IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/report/v7y2024i1p28-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Ad Abstinence Behaviors of YouTube Viewers: A Study on the Students of University of Barishal

Author

Listed:
  • Most. Sharmin Sultana

    (Department of Marketing, University of Barishal, Barishal -8254, Bangladesh.)

  • Tasmin Jahan

    (Department of Marketing, University of Barishal, Barishal -8254, Bangladesh.)

  • Md. Sakib Hossain

    (Department of Marketing, University of Barishal, Barishal -8254, Bangladesh.)

Abstract

Online advertising has expanded quickly in the modern era to draw in a large number of targeted consumers. One of the most widely used venues for marketers and advertisers to promote their brands, goods, or services is YouTube. However, because most consumers prefer to ignore or bypass YouTube commercials, some are seen to be inefficient in influencing consumer purchase behavior. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the variables affecting YouTube users' ad abstention behavior. It talked about the six criteria used in YouTube advertisements, which were disturbing, incredulity of ad message, ad clutter, time consuming, perceived unnecessariness, and interruptive to work. This study used an online survey and quantitative research methods to examine the problem statement with the goal of comprehending an individual's viewpoints. 140 individuals who have first-hand experience with YouTube streaming provided the data. The analysis of the collected data was done with SPSS version 22. Among the statistical techniques used were multiple regression analysis, correlation, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, and hypothesis testing. The results demonstrated that all the six factors have a significant impact on the ad abstention behavior of YouTube viewers. Disturbance, time consumption, work interruption, ad clutter and perceived unnecessariness are thought to be the principal factors that should be taken into account when evaluating the effectiveness of YouTube commercials. The study's conclusions are important from a theoretical and practical standpoint.

Suggested Citation

  • Most. Sharmin Sultana & Tasmin Jahan & Md. Sakib Hossain, 2024. "Factors Influencing Ad Abstinence Behaviors of YouTube Viewers: A Study on the Students of University of Barishal," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 7(1), pages 28-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:28-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1042.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/jsr-volume-7-issue-1-2/7101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Rejoinder--Implications of "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness"," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 413-415, 05-06.
    2. Amir Abedini Koshksaray & Elnaz Nabizadeh, 2017. "Internet Advertising Pleasure and Purchase Intention," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 8(4), pages 30-47, October.
    3. Calder, Bobby J. & Malthouse, Edward C. & Schaedel, Ute, 2009. "An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 321-331.
    4. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine Tucker, 2011. "Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 389-404, 05-06.
    5. Chakraborty, Soumyakanti & Basu, Sumanta & Ray, Saibal & Sharma, Megha, 2021. "Advertisement revenue management: Determining the optimal mix of skippable and non-skippable ads for online video sharing platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(1), pages 213-229.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Waqas & Zalfa Laili Hamzah & Noor Akma Mohd Salleh, 2022. "Branded content experience in social media settings: a consumer culture theory perspective," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 225-240, March.
    2. Shun-Yang Lee & Julian Runge & Daniel Yoo & Yakov Bart & Anett Gyurak & J. W. Schneider, 2023. "COVID-19 Demand Shocks Revisited: Did Advertising Technology Help Mitigate Adverse Consequences for Small and Midsize Businesses?," Papers 2307.09035, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan & Feijoo, Claudio & Gómez Barroso, Jose-Luis, 2015. "The supply of personal information: A study on the determinants of information provision in e-commerce scenarios," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127174, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Yanwen Wang & Chunhua Wu & Ting Zhu, 2019. "Mobile Hailing Technology and Taxi Driving Behaviors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 734-755, September.
    5. Seung-Hyun Lee & Hee Jin Mun & Kyung Min Park, 2015. "When is dependence on other organizations burdensome? The effect of asymmetric dependence on internet firm failure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2058-2074, December.
    6. Joo, Mingyu & Kim, Seung Hyun & Ghose, Anindya & Wilbur, Kenneth C., 2023. "Designing Distributed Ledger technologies, like Blockchain, for advertising markets," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 12-21.
    7. Jens Prüfer & Christoph Schottmüller, 2021. "Competing with Big Data," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 967-1008, December.
    8. Michael North & Michael Ficorilli, 2017. "Click me: an examination of the impact size, color, and design has on banner advertisements generating clicks," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 99-108, September.
    9. Eric M. Schwartz & Eric T. Bradlow & Peter S. Fader, 2017. "Customer Acquisition via Display Advertising Using Multi-Armed Bandit Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 500-522, July.
    10. Mariia I. Okuneva & Dmitriy B. Potapov, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Individual Targeting Through Smartphone Application in Retail: Evidence from Field Experiment," HSE Working papers WP BRP 47/MAN/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    11. Randall Lewis & Dan Nguyen, 2015. "Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 93-115, June.
    12. Harikesh S. Nair & Sanjog Misra & William J. Hornbuckle IV & Ranjan Mishra & Anand Acharya, 2017. "Big Data and Marketing Analytics in Gaming: Combining Empirical Models and Field Experimentation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 699-725, September.
    13. Henk Kox & Bas Straathof & Gijsbert Zwart, 2017. "Targeted advertising, platform competition, and privacy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 557-570, September.
    14. Mark A. P. Davies, 2018. "Using time in branding: reflections and orientations in an increasingly competitive world," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 93-100, March.
    15. Potoglou, Dimitris & Palacios, Juan-Francisco & Feijóo, Claudio, 2015. "An integrated latent variable and choice model to explore the role of privacy concern on stated behavioural intentions in e-commerce," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 10-27.
    16. Kannan, P.K. & Li, Hongshuang “Alice”, 2017. "Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-45.
    17. Paramveer S. Dhillon & Sinan Aral, 2021. "Modeling Dynamic User Interests: A Neural Matrix Factorization Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1059-1080, November.
    18. Morlok, Tina & Matt, Christian & Hess, Thomas, 2017. "Privatheitsforschung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Entwicklung, Stand und Perspektiven," Working Papers 1/2017, University of Munich, Munich School of Management, Institute for Information Systems and New Media.
    19. Bleier, Alexander & Goldfarb, Avi & Tucker, Catherine, 2020. "Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 466-480.
    20. K. Sudhir & Seung Yoon Lee & Subroto Roy, 2021. "Lookalike Targeting on Others' Journeys: Brand Versus Performance Marketing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2302R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jun 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:28-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.