IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market And Welfare Effects Of Livestock Feed Subsidies In Southeastern New Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Skaggs, Rhonda K.
  • Falk, Constance L.

Abstract

Input subsidies have the potential to increase production, promote more input use, and impact the environment. Unlike many other federal agricultural subsidies, livestock feed programs have not been the subject of previous economic research. During 1992-96, the U.S. Department of Agriculture paid livestock producers an annual average of $73.2 million in feed subsidies. The objective of this research is to estimate the market and welfare effects of feed subsidies in one region of New Mexico. The price and output effects of the subsidy are found to be small, and the welfare impacts of the subsidy unevenly distributed between subsidized and nonsubsidized producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Falk, Constance L., 1998. "Market And Welfare Effects Of Livestock Feed Subsidies In Southeastern New Mexico," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31199
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31199/files/23020545.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur H. Smith & William E. Martin, 1972. "Socioeconomic Behavior of Cattle Ranchers, with Implications for Rural Community Development in the West," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 217-225.
    2. Erik Lichtenberg & Douglas D. Parker & David Zilberman, 1988. "Marginal Analysis of Welfare Costs of Environmental Policies: The Case of Pesticide Regulation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 867-874.
    3. Eric D. Ebel & Robert H. Hornbaker & Carl H. Nelson, 1992. "Welfare Effects of the National Pseudorabies Eradication Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(3), pages 638-645.
    4. William E. Foster & Linda S. Calvin & Grace M. Johns & Patricia Rottschaefer, 1986. "Distributional Welfare Implications of an Irrigation Water Subsidy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(4), pages 778-786.
    5. Rajan K. Sampath, 1983. "Returns to Public Irrigation Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 337-339.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Identifying the Real Winners from U.S. Agricultural Policies," GDAE Working Papers 05-07, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Elanor Starmer & Aimee Witteman & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Feeding the Factory Farm: Implicit Subsidies to the Broiler Chicken Industry," GDAE Working Papers 06-03, GDAE, Tufts University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skaggs, Rhonda K. & Falk, Constance L., 1997. "Market and Welfare Effects of Livestock Feed Subsidies," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35944, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Alyson S Barratt & Matthieu H Arnoult & Bouda Vosough Ahmadi & Karl M Rich & George J Gunn & Alistair W Stott, 2018. "A framework for estimating society's economic welfare following the introduction of an animal disease: The case of Johne's disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    4. Wasantha Athukorala & Clevo Wilson, 2017. "Distributional impacts of irrigation-induced agricultural development in a semi-subsistence economy: new evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(1), pages 59-75, January.
    5. Lichtenberg, Erik & Zilberman, David & Archibald, Sandra O., 1990. "Economics and Pesticides," Working Papers 197750, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Perry, C. J., 2007. "Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges?," IWMI Books, Reports H040602, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Tanaka, John A. & Torell, L. Allen & Rimbey, Neil R., 2005. "Who Are Public Land Ranchers and Why Are They Out There?," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-7.
    9. Hall, David C. & Kaiser, Harry M. & Blake, Robert W., 1998. "Modelling the economics of animal health control programs using dynamic programming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 125-144, January.
    10. Badulescu, Dan & Baylis, Katherine R., 2006. "Pesticide Regulation Under NAFTA: Harmonization in Process?," Commissioned Papers 24163, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    11. Budy P. Resosudarmo, 2001. "Impact of the Integrated Pest Management Program on the Indonesian Economy," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0102, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    12. Cox, Craig A. & Easter, K. William, 1990. "A Regional Ban Of Alachlor And Atrazine In Southeastern Minnesota: The Economic And Environmental Effects," Staff Papers 13945, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Ziemer, Rod F. & White, Fred C., 1981. "A Tobit Model Of The Demand For Farmland," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-5, December.
    14. Sexton, Steven E. & Rajagopal, Deepak & Hochman, Gal & Roland-Holst, David W. & Zilberman, David, 2008. "Biofuel: distributional and other implications of current and the next generation technologies," Risk, Infrastructure and Industry Evolution Conference, June 24-25, 2008, Berkeley, California 48721, Farm Foundation.
    15. de Fraiture, Charlotte & Perry, C. J., 2007. "Why is agricultural water demand unresponsive at low price ranges?," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    16. C. Rendleman & Kenneth Reinert & James Tobey, 1995. "Market-based systems for reducing chemical use in agriculture in the United States," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(1), pages 51-70, January.
    17. Jose L. Oviedo & Lynn Huntsinger & Pablo Campos & Alejandro Caparrós, 2011. "Assessing the income value of private amenities in California oak woodlands," Working Papers 1110, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    18. Azzeddine Azzam & Gibson Nene & Karina Schoengold, 2015. "Hog Industry Structure and the Stringency of Environmental Regulation," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(3), pages 333-358, September.
    19. Young, Katherine D. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1991. "Cow-Calf Producers' Perceived Profit Maximization Objective: A Logit Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 129-136, July.
    20. Ockwell, Anthony P. & Batterham, Robert L., 1982. "The Influence of Credit on Farm Growth," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.