IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersja/136865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the PIK Program on the Farm Machinery Market

Author

Listed:
  • Kuchler, Fred
  • Vroomen, Harry

Abstract

Many analysts have claimed the record number of crop acres taken out of production in 1983 as a result of the Payment-in-Kind (PIK) program affected the already dechnmg sales offarm tractors The authors use intervention analysis, a particular form of a transfer function, to model and test for hypothesized changes in processes Three time senes (two two-wheel drive monthly sales classifications and one four-wheel drive sales classification).were modeled· as unwariate Autoregressive-Integrated-Moving-Average (ARIMA) processes These models were modified to incorporate the expected form of the PIK effects Results showed that PIK stgmficantly reduced unit sales of four-wheel drive tractors, but there was no statistical evidence of reduced sales for two-wheel drive tractors

Suggested Citation

  • Kuchler, Fred & Vroomen, Harry, 1987. "Impacts of the PIK Program on the Farm Machinery Market," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 39(3), pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:136865
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.136865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/136865/files/Kuchler_Vroomen_39_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.136865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Hogan, 1984. "Evaluating the demographic impact of societal events through intervention analysis: The brown vs. Board of Education decision," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 21(4), pages 673-677, November.
    2. Larcker, David F. & Gordon, Lawrence A. & Pinches, George E., 1980. "Testing for Market Efficiency: A Comparison of the Cumulative Average Residual Methodology and Intervention Analysis," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 267-287, June.
    3. John B. Penson & Robert F. J. Romain & Dean W. Hughes, 1981. "Net Investment in Farm Tractors: An Econometric Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 629-635.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Canning, Patrick N. & Vroomen, Harry, 1994. "Welfare Impacts of a Trade Restriction: An Equilibrium Approach and Application in the Potash Industry," Technical Bulletins 156762, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perry Warjiyo & Wallace E. Huffman, 1997. "Dynamic input demand functions and resource adjustment for US agriculture: state evidence," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2-3), pages 223-237, December.
    2. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    3. Canning, Patrick N. & Vroomen, Harry, 1994. "Welfare Impacts of a Trade Restriction: An Equilibrium Approach and Application in the Potash Industry," Technical Bulletins 156762, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Kentaka Aruga, 2014. "An intervention analysis on the Tokyo Grain Exchange non-genetically modified and conventional soybean futures markets," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Vasavada, Utpal & Ball, V. Eldon, 1988. "Modeling Dynamic Adjustment In A Multi-Output Framework," Staff Reports 278021, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Tsigas, Marinos E. & Hertel, Thomas W., 1989. "Testing Dynamic Models Of The Farm Firm," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Penson, John B. & Chen, Dean T., 1988. "Design and Application of a Structural General Equilibrium Model to Farm Policy Analysis," Staff Reports 257926, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    8. Hardin, Erin M. & Penson, John B., 2017. "Ability to Pay and Agriculture Sector Stability," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252829, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Fiammetta Menchetti & Fabrizio Cipollini & Fabrizia Mealli, 2023. "Combining counterfactual outcomes and ARIMA models for policy evaluation," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-24.
    10. Lefebvre, Marianne & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio & Viaggi, Davide, 2014. "EU farmers' intentions to invest in 2014-2020: complementarity between asset classes," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182737, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Michael J. Gombola & Douglas R. Kahl & Kenneth P. Nunn Jr., 1988. "Valuation Of The Preferred Stock Sinking Fund Feature: A Time-Series Approach," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 11(1), pages 33-42, March.
    12. Conway, Roger & Hrubovcak, James & LeBlanc, Michael, 1985. "The Structure of Agricultural Investment: Comparing a Flexible Accelerator with Stochastic Coefficients," Technical Bulletins 157016, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Abebe, Kassahun & Dahl, Dale C. & Olson, Kent D., 1990. "How Good Are Input Demand Models Used In Previous Studies Now?," Staff Papers 13587, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    14. Michael Cichello & Douglas Lamdin, 2006. "Event Studies and the Analysis of Antitrust," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 229-245.
    15. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Miranowski, John A. & Morehart, Mitchell J, 1989. "Investments in Soil Conservation and Land Improvements: Factors Explaining Farmers' Decisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 308064, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Debertin, David L. & Johnson, William L., 1982. "An Econometric Analysis Of Qualitative Choice Among Performance Characteristics Of Agricultureal Tractors," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Boardman, Anthony & Vertinsky, Ilan & Whistler, Diana, 1997. "Using information diffusion models to estimate the impacts of regulatory events on publicly traded firms," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 283-300, January.
    18. Lamdin, Douglas J., 2001. "Implementing and interpreting event studies of regulatory changes," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2-3), pages 171-183.
    19. Penson, John B. & Taylor, C. Robert, 1990. "Modeling the Interface Between Agriculture and the General Economy," Working Papers 258042, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    20. D. N. Cooper, 1994. "Net Investment In Agricultural Tractors," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 339-350, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersja:136865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.