IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ani/irdjom/v3y2021i1p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management during and after Covid-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Quantitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zafar Iqbal

    (institute of Business Management and Sciences, Department of Management Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Hasnain

    (Department of Management Sciences, NCBA&E Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

Abstract

This study reviewed the status of various management sectors of Pakistan, i.e., education, health, and economic. The current international economic disease COVID-19 is the highlighted determinant because it almost affects all the segments. It was initially diagnosed in China and then spread all over the world. It is declared as Coronavirus and also as a global pandemic by WHO. So, the Pakistan health ministry prepared some plans of action to fight global pandemics like the rest of the world health ministries under theguidelines of Global Health Security. After diagnosing the first patient in Pakistan, it spreads exponentially, and after few days, it covered hundreds and thousands of people. The infection line remained straight upwards till September 1, 2020, and then it shifts downwards from November 15, 2020, to January 15, 2021. In this situation, the Pakistani government and health ministry took several hard decisions to minimize that pandemic's effect. One of them is lockdown which almost took by every country. Theeffect of lockdown in Pakistan is from November 15, 2020, because the curve of COVID-19 moving to declined. This global pandemic destroyed every sector of the country; in 2020, Pakistan's budget deficit is -2.3% and after that pandemic in 2021 budget deficit reached -8.1%, which created an alarming situation in Pakistan and the rest of the world. But after the proper management by the Pakistan government, the budget 2020-2021 schemes improved the total revenue of Pakistan up to 7.4% of the GDP and reduced the expenditure that resulted in a deficit reduction. Conclusively, despite Coronavirus, the GDP of Pakistan significantly improved in the past few years. So in this study discussed the problem created by global pandemic COVID-19 and how the government of Pakistan overcame this global issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Zafar Iqbal & Muhammad Hasnain, 2021. "Management during and after Covid-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Quantitative Study," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(1), pages 46-55, june.
    • Handle: RePEc:ani:irdjom:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:46-55
    DOI: 10.52131/jom.2021.0301.0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/article/view/179
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/article/view/179/157
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52131/jom.2021.0301.0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thunström, Linda & Newbold, Stephen C. & Finnoff, David & Ashworth, Madison & Shogren, Jason F., 2020. "The Benefits and Costs of Using Social Distancing to Flatten the Curve for COVID-19," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 179-195, July.
    2. Suhaib Ahmad & Abdurrahman Adamu Pantamee & Syed Moin-ud-Din Shah, 2020. "The Role of Human Resource Management Practices on Palm Oil Firm’s Performance in Malaysia with Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capabilities and Moderating Role of Organizational Support," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 22-33, June.
    3. Chiapello, Eve, 2017. "Critical accounting research and neoliberalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 47-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James K. Hammitt, 2020. "Valuing mortality risk in the time of COVID-19," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 129-154, October.
    2. Hugo S. Gonçalves & Sérgio Moro, 2023. "On the economic impacts of COVID‐19: A text mining literature analysis," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 375-394, February.
    3. Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Deegan, Craig & Haque, Shamima, 2021. "Corporate human rights performance and moral power: A study of retail MNCs’ supply chains in Bangladesh," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Cuenca Botey, Luis Emilio & Célérier, Laure, 2023. "On the relentless labour of deconstructing domination logics: The case of decolonial critical accounting research in South America," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Spies-Butcher, Ben & Bryant, Gareth, 2024. "The history and future of the tax state: Possibilities for a new fiscal politics beyond neoliberalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Clarke, Lorcan, 2020. "An introduction to economic studies, health emergencies, and COVID-19," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105051, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Christian Gollier & Olivier Gossner, 2020. "Group Testing against COVID-19," Working Papers 2020-04, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics, revised 02 Apr 2020.
    8. Jae-Eun Lee & Seol-A Kwon, 2021. "A Study on the Public’s Crisis Management Efficacy and Anxiety in a Pandemic Situation—Focusing on the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Liana R Woskie & Jonathan Hennessy & Valeria Espinosa & Thomas C Tsai & Swapnil Vispute & Benjamin H Jacobson & Ciro Cattuto & Laetitia Gauvin & Michele Tizzoni & Alex Fabrikant & Krishna Gadepalli & , 2021. "Early social distancing policies in Europe, changes in mobility & COVID-19 case trajectories: Insights from Spring 2020," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Conti, G.; & Giustinelli, P.;, 2022. "For Better or Worse? Subjective Expectations and Cost-Benefit Trade-Offs in Health Behavior: An Application to Lockdown Compliance in the United Kingdom," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/14, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    11. Robert S. Pindyck, 2020. "COVID-19 and the Welfare Effects of Reducing Contagion," NBER Working Papers 27121, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Augeraud-Véron, Emmanuelle & Fabbri, Giorgio & Schubert, Katheline, 2021. "Prevention and mitigation of epidemics: Biodiversity conservation and confinement policies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Nicolò Gatti & Beatrice Retali, 2021. "Fighting the spread of Covid-19 : was the Swiss lockdown worth it?," IdEP Economic Papers 2101, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    14. Yasushi Iwamoto, 2021. "Welfare economics of managing an epidemic: an exposition," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 537-579, October.
    15. Apostol, Oana & Pop, Alina, 2019. "‘Paying taxes is losing money’: A qualitative study on institutional logics in the tax consultancy field in Romania," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-23.
    16. Graham, Cameron & Grisard, Claudine, 2019. "Rich man, poor man, beggar man, thief: Accounting and the stigma of poverty," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 32-51.
    17. Fabian Stephany & Michael Dunn & Steven Sawyer & Vili Lehdonvirta, 2020. "Distancing Bonus Or Downscaling Loss? The Changing Livelihood of Us Online Workers in Times of COVID‐19," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 561-573, July.
    18. Harvie, David & Lightfoot, Geoff & Lilley, Simon & Weir, Kenneth, 2021. "Social investment innovation and the ‘social turn’ of neoliberal finance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Haines-Doran, Tom, 2022. "Critical accounting scholarship and social movements: The case of rail privatisation in Britain," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Shenoy, Ajay & Sharma, Bhavyaa & Xu, Guanghong & Kapoor, Rolly & Rho, Haedong Aiden & Sangha, Kinpritma, 2022. "God is in the rain: The impact of rainfall-induced early social distancing on COVID-19 outbreaks," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ani:irdjom:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pranav Kumar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.internationalrasd.org/index.php/jom/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.