IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/149102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Welfare Effects of Quantity Changes in Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Kuo S.

Abstract

Information about consumer welfare effects associated with quantity changes in demand is important for agricultural and food policy decision-makers because many policy options are directly related to controlling supplies as a means to stabilize or raise commodity prices and farmers’ income. A new method is developed to measure the consumer welfare effects by using the estimates of an inverse demand system and a modified quantity-adjusted Malmquist index to represent the efficiency in quantity metric welfare. The methodology is validated by applying it to a U.S. inverse food demand system consisting of 13 food groups and a nonfood sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Kuo S., 2013. "Consumer Welfare Effects of Quantity Changes in Demand," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 1-11, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:149102
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149102/files/jaae577.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.149102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline L. Freund & Christine I. Wallich, 1996. "The Welfare Effects of Raising Household Energy Prices in Poland," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 53-77.
    2. Waugh, Frederick V., 1964. "Demand and Price Analysis: Some Examples from Agriculture," Technical Bulletins 171213, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. McLaren, Keith Robert & Wong, K. K. Gary, 2009. "AJAE appendix for The Benefit Function Approach to Modeling Price-Dependent Demand Systems: An Application of Duality Theory," American Journal of Agricultural Economics APPENDICES, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1-2, January.
    4. Angus Deaton, 1979. "The Distance Function in Consumer Behaviour with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 46(3), pages 391-405.
    5. James P. Houck, 1965. "The Relationship of Direct Price Flexibilities to Direct Price Elasticities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 47(3), pages 789-792.
    6. Matthew C. Stockton & Oral Capps Jr. & David A. Bessler, 2008. "Samuelson´s full duality and the use of directed acyclical graphs," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 11, pages 167-191, May.
    7. Kuo S. Huang & Sophia Wu Huang, 2012. "Consumer welfare effects of increased food and energy prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(19), pages 2527-2536, July.
    8. Fox, Karl A., 1953. "The Analysis of Demand for Farm Products," Technical Bulletins 156646, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Jason H. Grant & Dayton M. Lambert & Kenneth A. Foster, 2010. "A Seasonal Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System for North American Fresh Tomatoes," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 58(2), pages 215-234, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornell, Laurence D. & Sorenson, Vernon L., 1986. "Implications of Structural Change in U.S. Demand for Meat on U.S. Livestock and Grain Markets," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201355, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. Hancock, P. J. & Nieuwoudt, W. L. & Lyne, M. C., 1984. "Demand Analysis Of Meats In South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 23(2), October.
    3. Friend, Reed E., 1971. "Use of Wheat for Feed in the European Economic Community, with Projections to 1975," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Probst, Joel Keith, 1982. "Monthly cattle supply and price forecasting models," ISU General Staff Papers 1982010108000018043, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Chris Moore & Charles Griffiths, 2018. "Welfare analysis in a two-stage inverse demand model: an application to harvest changes in the Chesapeake Bay," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1181-1206, November.
    6. Ortmann, G. F., 1982. "Demand Analysis Of Vegetables And Subtropical Fruit In South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    7. Baumes, Harry S., Jr. & Conway, Roger K., 1985. "An Econometric Model Of The U.S. Apple Market," Staff Reports 277669, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Nicholls, Albert W. & Kuehn, John P., 1980. "Changes In The Elasticity Of Demand For Fresh Choice Beef, 1950-1978," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-3, April.
    9. Walter Labys, 2005. "Commodity Price Fluctuations: A Century of Analysis," Working Papers Working Paper 2005-01, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    10. Eric Sjöberg, 2015. "Pricing on the Fish Market--Does Size Matter?," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 277-296.
    11. repec:rri:wpaper:200501 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Stuckey, John A. & Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Demand Analysis of the Sydney Banana Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(01), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Mann, Jitendar S. & St. George, George E., 1978. "Estimates of Elasticities for Food Demand in the United States," Technical Bulletins 157867, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Abdoul G. Sam & Babatunde O. Abidoye & Sihle Mashaba, 2021. "Climate change and household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical evidence from Swaziland," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 439-455, April.
    16. Miller, Stephen E. & Kahl, Kandice H. & Rathwell, P. James, 2000. "Revenue Insurance For Georgia And South Carolina Peaches," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.
    17. Manchester, Alden C., 1992. "Rearranging The Economic Landscape: The Food Marketing Revolution, 1950-91," Agricultural Economic Reports 308263, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Fleurbaey, Marc & Maniquet, François, 2017. "Fairness and well-being measurement," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 119-126.
    19. Sean Pascoe & Peggy Schrobback & Eriko Hoshino & Robert Curtotti, 2023. "Impact of changes in imports and farmed salmon on wild-caught fish prices in Australia," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 335-359.
    20. Borrell, Brent, 1991. "How a change in Brazil's sugar policies would affect the world sugar market," Policy Research Working Paper Series 642, The World Bank.
    21. Donald Bruce & William Fox & Matthew Murray, 2003. "To Tax Or Not To Tax? The Case Of Electronic Commerce," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(1), pages 25-40, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:149102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.