IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijag24/344703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Assessment of the Sustainability of Conservation Farming in Promoting Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Change Ward

Author

Listed:
  • Mathe, Prince

Abstract

The study assessed the sustainability of conservation farming in promoting food security among smallholder farmers in Change Ward. The study findings were analyzed using a sustainable livelihood theoretical framework using a qualitative research approach where interviews, focus group discussions, and observations were used. It was found that the farmers are growing a variety of crops, which is resulting in improved crop diversification and more resilience among farmers. This has a positive bearing on increasing food availability, the variety of crops is leading to improved nutritional status at the household level. Also, their resilience to climate change has thus far improved because of conservation agriculture which in turn increases the probability of its sustainability among farmers as they are seeing its benefits. Furthermore, vulnerabilities of this strategy were also highlighted which might pose a threat towards its sustainability, these include dependence on government inputs, too laborious, climate change which is resulting in high and unpredictable rains which come for a short period. The study found out that farmers own land for their agricultural purposes, and have family support which tends to reduce workload at the fields, farmer groups and technical support from the Agritex officers. However, during the research, some participants had a divergent view on the sustainability of this strategy as they do have assets such as land, they are not in any farmers group which has a bearing on the workload. Thus, the study shows that conservation agriculture is one of the key strategies that is being practiced by smallholder farmers towards the improvement of their food security at home. This strategy is sustainable among farmers as there are assets that are put in place that could help the farmers to continue with the strategy in ensuring food security. However, in ensuring its sustainability there were some loopholes which needs to be addressed inorder to address the sustainability aspect of this strategy such as clear and improved land ownership, women empowerment which will go a long way in addressing the shortage of financial resources. Government should introduce and subsidise the mechanization of this strategy as a way of reducing its workload in the fields. There is need for the empowerment of smallholder farmers on soft skills such as unity and respect among the farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathe, Prince, 2023. "An Assessment of the Sustainability of Conservation Farming in Promoting Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Change Ward," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 3(02), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344703
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344703/files/Prince%20Mathe.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathe, Prince, 2023. "An Assessment of the Sustainability of Conservation Farming in Promoting Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Change Ward," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 3(02), November.
    2. Roberts, Cameron & Greene, Jenna & Nemet, Gregory F., 2023. "Key enablers for carbon dioxide removal through the application of biochar to agricultural soils: Evidence from three historical analogues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Adam M. Komarek, 2018. "Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1251-1262, October.
    4. Arthur Schram & Jordi Brandts & Klarita Gërxhani, 2019. "Social-status ranking: a hidden channel to gender inequality under competition," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(2), pages 396-418, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mathe, Prince, 2023. "An Assessment of the Sustainability of Conservation Farming in Promoting Food Security Among Smallholder Farmers in Change Ward," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 3(02), November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindner, Florian & Kirchler, Michael & Rosenkranz, Stephanie & Weitzel, Utz, 2021. "Social Motives and Risk-Taking in Investment Decisions," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Jana Cahlíková & Lubomír Cingl & Ian Levely, 2020. "How Stress Affects Performance and Competitiveness Across Gender," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3295-3310, August.
    3. Kessel, Dany & Mollerstrom, Johanna & van Veldhuizen, Roel, 2021. "Can simple advice eliminate the gender gap in willingness to compete?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 138, pages 1-1.
    4. Botond Kálmán & Arnold Tóth & Tímea Juhász, 2020. "Gender Differences Of Competitive Attitude From Childhood To Adulthood," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 216-236.
    5. Lovász, Anna & Bat-Erdene, Boldmaa & Cukrowska-Torzewska, Ewa & Rigó, Mariann & Szabó-Morvai, Ágnes, 2023. "Competition, subjective feedback, and gender gaps in performance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Brandts, Jordi & El Baroudi, Sabrine & Huber, Stefanie J. & Rott, Christina, 2021. "Gender differences in private and public goal setting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 222-247.
    7. Xufang Zhang & Minghua Zhao & Xiaojie Wang & Rongqing Han, 2022. "Regional Differences of Farmers’ Willingness to Grow Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Shandong Province under the Background of New-Type Urbanization," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Klarita Gërxhani & Jordi Brandts & Arthur Schram, 2021. "Competition and Gender Inequality: A Comprehensive Analysis of Effects and Mechanisms," Working Papers 1292, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Pengkun Zheng & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2024. "Does Rural Labor Transfer Impact Chinese Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency? A Substitution Perspective of Agricultural Machinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Brandts, Jordi & Gërxhani, Klarita & Schram, Arthur, 2020. "Are there gender differences in status-ranking aversion?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Necker, Sarah & Paetzel, Fabian, 2023. "The effect of losing and winning on cheating and effort in repeated competitions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Balezentis, Tomas & Morkunas, Mangirdas & Volkov, Artiom & Ribasauskiene, Erika & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2021. "Are women neglected in the EU agriculture? Evidence from Lithuanian young farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Brütt, Katharina & Schram, Arthur & Sonnemans, Joep, 2020. "Endogenous group formation and responsibility diffusion: An experimental study," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-31.
    14. Katharina Brütt & Huaiping Yuan, 2022. "Pitfalls of pay transparency: Evidence from the lab and the field," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-055/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    15. Maurice Osewe & Chris Miyinzi Mwungu & Aijun Liu, 2020. "Does Minimum Tillage Improve Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare? Evidence from Southern Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Jin Zheng & Arthur Schram & Gönül Doğan, 2021. "Friend or foe? Social ties in bribery and corruption," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 854-882, September.
    17. Erkut, Hande & Shalvi, Shaul, 2019. "Working until you drop: Image concerns or prosocial motives?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2019-214, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Alice Guerra & Tatyana Zhuravleva, 2022. "Do women always behave as corruption cleaners?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 173-192, April.
    19. Schram, Arthur & Zheng, Jin Di & Zhuravleva, Tatyana, 2022. "Corruption: A cross-country comparison of contagion and conformism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 497-518.
    20. Florian Englmaier & Stefan Grimm & Dominik Grothe & David Schindler & Simeon Schudy, 2021. "The Efficacy of Tournaments for Non-Routine Team Tasks," CESifo Working Paper Series 9189, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.