IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/232916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Confidence Issues Connected To Flood Disaster Reconstruction

Author

Listed:
  • Kiss, Alida

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate major national and international level recent researches about public confidence, institutional trust focus on disaster management systems. The broader research purposes analysing the national, regional status of public confidence, attitude linked to many institutions and organisations which participate in post-flood-disaster reconstruction using the relevant elements of previous studies contributing to higher efficiency of post-flood-disaster reconstruction processes. In our country this field is a slightly studied area (during my former research there could not been found any study about public trust in case of post-flood-disaster reconstruction) thus considered important to made a review study. During collecting literature it turned out that public confidence issue is a very complex area. Many methodologies exist for its investigations and determinations despite, there are no integrated approaches. From the results of this study it is obvious, that all of the investigated researches approached the public trust topic in different context. Nonetheless, the analyzed methodologies could be appropriate basis of a subsequent questionnaire survey of public trust of the Hungarian post-flood-disaster reconstruction organisations. ------------------------------------------------- A cikk elkészítésével célom volt, hogy feltárjam, milyen főbb kutatásokat végeztek a közelmúltban nemzetközi és hazai kutatók, kutató szervezetek társadalmi, intézményi bizalom témakörében, fókuszálva a katasztrófavédelmi rendszert érintő vizsgálatára. A tágabb kutatás célja, hogy alapul véve a már kivitelezett, kidolgozott társadalmi bizalmi kutatások releváns elemeit, vizsgálja a hazai társadalmi bizalom alakulását az árvízi katasztrófákat követő kárenyhítésben részt vevő szervek, intézmények iránt, hozzájárulva ezzel a kárenyhítési folyamatelemek hatékonyságának növeléséhez. Mivel a kérdéskör hazánkban kevéssé kutatott terület (vagyis eddigi kutatásim során nem találkoztam a társadalmi bizalmat az árvízi kárenyhítéssel kapcsolatban vizsgáló tanulmánnyal), ezért tartottam fontosnak egy összegző tanulmány elkészítését. A téma feldolgozása során fény derült arra, hogy társadalmi, intézményi bizalom kérdésköre egy rendkívül komplex terület. Számos módszertan létezik a vizsgálatára, valamint definiálására, mégsem beszélhetünk egységes megközelítésekről. A tanulmány eredményeiből látható, hogy a vizsgált kutatások szinte mindegyike más-más kontextusban közelíti meg a témát. Ennek ellenére az általuk használt módszertanok jó alapját képezhetik az árvízi katasztrófákat követő kárenyhítésben részt vevő szervek, intézmények iránt tanúsított bizalom kérdőíves felmérésnek.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiss, Alida, 2016. "Public Confidence Issues Connected To Flood Disaster Reconstruction," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:232916
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232916/files/2_Kiss%20Alida.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schweitzer, Maurice E. & Hershey, John C. & Bradlow, Eric T., 2006. "Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dirks, Kurt T. & Kim, Peter H. & Ferrin, Donald L. & Cooper, Cecily D., 2011. "Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 87-103, March.
    2. Raju, Sekar & Rajagopal, Priyali & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "The moderating effects of prior trust on consumer responses to firm failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-37.
    3. Dijke, Marius van & Cremer, David De, 2011. "When social accounts promote acceptance of unfair ultimatum offers: The role of the victim's stress responses to uncertainty and power position," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 468-479, June.
    4. Eric Schniter & Roman M. Sheremeta & Daniel Sznycer, 2011. "Restoring Damaged Trust with Promises, Atonement and Apology," Working Papers 11-18, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    5. Mislin, Alexandra A. & Campagna, Rachel L. & Bottom, William P., 2011. "After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 55-68, May.
    6. Eric Schniter & Roman M. Sheremeta, 2014. "Predictable and Predictive Emotions: Explaining Cheap Signals and Trust Re-Extension," Working Papers 14-07, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    7. Nohe, Christoph & Hüffmeier, Joachim & Bürkner, Paul & Mazei, Jens & Sondern, Dominik & Runte, Antonia & Sieber, Franziska & Hertel, Guido, 2022. "Unethical choice in negotiations: A meta-analysis on gender differences and their moderators," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    8. Yumei HOU & Maryam Khokhar & Mumtaz Khan & Tahir Islam & Imtiaz Haider, 2021. "Put Safety First: Exploring the Role of Health and Safety Practices in Improving the Performance of SMEs," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    9. Moore, Alexander K. & Lewis, Joshua & Levine, Emma E. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2023. "Benevolent friends and high integrity leaders: How preferences for benevolence and integrity change across relationships," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. SimanTov-Nachlieli, Ilanit & Har-Vardi, Liron & Moran, Simone, 2020. "When negotiators with honest reputations are less (and more) likely to be deceived," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 68-84.
    11. Kähkönen, T. & Blomqvist, K. & Gillespie, N. & Vanhala, M., 2021. "Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 98-109.
    12. repec:lic:licosd:30912 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Lei, Vivian & Masclet, David & Vesely, Filip, 2014. "Competition vs. communication: An experimental study on restoring trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 94-107.
    14. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Ping Wu & Yifan Xu, 2014. "An Empirical Study of the Toxic Capsule Crisis in China: Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Responses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 698-710, April.
    15. Benjamin Ho, 2012. "Apologies as Signals: With Evidence from a Trust Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 141-158, January.
    16. Ali Shamsollahi & Danielle A. Chmielewski-Raimondo & Simon J. Bell & Reza Kachouie, 2021. "Buyer–supplier relationship dynamics: a systematic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 418-436, March.
    17. Michael P. Haselhuhn & Maurice E. Schweitzer & Laura J. Kray & Jessica A. Kennedy, 2017. "Perceptions of High Integrity Can Persist After Deception: How Implicit Beliefs Moderate Trust Erosion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 215-225, September.
    18. Walkowitz, Gari & Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik & Irlenbusch, Bernd, 2013. "Moral hypocrisy: Self-deception or impression management?," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79701, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Lacomba, Juan A. & Lagos, Francisco & Reuben, Ernesto & van Winden, Frans, 2014. "On the escalation and de-escalation of conflict," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 40-57.
    20. Fischbacher, Urs & Utikal, Verena, 2013. "On the acceptance of apologies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 592-608.
    21. Muhammad Khan & Marwan Khan & Abbas Ali & Muhammad Imran Khan & Ihsan Ullah & Muhammad Iqbal, 2022. "Digitalization for Fast, Fair, and Safe Humanitarian Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics; Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:232916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrghu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.