138-145, December.
    3. Batistič, Saša & Poell, Rob F., 2022. "Do HR systems and relational climates affect knowledge hiding? An experiment and two-source multi-level study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 82-96.
    4. Nicole Stofberg & Flore Bridoux & Francesca Ciulli & Niccolò Pisani & Ans Kolk & Marlene Vock, 2021. "A Relational‐Models View to Explain Peer‐to‐Peer Sharing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1033-1069, June.
    5. Arsham Farzinnia & Corine Boon, 2024. "An Analytical Approach to (Meta)Relational Models Theory, and its Application to Triple Bottom Line (Profit, People, Planet) -- Towards Social Relations Portfolio Management," Papers 2402.18764, arXiv.org.
    6. Li, Guiquan & Shang, Yufan & Liu, Haixin & Xi, Youmin, 2014. "Differentiated transformational leadership and knowledge sharing: A cross-level investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 554-563.
    7. Curado, Carla & Muñoz-Pascual, Lucía & Galende, Jesús, 2018. "Antecedents to innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 206-215.
    8. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Carla Curado & Jesús Galende, 2019. "The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Russo, Giovanni & Van Houten, Gijs, 2021. "Complex Job Design and Layers of Hierarchy," IZA Discussion Papers 14455, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    11. Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir & Muhammad Yasir & Zahid Yousaf, 2021. "Network capability and strategic performance in SMEs: the role of strategic flexibility and organizational ambidexterity," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 587-610, December.
    12. Encarnación García-Sánchez & Víctor Jesús García-Morales & María Teresa Bolívar-Ramos, 2017. "The influence of top management support for ICTs on organisational performance through knowledge acquisition, transfer, and utilisation," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 19-51, January.
    13. Hina Shahid & Shafaq Arif Chaudhry & Furrakh Abbas & Saira Ghulam Hassan & Shoaib Aslam, 2023. "Do Morality-Based Individual Differences and Relational Climates Matter? Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Hiding: A Multilevel Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    14. Meiseberg, Brinja & Perrigot, Rozenn, 2020. "Pricing-based practices, conflicts and performance in franchising," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 939-955.
    15. Friedrich, Julia & Becker, Michael & Kramer, Frederik & Wirth, Markus & Schneider, Martin, 2020. "Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 341-352.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2016:p:8-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Usman Raja (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/9 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.