IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inijae/343442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dietary Diversity: Determinants and Its Relationship with Nutritional Outcomes in Uttar Pradesh

Author

Listed:
  • Sangeetha, V.
  • Venkatesh, P.
  • Singh, Premlata
  • Satyapriya
  • Lenin, V.
  • Paul, Sudipta
  • Mahra, G.S.
  • Muralikrishnan
  • Barua, Sukanya
  • Sitaram
  • Singh, Tushar
  • Dubey, Sarvesh K.
  • Yadav, Monika

Abstract

Household consumption behaviour differs in many ways from each other. In this paper, we analyse the dietary diversity among households in Uttar Pradesh and try to understand whether the differences in the degree of variety in food consumption can be attributed to various characteristics of the household. Moreover, as diverse and healthy diets are recognised as an ultimate solution to malnutrition, we also examine the empirical connection between dietary diversity and nutritional outcomes. The study utilises household level food consumption data from the NSS 68th Round Survey and key nutritional indicators from the 4th National Family Health Survey. The Simpson index of dietary diversity shows that majority two-third of the households belonged to the medium category, followed by low diversity and high dietary diversity was found to be less than 5 per cent of the households. However, the households living in urban and western Uttar Pradesh were having a relatively higher degree of dietary diversity than rural and eastern Uttar Pradesh, respectively. The determinant analysis suggests that households’ income, education level and type of occupation of head of the households, had a significant and positive influence on dietary diversity in both the rural and urban areas, however family size had a negative influence. In addition, land size and age of the head of the households were also important factors, but only for rural households. On an average, 1000 rupees increase in household’s income would lead to 0.03 increase in the dietary diversity score of rural households, while 0.01 in case of urban households. The farming households’ dietary diversity was significantly higher than labour households in the rural areas. Similarly, selfemployed households had better dietary diversity than labour households in the urban areas. Malnutrition indicators clearly indicated that Bahraich and Shrawasti were the worst affected districts in Uttar Pradesh, while Gautam Buddha Nagar and Ghaziabad reported lowest incidence of malnutrition. Further, the multivariate regression analysis at the district level highlights that dietary diversity plays a significant role in improving the nutritional outcomes. It was found that a 10 per cent increase in the Simpson index would reduce the incidence of underweight by 1.4 per cent in case of adults and about 2 per cent in children. The study suggests that promotion of diversified food among the households is the most important for the reduction of incidence of malnutrition problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangeetha, V. & Venkatesh, P. & Singh, Premlata & Satyapriya & Lenin, V. & Paul, Sudipta & Mahra, G.S. & Muralikrishnan & Barua, Sukanya & Sitaram & Singh, Tushar & Dubey, Sarvesh K. & Yadav, Monika, 2019. "Dietary Diversity: Determinants and Its Relationship with Nutritional Outcomes in Uttar Pradesh," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 74(03), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:343442
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343442/files/Dietary%20Diversity.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 1989. "Consumer Demand for Food Diversity," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 47-53, December.
    2. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 1989. "Consumer Demand For Food Diversity," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Jonq-Ying Lee, 1987. "The Demand for Varied Diet with Econometric Models for Count Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(3), pages 687-692.
    4. Vellaichamy, S. & Singh, P. & Priya, S. & Mahra, G. & Palanisamy, V. & Venu, L. & Singh, A., 2018. "Nutritional Status and Food Consumption Pattern in India: A Study in Disadvantaged Areas of Madhya Pradesh," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277508, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. David M. Cutler & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2006. "Education and Health: Evaluating Theories and Evidence," NBER Working Papers 12352, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Christopher F Baum, 2008. "Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(2), pages 299-303, June.
    7. Cleland, John G. & van Ginneken, Jerome K., 1988. "Maternal education and child survival in developing countries: The search for pathways of influence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 1357-1368, January.
    8. Thiele, S. & Weiss, C., 2003. "Consumer demand for food diversity: evidence for Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 99-115, April.
    9. Wanki Moon & Wojciech Florkowski & Larry Beuchat & Anna Resurreccion & Pavlina Paraskova & Jordan Jordanov & Manjeet Chinnan, 2002. "Demand for food variety in an emerging market economy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 573-581.
    10. Jackson, Laurence Fraser, 1984. "Hierarchic Demand and the Engel Curve for Variety," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(1), pages 8-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tankari, Mahamadou Roufahi & Badiane, Ousmane, 2015. "Determinants of households' food diversity demand in Uganda," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 230230, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Leschewski, Andrea & Weatherspoon, Dave, 2016. "Rethinking Demand for A Varied Diet: The Role of Convenience Foods in Diversity Indices," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235572, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Pavel Ciaian & Andrej Cupák & Ján Pokrivčák & Marian Rizov, 2018. "Food consumption and diet quality choices of Roma in Romania: a counterfactual analysis," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 437-456, April.
    4. Drescher, Larissa S. & Goddard, Ellen W., 2008. "Observing Changes In Canadian Demand For Food Diversity Over Time," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6357, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Andrej Cupák & Ján Pokrivčák & Marian Rizov, 2016. "Diverzifikácia spotreby potravín na Slovensku [Diversity of Food Consumption in Slovakia]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2016(5), pages 608-626.
    6. Rizoc, Marian & Cupak, Andrej & Pokrivcak, Jan, 2015. "Food Security and household consumption patterns in Slovakia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211553, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Lilian Korir & Marian Rizov & Eric Ruto, 2023. "Diet diversity, malnutrition and health: Evidence from Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 534-550, June.
    8. Thiele, S. & Weiss, C., 2003. "Consumer demand for food diversity: evidence for Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 99-115, April.
    9. Thottappilly, Anna, 2021. "Identifying the Income Effect on Nutrition for Agricultural Households: Separability of Production and Consumption," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315335, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Pokrivcak, Jan & Cupak, Andrej & Rizov, Marian, 2015. "Household food security and consumption patterns in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of Slovakia," 2015 Fourth Congress, June 11-12, 2015, Ancona, Italy 207287, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    11. Mousumi Das, 2014. "Measures, Spatial Profile and Determinants of Dietary Diversity: Evidence from India," Working Papers id:6273, eSocialSciences.
    12. Mark D. Jekanowski & James K. Binkley, 2000. "Food purchase diversity across U.S. markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 417-433.
    13. Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & O'Neil, Carol E., 2011. "The Cost of Dietary Variety: A Case of Fruit and Vegetables," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 42(3), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Akerele, Dare & Odeiyi, Kehinde, 2015. "Demand for Diverse Diets: Evidence from Nigeria," 89th Annual Conference, April 13-15, 2015, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 204210, Agricultural Economics Society.
    15. Liu, Jing & Shively, Gerald & Binkley, James K., 2013. "Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149624, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. repec:lic:licosd:36015 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Liu, Jing & Shively, Gerald E. & Binkley, James K., 2014. "Access to variety contributes to dietary diversity in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 323-331.
    18. Drescher, Larissa S. & Goddard, Ellen W., 2011. "Heterogeneous Demand for Food Diversity: A Quantile Regression Analysis," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114484, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    19. Krivonos, Ekaterina & Kuhn, Lena, 2019. "Trade and dietary diversity in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Christian Hepenstrick & Alexander Tarasov, 2015. "Per capita income and the extensive margin of bilateral trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 1561-1599, November.
    21. Drescher, Larissa & Thiele, Silke & Weiss, Christoph R., 2008. "The taste for variety: A hedonic analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 66-68, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:343442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.