IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijbaas/2015p42-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Electronic Court Records Risk Management: Conceptions and Development of Framework

Author

Listed:
  • WAN SATIRAH WAN MOHD SAMAN

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

  • NURAISYAH CHUA ABDULLAH

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

  • NORHAYATI BABA

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

  • NORSHILA SHAIFUDDIN

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

  • WAN NOR HALIZA WAN MOKHTAR

    (Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia)

Abstract

The institutionalization of technologies in the Malaysian judicial setting has taken place since 2009 when a number of e-Court applications were implemented, in line with the government inspiration of Vision 2020. The Case Management System, Electronic Filing System, Queue Management System and Court Recording and Transcribing System are well in place and manage to reduce the backlogs of court cases and expedite the current case management which give a facelift to Malaysian judiciary reputation. However, the sustainability of the system is not guaranteed due to the fact that the e-Court applications have not been properly implemented based on an established sustainability framework for long term preservation and disaster preparedness. This research aims to develop a sustainable risk management framework for electronic court records management which consist of three layers, first being the requirement to follow the appropriate electronic records management lifecycle coupled with the risk management procedures; and second, the legal compliance framework, which requires every electronic system to comply four level of legal requirement i.e. the ISO standards, the legislations, the national policies and the organizational policies which focus on the sustainability domain including secure backup procedures, audit trail and other risk management features; and third, the jurisdiction specific e-court risk management. Failing to conform to these requirements posts a risk of noncompliance which can result a damaging consequences. In addressing issues related to electronic court records risk management, a number of related conceptions are discussed such as change management and ICT infrastructure. The proposed sustainable risk management framework for electronic court records management is proposed to be tested in other jurisdictions and other settings because it relates with the universal issue of risk at organizational, national and international level.

Suggested Citation

  • Wan Satirah Wan Mohd Saman & Nuraisyah Chua Abdullah & Norhayati Baba & Norshila Shaifuddin & Wan Nor Haliza Wan Mokhtar, 2015. "Sustainable Electronic Court Records Risk Management: Conceptions and Development of Framework," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(1), pages 42-48.
    • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2015:p:42-48
    DOI: 10.20469/ijbas.1.10007-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/business-administrative-studies-article-7/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/IJBAS10007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijbas.1.10007-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovan Francesco Lanzara & Gerardo Patriotta, 2001. "Technology and The Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7), pages 943-971, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kent D. Miller & Shu-Jou Lin, 2010. "Different Truths in Different Worlds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 97-114, February.
    2. Gerardo Patriotta, 2003. "Sensemaking on the Shop Floor: Narratives of Knowledge in Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 349-375, March.
    3. MariaLaura Di Domenico & Helen Haugh & Paul Tracey, 2010. "Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 681-703, July.
    4. Américo, Bruno Luiz & Carniel, Fagner & Clegg, Stewart Roger, 2019. "Accounting for the formation of scientific fields in organization studies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 18-28.
    5. Sunday Bolade, 2024. "Towards a Measurable Substance of Organizational Knowledge," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 751-770, March.
    6. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    7. Woojin Yoon & Jaeyun Jeong & Kyoung Won Park, 2021. "Informal Network Structure and Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: An Empirical Study of a Korean Paint Manufacturing Company," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Khurshid, Hamid & Snell, Robin Stanley, 2021. "Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2015:p:42-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://kkgpublications.com/business/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.