IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/manmar/vxxiy2023i2p229-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barbie’S Success In The New Business Era: Technology, Innovation And Performance. The Mattel Case

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra IOANID Author-Workplace-Name1: National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Author-Workplace-Name2: Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania
  • Denisa ILIESCU

    (National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The success of the companies is credited to their capacity to generate change, developing or implementing new systems while it is admitted that success in the production area is based on monitoring the latest technologies and their transformation into viable products, on understanding current and future customer’s needs which can be satisfied with new or improved processes and products, taking into consideration the alignment with the uniqueness of the specifications or permanent adaptation to the market conditions. Companies need a long-term vision with the purpose of covering the demand through technology and generating new needs through research and development. This paper focus is on the technology-innovation-performance triadic model which is both a novel approach and a new integrative analysis. Trying to bridge the literature gap, the article proposes a discussion exploring the possible inter-links between the three elements of the triad. The results of this endeavor are twofold encouraging: (i) by underlying the investigation the potential of the triadic model technology-innovation-performance; and (ii) by implications for business managers, in general, and (in this particular case), for managers while making strategic decisions, considering the organization level. Mattel is a leading toy manufacturer which operates on a global level but also an entertainment corporation which aims to expand the content, the consumer products and to offer unique digital experiences. The company has been founded in more than 70 years ago in the United States and is operating in 35 countries through its own stores while offering their products to the public from more than 150 countries through accredited partners or resellers. The iconic Barbie doll and the famous Hot Wheels represent two of their most valuable brands, the products under this label being a subject to constant innovations during the time and succeeding to be considered the best-selling toys of the year for two consecutive years in a row, 2020 and 2021 while also being named the top global toy property. The currents study has the purpose to analyze the connection between innovation, technology and performance by highlighting the main elements that have conducted Mattel to the astonishing success which was achieved in the last years.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra IOANID Author-Workplace-Name1: National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania Author-Workplace-Name2: Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Roma, 2023. "Barbie’S Success In The New Business Era: Technology, Innovation And Performance. The Mattel Case," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 229-240, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xxi:y:2023:i:2:p:229-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mnmk.ro/documents/2023_2/3-4-2-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ardito, Lorenzo & Raby, Simon & Albino, Vito & Bertoldi, Bernardo, 2021. "The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 44-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed T. Abusharbeh, 2024. "Technology-Profitability Paradox in Banking Sector: Evidence from Palestine," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14855-14873, September.
    2. Shi Yin & Yuanyuan Yu & Nan Zhang, 2024. "The Effect of Digital Green Strategic Orientation On Digital Green Innovation Performance: From the Perspective of Digital Green Business Model Innovation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    3. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Radicic, Dragana & Petković, Saša, 2023. "Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Lee, Min-Jae & Kim, Yanghee & Roh, Taewoo, 2024. "Exploring the role of digital servitization for green innovation: Absorptive capacity, transformative capacity, and environmental strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    7. Xiue Zhang & Qiao Meng & Yuan Le, 2022. "How Do New Ventures Implementing Green Innovation Strategy Achieve Performance Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Jefferson Leandro Schmidt & Simone Sehnem & Juliano Danilo Spuldaro, 2024. "Blockchain and the transition to the circular economy: A literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2010-2032, May.
    9. Kun Wang & Bing Chen & Yuhong Li, 2024. "Technological, process or managerial innovation? How does digital transformation affect green innovation in industrial enterprises?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Jana Hojnik & Viktor Prokop & Jan Stejskal, 2022. "R&D as bridge to sustainable development? Case of Czech Republic and Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 146-160, January.
    11. Fairouz Mustafa & Suman Lodh & Monomita Nandy & Vikas Kumar, 2022. "Coupling of cryptocurrency trading with the sustainable environmental goals: Is it on the cards?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1152-1168, March.
    12. Arranz, Carlos F.A. & Arroyabe, Marta F. & Arranz, Nieves & de Arroyabe, Juan Carlos Fernandez, 2023. "Digitalisation dynamics in SMEs: An approach from systems dynamics and artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Isotilia Costa Melo & Paulo Nocera Alves Junior & Geandra Alves Queiroz & Wilfredo Yushimito & Jordi Pereira, 2023. "Do We Consider Sustainability When We Measure Small and Medium Enterprises’ (SMEs’) Performance Passing through Digital Transformation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    14. Su Nan & Yu Meiling, 2024. "How to Warranty the Sustainability of a Company’s Digital Transformation Base on the Case of Chi Forest," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 3557-3567.
    15. Li, Ganglei & Shao, Yunfei, 2023. "How do top management team characteristics affect digital orientation? Exploring the internal driving forces of firm digitalization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Lorenzo Ardito, 2023. "The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5252-5272, December.
    17. Agata Marcysiak & Żanna Pleskacz, 2021. "Determinants of digitization in SMEs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(1), pages 300-318, September.
    18. Maria Kamariotou & Fotis Kitsios, 2024. "Information systems and strategy-as-practice in the digital era: an artificial neural network model for SMEs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Chiara Franco & Filomena Pietrovito, 2024. "Drivers of firms’ digital activities in response to the Covid-19 pandemic," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(3), pages 695-726, September.
    20. Nieto, María Jesús & Santamaria, Luis & Bammens, Yannick, 2023. "Digitalization as a facilitator of open innovation: Are family firms different?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation management; performance management; technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xxi:y:2023:i:2:p:229-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Barbu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.