IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v4y2018i2p51-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drone technology for last-mile delivery in Russia: a tool to develop local markets

Author

Listed:
  • Kitonsa, H.

Abstract

As the popularity of online shopping increases, last-mile delivery is gaining more and more attention of e-commerce companies. One of the viable solutions to maximizing the benefits of such delivery and cutting its costs is the usage of the rapidly developing drone technology. However, drone delivery is associated with a number of safety and privacy, which makes legislators uneasy about permitting the commercial use of drones. In this paper, we compare the drone regulations applied in various countries with those of Russia and analyze the criteria used to develop such regulations. Six general approaches are thus outlined: officially banning commercial drone operation; making it virtually impossible for drone operators to acquire the necessary registration and license; allowing to fly drones in exceptional cases over restricted areas; prohibiting to fly drones beyond the pilot’s line of visual sight; allowing to fly drones if standard requirements are met; and, finally, following the substantial precedent principle. This analysis shows us the possible strategies Russia could adopt to regulate commercial drone usage. It is thus suggested that Russia should follow the example of Rwanda and China and allow to experiment with drone delivery in rural areas, where the risk to people’s lives and property in case of drone malfunction are lower than in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitonsa, H., 2018. "Drone technology for last-mile delivery in Russia: a tool to develop local markets," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 4(2), pages 51-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:2:p:51-58
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2018.4.2.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/61735
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2018.4.2.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ann Melissa Campbell & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2005. "Decision Support for Consumer Direct Grocery Initiatives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 313-327, August.
    2. Ryan L. Skiver & Michael Godfrey, 2017. "Crowdserving: A Last Mile Delivery Method For Brick-And-Mortar Retailers," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 11(2), pages 67-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:iim:iimawp:14638 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ji, Chenlu & Mandania, Rupal & Liu, Jiyin & Liret, Anne, 2022. "Scheduling on-site service deliveries to minimise the risk of missing appointment times," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Stacy A. Voccia & Ann Melissa Campbell & Barrett W. Thomas, 2019. "The Same-Day Delivery Problem for Online Purchases," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 167-184, February.
    4. Azi, Nabila & Gendreau, Michel & Potvin, Jean-Yves, 2010. "An exact algorithm for a vehicle routing problem with time windows and multiple use of vehicles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 756-763, May.
    5. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Campbell, Ann Melissa, 2014. "Customer acceptance mechanisms for home deliveries in metropolitan areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 193-207.
    7. Koch, Sebastian & Klein, Robert, 2020. "Route-based approximate dynamic programming for dynamic pricing in attended home delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 633-652.
    8. Jean-François Cordeau & Manuel Iori & Dario Vezzali, 2024. "An updated survey of attended home delivery and service problems with a focus on applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(2), pages 885-922, December.
    9. Agatz, N.A.H. & Campbell, A.M. & Fleischmann, M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Savelsbergh, M.W.P., 2008. "Demand Management Opportunities in E-fulfillment: What Internet Retailers Can Learn from Revenue Management," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-021-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Pedro Amorim & Nicole DeHoratius & Fredrik Eng-Larsson & Sara Martins, 2024. "Customer Preferences for Delivery Service Attributes in Attended Home Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7559-7578, November.
    11. Strauss, Arne & Gülpınar, Nalan & Zheng, Yijun, 2021. "Dynamic pricing of flexible time slots for attended home delivery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1022-1041.
    12. Fleckenstein, David & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2023. "Recent advances in integrating demand management and vehicle routing: A methodological review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 499-518.
    13. Andrew Lim & Xingwen Zhang, 2007. "A Two-Stage Heuristic with Ejection Pools and Generalized Ejection Chains for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 443-457, August.
    14. Marlin W. Ulmer & Barrett W. Thomas, 2019. "Enough Waiting for the Cable Guy—Estimating Arrival Times for Service Vehicle Routing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 897-916, May.
    15. Catherine Cleophas & Jan Ehmke, 2014. "When Are Deliveries Profitable?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(3), pages 153-163, June.
    16. van der Hagen, L. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Spliet, R. & Visser, T.R. & Kok, A.L., 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Feasibility Checks for Dynamic Time Slot Management," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2022-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    17. Chen, Rui & Jia, Shuai & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Dynamic container drayage booking and routing decision support approach for E-commerce platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Lang, Magdalena A.K. & Cleophas, Catherine & Ehmke, Jan Fabian, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision making in dynamic slotting for attended home deliveries," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Niels Agatz & Ann Campbell & Moritz Fleischmann & Martin Savelsbergh, 2011. "Time Slot Management in Attended Home Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 435-449, August.
    20. Magdalena A. K. Lang & Catherine Cleophas & Jan Fabian Ehmke, 2021. "Anticipative Dynamic Slotting for Attended Home Deliveries," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-39, December.
    21. Xiaolong Guo & Ben Li & Yan Liu & Liang Liang, 2017. "Eliminating the Inconvenience of Carrying: Optimal Pricing of Delivery Service for Retailers," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 181-191, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:2:p:51-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.