IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/weecfo/339601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viewsheds and Recreation Demand: Approaches for Capturing Visual Qualities of the Landscape Post-Fire

Author

Listed:
  • Kolstoe, Sonja H.
  • Kaminski, Abigail R.
  • Maher, Anna T.

Abstract

Spatial data metrics are commonly used to capture environmental quality for recreation and visitation studies. Spatial data and tools, such as viewshed analysis, provide methods to incorporate spatial attributes into nonmarket valuation studies of consumer preferences, like portraying changes in visual-sensory qualities (e.g., from wildfires). We review the use of viewsheds in the nonmarket valuation literature and summarize insights from viewshed-based studies in other disciplines. We offer a conceptual framework for how to incorporate viewsheds into recreation demand studies, including to capture post-fire landscape changes. We discuss recent innovations in methods and data and identify avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kolstoe, Sonja H. & Kaminski, Abigail R. & Maher, Anna T., 2023. "Viewsheds and Recreation Demand: Approaches for Capturing Visual Qualities of the Landscape Post-Fire," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:weecfo:339601
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339601/files/Sonja%20H.%20Kolstoe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hilger, James & Englin, Jeffrey, 2009. "Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment: Forest fire impacts on recreational values and use," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 287-298, November.
    2. Wood, Spencer A & Winder, Samantha & Lia, Emilia & White, Eric & Crowley, Christian & Milnor, Adam, 2020. "Next-generation Visitation Models using Social Media to Estimate Recreation on Public Lands," SocArXiv 4wm97, Center for Open Science.
    3. Baerenklau, Kenneth A. & González-Cabán, Armando & Paez, Catrina & Chavez, Edgar, 2010. "Spatial allocation of forest recreation value," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 113-126, April.
    4. Paul Hindsley & Stuart Hamilton & O. Morgan, 2013. "Gulf Views: Toward a Better Understanding of Viewshed Scope in Hedonic Property Models," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 489-505, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kolstoe, Sonja H. & Kaminski, Abigail R. & Maher, Anna T., 2023. "Viewsheds and Recreation Demand: Approaches for Capturing Visual Qualities of the Landscape Post-Fire," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), September.
    2. Sánchez, José J. & Baerenklau, Ken & González-Cabán, Armando, 2016. "Valuing hypothetical wildfire impacts with a Kuhn–Tucker model of recreation demand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 63-70.
    3. Garnache, Cloe & Lupi, Frank, 2018. "The Thomas Fire and the Effect of Wildfires on the Value of Recreation Services in Southern California," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274028, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Richard Yao & David Palmer & Barbara Hock & Duncan Harrison & Tim Payn & Juan Monge, 2019. "Forest Investment Framework as a Support Tool for the Sustainable Management of Planted Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Agimass, Fitalew & Lundhede, Thomas & Panduro, Toke Emil & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl, 2018. "The choice of forest site for recreation: A revealed preference analysis using spatial data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 445-454.
    6. Wiktor Budziński & Danny Campbell & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Urška Demšar & Nick Hanley, 2018. "Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 606-626, September.
    7. Pahrudin Pahrudin & Li-Wei Liu & Shao-Yu Li, 2022. "What Is the Role of Tourism Management and Marketing toward Sustainable Tourism? A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Gellman, Jacob & Walls, Margaret & Wibbenmeyer, Matthew, 2022. "Wildfire, smoke, and outdoor recreation in the western United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Liu, Hongxiao & Hamel, Perrine & Tardieu, Léa & Remme, Roy P. & Han, Baolong & Ren, Hai, 2022. "A geospatial model of nature-based recreation for urban planning: Case study of Paris, France," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Abildtrup, Jens & Garcia, Serge & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Stenger, Anne, 2013. "Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 67-77.
    11. Mikołaj Czajkowski & Wiktor Budziński & Danny Campbell & Marek Giergiczny & Nick Hanley, 2017. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(3), pages 705-727, November.
    12. Richards, Daniel Rex & Lavorel, Sandra, 2022. "Integrating social media data and machine learning to analyse scenarios of landscape appreciation," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    13. Lee, Heera & Seo, Bumsuk & Cord, Anna F. & Volk, Martin & Lautenbach, Sven, 2022. "Using crowdsourced images to study selected cultural ecosystem services and their relationships with species richness and carbon sequestration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Jones, Thomas E. & Yang, Yang & Yamamoto, Kiyotatsu, 2017. "Assessing the recreational value of world heritage site inscription: A longitudinal travel cost analysis of Mount Fuji climbers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 67-78.
    15. Léa Tardieu & Laetitia Tufféry, 2019. "From supply to demand factors : what are the determinants of attractiveness for outdoor recreation?," Post-Print hal-02883545, HAL.
    16. Andrew Bechard, 2021. "Gone with the Wind: Declines in Property Values as Harmful Algal Blooms Are Blown Towards the Shore," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 242-257, February.
    17. Hellström, Jörgen & Nordström, Jonas, 2012. "Demand and welfare effects in recreational travel models: Accounting for substitution between number of trips and days to stay," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 446-456.
    18. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Nunes, Luis C., 2022. "Fire takes no vacation: impact of fires on tourism," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 86-101, February.
    19. Manley, Kyle & Nyelele, Charity & Egoh, Benis N., 2022. "A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Tuffery, Laetitia, 2017. "The recreational services value of the nearby periurban forest versus the regional forest environment," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 33-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:weecfo:339601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.