IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/14669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implan Understates Agricultural Input-Output Multipliers: An Application To Potential Agricultural/Green Industry Drought Impacts In Colorado

Author

Listed:
  • McKean, John R.
  • Spencer, William P.

Abstract

Synthesized input-output models are widely used by industry and government economists. The IMPLAN program is popular because it provides user access to the base data so that modifications can be made. The Washington survey-based model and IMPLAN for Washington State are compared, and differences in multipliers are traced to differences in final payments leakages. An adjustment technique for IMPLAN is demonstrated. An application is made to a Colorado potential drought impact analysis. More than 51,000 part- and full-time jobs and $1.6 billion of household income are at stake in the Colorado farm and "green industry" sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • McKean, John R. & Spencer, William P., 2003. "Implan Understates Agricultural Input-Output Multipliers: An Application To Potential Agricultural/Green Industry Drought Impacts In Colorado," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 21(2), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14669
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14669/files/21020231.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    2. Radtke, Hans & Detering, Stan & Brokken, Ray F., 1985. "A Comparison Of Economic Impact Estimates For Changes In The Federal Grazing Fee: Secondary Vs. Primary Data I/O Models," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. R. Keith Schwer & Dan S. Rickman, 1995. "A comparison of the multipliers of IMPLAN, REMI, and RIMS II: Benchmarking ready-made models for comparison," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 29(4), pages 363-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuyen PHAM, 2024. "Catalyzing Economic And Environmental Insights: Applications Of Implan'S Environmentally Extended Input-Output (Eeio) Modeling For Energy Production Scenarios," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 99-106, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomassin, Paul & Andison, Allan, 1987. "Agriculture Canada's Input-Output Model Part 1: Disaggregation of the Agriculture Sector," Working Papers 243875, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    2. Amaral Haddad, Eduardo & Cotarelli, Natália & Simonato, Thiago & Vale, Vinicius & Coelho Visentin, Jaqueline, 2018. "Estimation of NUTS2 Interregional Input-Output Systems for Greece, 2010 and 2013," TD NEREUS 3-2018, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    3. Kenneth Button, 2016. "The political economy of shipping US food and aid under the cargo preference regime," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(4), pages 353-370, December.
    4. Christelle Khalaf & G. Jason Jolley & Candi Clouse, 2022. "The Economic Impact of Small Colleges on Local Economies: A Guide to Attainable Data and Best Practices," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 17-32, February.
    5. Rickman, Dan & Wang, Hongbo, 2020. "Assessing State Economic Development from Motion Picture and Television Production Incentives: Standardizing the Industry for Analysis," MPRA Paper 104052, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. James A. Giesecke & John R. Madden, 2013. "Evidence-based regional economic policy analysis: the role of CGE modelling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 285-301.
    7. Fenstemacher, Kory Alan & Fisher, Jared Harrison & Hadzalic, Zerina & Hillebrandt, Brenda, 2019. "Estimating the Economic Impact of Increases in the Minimum Wage," SocArXiv xduw4, Center for Open Science.
    8. John Loomis & Lynne Caughlan, 2006. "The Importance of Adjusting for Trip Purpose in Regional Economic Analyses of Tourist Destinations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(1), pages 33-43, March.
    9. Eduardo Martins, 1993. "Construction Of Regional Input-Output Tables From Establishment-Level Microdata: Illinois, 1982," Working Papers 93-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    10. Pender, John & Reeder, Richard, 2011. "Impacts of Regional Approaches to Rural Development: Initial Evidence on the Delta Regional Authority," Economic Research Report 262240, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    12. Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (Ed.), 2013. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse: Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2012," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    13. Robert W. Wassmer & Ryan S. Ong & Geoffrey Propheter, 2016. "Suggestions for the Needed Standardization of Determining the Local Economic Impact of Professional Sports," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(3), pages 252-266, August.
    14. Dan S. Rickman & R. Keith Schwer, 1993. "A Systematic Comparison Of The REMI and IMPLAN Models: The Case Of Southern Nevada," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 143-162, Fall.
    15. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer & Christopher Meyer & Gunnar Prause & Gunnar Prause, 2020. "Methodology approach on benchmarking Regional Innovation on Smart Specialisation (RIS3): a joint macro-regional tool to regional performance evaluation and monitoring in Central Europe," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1359-1385, December.
    16. Turner, Karen & Lenzen, Manfred & Wiedmann, Thomas & Barrett, John, 2007. "Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities -- Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 37-44, April.
    17. Kenneth G. Crowther & Yacov Y. Haimes, 2010. "Development of the multiregional inoperability input‐output model (MRIIM) for spatial explicitness in preparedness of interdependent regions," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 28-46, March.
    18. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    19. Adam Rose & Dan Wei & Noah Dormady, 2011. "Regional macroeconomic assessment of the Pennsylvania Climate Action Plan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 357-379, November.
    20. Mark A. Bonn & Julie Harrington, 2008. "A Comparison of Three Economic Impact Models for Applied Hospitality and Tourism Research," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(4), pages 769-789, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.