IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v27y1995i1p143-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiplier Comparisons of the IMPLAN and REMI Models across Versions: Illuminating Black Boxes

Author

Listed:
  • D S Rickman

    (Department of Finance and Economics and Bureau of Business Research and Economic Development, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460-8151, USA)

  • R K Schwer

    (Department of Economics and Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA)

Abstract

Despite the widespread use and several published evaluations of the IMPLAN and REMI models, the issue of how the multipliers in these models compare is unresolved. In particular, little is known about the stability of the IMPLAN and REMI multipliers across the different versions of the models. The difficulty in comparing the multipliers derives from problems in benchmarking or standardizing the models, and this problem has been compounded by the release of new versions in recent years. Therefore, in this paper the current and previous versions of the IMPLAN and REMI models are compared. It is found that apparent changes in the multipliers in each model result from undocumented or poorly documented changes in the vendor default values of the available options for calculating the multipliers, not from structural changes in the models. The use of benchmarked versions of each model in the comparison, then, provides evidence on the stability of the multipliers of the models, and forms the basis for clarifying the misinterpretations of results in some of the published evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • D S Rickman & R K Schwer, 1995. "Multiplier Comparisons of the IMPLAN and REMI Models across Versions: Illuminating Black Boxes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(1), pages 143-151, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:1:p:143-151
    DOI: 10.1068/a270143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a270143
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a270143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S Lieu & G I Treyz, 1992. "Estimating the Economic and Demographic Effects of an Air Quality Management Plan: The Case of Southern California," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(12), pages 1799-1811, December.
    2. Sue Lieu, 1991. "Regional Impacts Of Air Quality Regulation: Applying An Economic Model," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 9(3), pages 24-34, July.
    3. Radtke, Hans & Detering, Stan & Brokken, Ray F., 1985. "A Comparison Of Economic Impact Estimates For Changes In The Federal Grazing Fee: Secondary Vs. Primary Data I/O Models," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Dan S. Rickman & R. Keith Schwer, 1993. "A Systematic Comparison Of The REMI and IMPLAN Models: The Case Of Southern Nevada," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 143-162, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Rose & Dan Wei & Noah Dormady, 2011. "Regional macroeconomic assessment of the Pennsylvania Climate Action Plan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 357-379, November.
    2. Brown, Jason P. & Weber, Jeremy G. & Wojan, Timothy R., 2013. "Emerging Energy Industries and Rural Growth," Economic Research Report 262215, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Lawrence, Michael F. & Wei, Dan & Rose, Adam & Williamson, Scott & Cartwright-Smith, Devon, 2017. "Macroeconomic impacts of proposed climate change mitigation strategies for transportation in Southern California," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 56-69.
    4. Gordon Mulligan & Randall Jackson & Amanda Krugh, 2013. "Economic base multipliers: a comparison of ACDS and IMPLAN," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 289-303, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan S. Rickman & R. Keith Schwer, 1993. "A Systematic Comparison Of The REMI and IMPLAN Models: The Case Of Southern Nevada," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 143-162, Fall.
    2. Gordon Mulligan & Randall Jackson & Amanda Krugh, 2013. "Economic base multipliers: a comparison of ACDS and IMPLAN," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 289-303, August.
    3. Mark A. Bonn & Julie Harrington, 2008. "A Comparison of Three Economic Impact Models for Applied Hospitality and Tourism Research," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(4), pages 769-789, December.
    4. repec:mul:je8794:doi:10.1429/34355:y:2011:i:1:p:125 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Rickman, Dan S. & Wang, Hongbo, 2022. "Industry Aggregation and Assessment of State Economic Development from Motion Picture and Television Production Incentives," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 52(1), August.
    6. McKean, John R. & Spencer, William P., 2003. "Implan Understates Agricultural Input-Output Multipliers: An Application To Potential Agricultural/Green Industry Drought Impacts In Colorado," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 21(2), pages 1-16.
    7. S Lieu & G I Treyz, 1992. "Estimating the Economic and Demographic Effects of an Air Quality Management Plan: The Case of Southern California," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(12), pages 1799-1811, December.
    8. Maki, Wilbur R. & Lichty, Richard W. & Loveridge, Scott, 1994. "Reducing System Bias And Specification Error In Micro-Implan," Staff Papers 13317, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Paul B. Siegel & Jeffrey Alwang & Thomas G. Johnson, 1995. "Decomposing Sources of Regional Growth with an Input-output Model: A Framework for Policy Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 331-353, July.
    10. Ebeling, W. & Förster, A. & Richert, W. & Hess, H., 1988. "Thermodynamic properties and plasma phase transition of xenon at high pressure and high temperature," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 159-171.
    11. Dan S. Rickman, 2001. "Using Input-Output Information for Bayesian Forecasting of Industry Employment in a Regional Econometric Model," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(2), pages 226-244, April.
    12. Dudensing, Rebekka & Guerrero, Bridget & Amosson, Steve, 2019. "Evaluating the Accuracy of Regional Economic Impact Estimates: Considering a 2013 Beef Plant Closure in Texas," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 49(1), May.
    13. Maki, Wilbur R., 1997. "Accounting for Local Economic Change in Regional Input-Output Modeling," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-15.
    14. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    15. Lawrence, Michael F. & Wei, Dan & Rose, Adam & Williamson, Scott & Cartwright-Smith, Devon, 2017. "Macroeconomic impacts of proposed climate change mitigation strategies for transportation in Southern California," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 56-69.
    16. C-H C Bae, 1997. "The Equity Impacts of Los Angeles' Air Quality Policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(9), pages 1563-1584, September.
    17. Kelly Robinson, 1997. "The regional economic impacts of voluntary pollution prevention in New Jersey," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 133-145, July.
    18. Adam Rose & Dan Wei & Noah Dormady, 2011. "Regional macroeconomic assessment of the Pennsylvania Climate Action Plan," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 357-379, November.
    19. Martin, Michael V. & Radtke, Hans & Eleveld, Bart & Nofziger, S. Dianne, 1988. "The Impacts Of The Conservation Reserve Program On Rural Communities: The Case Of Three Oregon Counties," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:1:p:143-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.