IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/260128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft in der Gesellschaft: Eine Kausalanalyse

Author

Listed:
  • Albersmeier, F.
  • Spiller, A.

Abstract

Die Fleischwirtschaft steht zunehmend im Fokus der öffentlichen Diskussion. Die Unternehmen der Branche verhalten sich dabei eher passiv. Die Distanz zwischen Gesellschaft und der Fleischwirtschaft ist in den vergangenen Jahren daher größer geworden. Anzeichen für die mangelnde Akzeptanz sind z. B. Initiativen gegen Bauvorhaben, ein geringes Vertrauen und ein steigender Vegetarieranteil. Um Rückschlüsse auf das gesamte Ausmaß dieser Problematik zu gewinnen, wird in der vorliegenden Arbeit die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft umfassend untersucht. Unter Verwendung der Partial Least Squares Methode (PLS) werden Einfluss- und Erklärungsgrößen analysiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass das Interesse und Wissen über die Branche insgesamt eher gering sind. Hierin begründet sich möglicherweise der hohe Einfluss der affektiven Dimensionen Zuverlässigkeit und Emotional Appeal,während die Erwartungen an die Erfüllung spezifischer Leistungskomponenten (wie z. B. Tierschutz) von untergeordneter Relevanz sind. Die Analysen verdeutlichen ferner die große Bedeutung der Reputation zur Erklärung verschiedener Akzeptanzprobleme der Branche.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Albersmeier, F. & Spiller, A., 2010. "Die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft in der Gesellschaft: Eine Kausalanalyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 45, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:260128
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260128/files/Bd45Nr14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manfred Schwaiger, 2004. "Components And Parameters Of Corporate Reputation – An Empirical Study," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 56(1), pages 46-71, January.
    2. Schulze, Holger & Bohm, Justus & Kleinschmit, Daniela & Spiller, Achim & Nowak, Beate, 2008. "Öffentliche Wahrnehmung der Primärverantwortung für Lebensmittelsicherheit: Eine Medienanalyse der Gammelfleischskandale," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 57(07), pages 1-12.
    3. Dierks, Leef H., 2007. "Does trust influence consumer behaviour?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 56(02), pages 1-6.
    4. Franz, Reiner & Enneking, U., 2005. "Bestimmungsgründe der Verbraucherverunsicherung im Bereich der Lebensmittelsicherheit," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40, March.
    5. Becker, H. & Oppermann, R., 1994. "Der Ärger mit der Landwirtschaft. Umweltkritik und Ablehnung landwirtschaftlicher Produktion als Alltagserfahrung der heutigen Landwirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arens, Ludwig & Plumeyer, Cord-Herwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2011. "Akzeptanz von Informationssystemen durch Schweinemäster: Eine Kausalanalyse," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114482, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260780, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    3. Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette Leila & Hartmann, Monika & Weingarten, Nina, 2022. "Sustainability Trade-Offs in Animal Husbandry – Consumers' Meat Choice if They Can’t Have it All," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322109, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Brümmer, Bernhard & Spiller, Achim & Mehlhose, Clara & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2018. "Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2017," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(Supplemen), April.
    5. Mergenthaler, Marcus & Schröter, Iris, 2020. "Institutionelle Grenzen und Perspektiven bei der ökonomischen Bewertung und der Bereitstellung von Tierwohl," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305598, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    6. Isaak, Marike & Brenneke, Iris & Lentz, Wolfgang, 2020. "Conception and evaluation of a structural equation model to measure the reputation of German horticulture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(2), March.
    7. Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Climate-Adapted Soil Cultivation as an Aspect for Sustainable Farming – Task-Technology-Fit of a Decision Support System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, July.
    8. Arens, L. & Plumeyer, C.H. & Theuvsen, L., 2012. "Akzeptanz von Informationssystemen durch Schweinemäster: Eine Kausalanalyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    9. Busch, Gesa & Spiller, Achim, 2020. "Warum wir eine Tierschutzsteuer brauchen: Die Bürger-Konsumenten-Lücke," DARE Discussion Papers 2001, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    10. Simons, J. & Hartmann, M. & Klink-Lehmann, J. & Vierboom, C. & Harlen, I., 2018. "Acceptance of animal husbandry in Germany: Drivers and different ways to cope with problems," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277367, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Kayser, Maike & Nitzko, Sina & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Analysis of Differences in Meat Consumption Patterns," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Busch, Gesa & Bayer, Elsia & Iweala, Sarah & Mehlhose, Clara & Rubach, Constanze & Schütz, Aurelia & Ullmann, Konstanze & Spiller, Achim, 2020. "Einkaufs- und Ernährungsverhalten sowie Resilienz des Ernährungssystems aus Sicht der Bevölkerung: Eine Studie während der Corona-Pandemie im Juni 2020. Ergebnisse der zweiten Befragungswelle," DARE Discussion Papers 2004, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Emmann, Carsten H. & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Individual acceptance of the biogas innovation: A structural equation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-378.
