IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlorco/249778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in a Kibbutz Plant's Life Cycle Induced by Cultural Change

Author

Listed:
  • Moskovich, Yaffa
  • Achouch, Yuval

Abstract

This is an organizational life cycle case study of a kibbutz industrial plant and its cultural features. The plant began as a new enterprise, in a new area of manufacturing magnets. Gradually, the plant evolved and grew, but socialist management problems and environmental competition interfered with its existence. The plant passed into a decline stage, and finally was shut down and acquired by a new private owner. The life cycle changes were accompanied by major changes in the plant’s organizational culture. From a socialist entity based on democratic values, it transformed into a hierarchic organization with social stratification.

Suggested Citation

  • Moskovich, Yaffa & Achouch, Yuval, 2014. "Changes in a Kibbutz Plant's Life Cycle Induced by Cultural Change," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 42(2), pages 1-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:249778
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.249778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/249778/files/06%20Changes%20in%20a%20Kibbutz%20Plant_s%20Life%20Cycle.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.249778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moskovich, Yaffa & Achouch, Yuval, 2013. "From Collectivism to Capitalism: Cultural Change in a Kibbutz Factory in Israel," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 41(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Miller, Danny, 1992. "The icarus paradox: How exceptional companies bring about their own downfall," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 24-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muel Kaptein, 2023. "A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 297-316, April.
    2. Ayamga, Matthew & Annosi, Maria Carmela & Kassahun, Ayalew & Dolfsma, Wilfred & Tekinerdogan, Bedir, 2024. "Adaptive organizational responses to varied types of failures: Empirical insights from technology providers in Ghana," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Dena Lawrence & Federica Pazzaglia & Karan Sonpar, 2011. "The Introduction of a Non-Traditional and Aggressive Approach to Banking: The Risks of Hubris," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 401-420, September.
    4. Davar Azarmi, 2016. "Factors Affecting Technology Innovation and Its Commercialisation in Firms," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(7), pages 1-36, July.
    5. Mohammed Hossain & Yasean A. Tahat & Naser AbuGhazaleh, 2024. "Unlocking the Sustainable Workplace Equality Policy (SWEP): Evidence from an Emerging Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Gras, David & Mendoza-Abarca, Karla I., 2014. "Risky business? The survival implications of exploiting commercial opportunities by nonprofits," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 392-404.
    7. Blume, Brian D. & Covin, Jeffrey G., 2011. "Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process: Do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say that they do?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 137-151, January.
    8. Shepherd, Dean A. & Covin, Jeffrey G. & Kuratko, Donald F., 2009. "Project failure from corporate entrepreneurship: Managing the grief process," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 588-600, November.
    9. Yaffa Moskovich, 2020. "Family Home Business in Kibbutz Industry Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Aurélien Acquier & Cedric Dalmasso, 2013. "Combining Strategic Agility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the need for Resource Sensitivity," Post-Print hal-01487685, HAL.
    11. Yunshi Liu & Linda Wang & Li Zhao & David Ahlstrom, 2013. "Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1059-1086, December.
    12. Lee, Seung-Hyun & Beamish, Paul W. & Lee, Ho-Uk & Park, Jong-Hun, 2009. "Strategic choice during economic crisis: Domestic market position, organizational capabilities and export flexibility," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. DeTienne, Dawn R. & Shepherd, Dean A. & De Castro, Julio O., 2008. "The fallacy of "only the strong survive": The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 528-546, September.
    14. Balaji Abraham & Rohit Kumar, 2020. "Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd: Searching Its Glorious Days," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(3), pages 359-374, December.
    15. Ralph W. Adler, 1996. "Exploring the Seeds of Organisational Decline," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 6(12), pages 24-36, September.
    16. Zachary Sheaffer & Rita Mano‐Negrin, 2003. "Executives’ Orientations as Indicators of Crisis Management Policies and Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 573-606, March.
    17. Leonhard Dobusch & Elke Schüßler, 2013. "Theorizing path dependence: a review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(3), pages 617-647, June.
    18. Ryszard Praszkier & Agata Zabłocka, 2022. "The perception of doability and how is it measured," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 21(1), pages 51-62, June.
    19. Richard J. Arend, 2008. "Differences in RBV strategic factors and the need to consider opposing factors in turnaround outcomes," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 337-355.
    20. Roy Suddaby & Diego Coraiola & Charles Harvey & William Foster, 2020. "History and the micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 530-556, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlorco:249778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caehuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.