IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/14669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implan Understates Agricultural Input-Output Multipliers: An Application To Potential Agricultural/Green Industry Drought Impacts In Colorado

Author

Listed:
  • McKean, John R.
  • Spencer, William P.

Abstract

Synthesized input-output models are widely used by industry and government economists. The IMPLAN program is popular because it provides user access to the base data so that modifications can be made. The Washington survey-based model and IMPLAN for Washington State are compared, and differences in multipliers are traced to differences in final payments leakages. An adjustment technique for IMPLAN is demonstrated. An application is made to a Colorado potential drought impact analysis. More than 51,000 part- and full-time jobs and $1.6 billion of household income are at stake in the Colorado farm and "green industry" sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • McKean, John R. & Spencer, William P., 2003. "Implan Understates Agricultural Input-Output Multipliers: An Application To Potential Agricultural/Green Industry Drought Impacts In Colorado," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 21(2), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14669
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14669/files/21020231.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    2. Radtke, Hans & Detering, Stan & Brokken, Ray F., 1985. "A Comparison Of Economic Impact Estimates For Changes In The Federal Grazing Fee: Secondary Vs. Primary Data I/O Models," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. R. Keith Schwer & Dan S. Rickman, 1995. "A comparison of the multipliers of IMPLAN, REMI, and RIMS II: Benchmarking ready-made models for comparison," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 29(4), pages 363-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuyen PHAM, 2024. "Catalyzing Economic And Environmental Insights: Applications Of Implan'S Environmentally Extended Input-Output (Eeio) Modeling For Energy Production Scenarios," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 99-106, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rickman, Dan & Wang, Hongbo, 2020. "Assessing State Economic Development from Motion Picture and Television Production Incentives: Standardizing the Industry for Analysis," MPRA Paper 104052, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. James A. Giesecke & John R. Madden, 2013. "Evidence-based regional economic policy analysis: the role of CGE modelling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 285-301.
    3. John Loomis & Lynne Caughlan, 2006. "The Importance of Adjusting for Trip Purpose in Regional Economic Analyses of Tourist Destinations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 12(1), pages 33-43, March.
    4. Eduardo Martins, 1993. "Construction Of Regional Input-Output Tables From Establishment-Level Microdata: Illinois, 1982," Working Papers 93-12, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    6. Robert W. Wassmer & Ryan S. Ong & Geoffrey Propheter, 2016. "Suggestions for the Needed Standardization of Determining the Local Economic Impact of Professional Sports," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(3), pages 252-266, August.
    7. Dan S. Rickman & R. Keith Schwer, 1993. "A Systematic Comparison Of The REMI and IMPLAN Models: The Case Of Southern Nevada," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 143-162, Fall.
    8. Eduardo A. Haddad & Natalia Q. Cotarelli, Thiago C. Simonato, Vinicius A. Vale & Jaqueline C. Vicentin, 2018. "Estimation of NUTS2 Interregional Input-Output Systems for Greece, 2010 and 2013," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2018_07, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    9. Turner, Karen & Lenzen, Manfred & Wiedmann, Thomas & Barrett, John, 2007. "Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities -- Part 1: A technical note on combining input-output and ecological footprint analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 37-44, April.
    10. Choi, Jun-Ki & Eom, Jiyong & McClory, Emma, 2018. "Economic and environmental impacts of local utility-delivered industrial energy-efficiency rebate programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 289-298.
    11. Lawrence, Michael F. & Wei, Dan & Rose, Adam & Williamson, Scott & Cartwright-Smith, Devon, 2017. "Macroeconomic impacts of proposed climate change mitigation strategies for transportation in Southern California," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 56-69.
    12. Ali Jalili, 2000. "Exogenous information and input-output updating: An evaluation," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 6(1), pages 50-66, February.
    13. Manfred Lenzen & Arne Geschke & Arunima Malik & Jacob Fry & Joe Lane & Thomas Wiedmann & Steven Kenway & Khanh Hoang & Andrew Cadogan-Cowper, 2017. "New multi-regional input–output databases for Australia – enabling timely and flexible regional analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 275-295, April.
    14. Gordon Mulligan & Randall Jackson & Amanda Krugh, 2013. "Economic base multipliers: a comparison of ACDS and IMPLAN," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 289-303, August.
    15. Ricardo Gazel & R. Schwer, 1997. "Beyond Rock and Roll: The Economic Impact of the Grateful Dead on a Local Economy," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 21(1), pages 41-55, March.
    16. Adam Rose & Dan Wei & Fynnwin Prager, 2012. "Distributional Impacts Of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Alternative Allocation And Recycling Strategies In California," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 30(4), pages 603-617, October.
    17. D S Rickman & R K Schwer, 1995. "Multiplier Comparisons of the IMPLAN and REMI Models across Versions: Illuminating Black Boxes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(1), pages 143-151, January.
    18. Erik Dietzenbacher & Manfred Lenzen & Bart Los & Dabo Guan & Michael L. Lahr & Ferran Sancho & Sangwon Suh & Cuihong Yang, 2013. "Input--Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 369-389, December.
    19. Sungsoo Kim, 2021. "Assessing economic and fiscal impacts of sports complex in a small US county," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(3), pages 455-465, May.
    20. Domański Bolesław & Gwosdz Krzysztof, 2010. "Multiplier Effects in Local and Regional Development," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 27-37, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.