    14. Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Climate-Adapted Soil Cultivation as an Aspect for Sustainable Farming –," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164769, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    15. Mergenthaler, Marcus & Schröter, Iris, 2020. "Institutionelle Grenzen und Perspektiven bei der ökonomischen Bewertung und der Bereitstellung von Tierwohl," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305598, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albersmeier, Friederike & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "Supply Chain Reputation in der Fleischwirtschaft," DARE Discussion Papers 0811, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Peter Chemwile & Gregory Namusonge & Mike Iravo, 2016. "Relationship between Strategic Environmental Relations Practice and Organizational Performance of Companies Listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(10), pages 339-355, October.
    3. Danks, Nicholas P. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2020. "Model selection uncertainty and multimodel inference in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 13-24.
    4. Lu, Jintao & Jia, Xiaorong & Lev, Benjamin & Zhang, Chong & Gao, Yangyang & Zhao, Min & He, Yifan, 2021. "How to understand “salable fake goods” and “unsalable quality goods”? An insight from the view of quality responsibility and consumers’ brand loyalty," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Huaming Wang & Xing Huang & Bo Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Public Opinion Pressure on Green Innovation in Construction Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Green Corporate Image and the Regulatory Effect of Market Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. David Berlepsch & Fred Lemke & Matthew Gorton, 2024. "The Importance of Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review, Bibliometric Mapping, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 9-34, January.
    7. Sarstedt, Marko & Wilczynski, Petra & Melewar, T.C., 2013. "Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 329-339.
    8. Benjamin Pfister & Manfred Schwaiger & Tobias Morath, 2020. "Corporate reputation and the future cost of equity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 343-384, April.
    9. Sascha Raithel & Manfred Schwaiger, 2015. "The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 945-956, June.
    10. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    11. Kirkwood, Jodyanne & Gray, Brendan, 2009. "From entrepreneur to mayor: Assessing the impact of the founder’s changing reputation on Hubbard Foods Ltd," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 115-124.
    12. Kick, Markus & Littich, Martina, 2015. "Brand and Reputation as Quality Signals on Regulated Markets," EconStor Preprints 182503, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Nadine Gatzert & Joan T. Schmit & Andreas Kolb, 2016. "Assessing the Risks of Insuring Reputation Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(3), pages 641-679, September.
    14. S. M. Shafiul Alam & K. M. Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Sharifah Faridah Syed Alwi & T. C. Melewar & Maria Teresa Cuomo & Manfred Schwaiger, 2020. "Digital Society and Corporate Reputation: Towards the Next Generation of Insights," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 129-132, August.
    16. Vicente Lima Crisóstomo & Priscila Azevedo Prudêncio & Isac Freitas Brandão, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Brazil: The Effects of the Shareholding Control Configuration, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 243-263, November.
    17. Vig Silvija & Dumičić Ksenija & Klopotan Igor, 2017. "The Impact of Reputation on Corporate Financial Performance: Median Regression Approach," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 40-58, September.
    18. Kick, Markus, 2015. "The Price Premium Induced by Branding: A Health Care Case Study," EconStor Preprints 182504, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Becker, Jan-Michael & Ringle, Christian M., 2019. "How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 197-211.
    20. José Luis Galdón Salvador & Gabriel Marín Díaz, 2024. "Enhancing Business Decision Making through a New Corporate Reputation Measurement Model: Practical Application in a Supplier Selection Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:260128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.