IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v62y2013icp372-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual acceptance of the biogas innovation: A structural equation model

Author

Listed:
  • Emmann, Carsten H.
  • Arens, Ludwig
  • Theuvsen, Ludwig

Abstract

The rapid spread of biogas production in Germany has resulted in an increased public debate over this new business branch. Today the production of biogas is much more controversially debated than several years ago. At the same time it could be proven that even among farmers themselves the acceptance of biogas production in some regions is somewhat dampened due to accompanying “collateral damages”. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to identify relevant influencing factors that determine the acceptance of the innovation “biogas” among farmers by applying a causal analysis. Initial results among the five investigated determinants show that not only an individual attitude toward biogas but also the farmers' personal innovativeness strongly and significantly influences an individual's acceptance of the innovation “biogas”.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmann, Carsten H. & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Individual acceptance of the biogas innovation: A structural equation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:62:y:2013:i:c:p:372-378
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151300726X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Jay Pil & Thum, Marcel, 1998. "Market structure and the timing of technology adoption with network externalities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 225-244, February.
    2. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    3. Wustenhagen, Rolf & Wolsink, Maarten & Burer, Mary Jean, 2007. "Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2683-2691, May.
    4. Sven Bode & Manuel Frondel & Christoph Schmidt & Fritz Vahrenholt & Sebastian Schröer, 2010. "Integration der erneuerbaren Energien in das Stromversorgungssystem," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 90(10), pages 643-660, October.
    5. Albersmeier, Friederike & Spiller, Achim, 2010. "Die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft: eine Kausalanalyse," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 59(4).
    6. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    7. Albersmeier, Friederike & Spiller, Achim, 2010. "Die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft: eine Kausalanalyse," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(04), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Albersmeier, F. & Spiller, A., 2010. "Die Reputation der Fleischwirtschaft in der Gesellschaft: Eine Kausalanalyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 45, March.
    9. Voss, J. & Schaper, C. & Spiller, A. & Theuvsen, L., 2009. "Innovationsverhalten in der deutschen Landwirtschaft – Empirische Ergebnisse am Beispiel der Biogasproduktion," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    10. Bahrs, Enno & Held, Jobst-Henrik & Thiering, Jochen, 2007. "Auswirkungen der Bioenergieproduktion auf die Agrarpolitik sowie auf Anreizstrukturen in der Landwirtschaft: eine partielle Analyse bedeutender Fragestellungen anhand der Beispielregion Niedersachsen," DARE Discussion Papers 0705, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    11. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen: erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," DARE Discussion Papers 0911, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    12. Frambach, Ruud T. & Schillewaert, Niels, 2002. "Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-176, February.
    13. Heyder, Matthias & Theuvsen, Ludwig & Hollmann-Hespos, Thorsten, 2012. "Investments in tracking and tracing systems in the food industry: A PLS analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 102-113.
    14. Deimel, Mark & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2010. "Standortvorteil Nordwestdeutschland? Eine Untersuchung zum Einfluss von Netzwerk- und Clusterstrukturen in der Schweinefleischerzeugung," DARE Discussion Papers 1004, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    15. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187307, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    16. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 187307, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuray Cakirli Akyüz & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2020. "The Impact of Behavioral Drivers on Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices: The Case of Organic Farming in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Sören Mohrmann & Verena Otter, 2022. "Categorisation of Biogas Plant Operators in Germany with Regards to Their Intention to Use Straw Pellets as Innovative and Sustainable Substrate Alternative," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Riffat Ara Zannat Tama & Md Mahmudul Hoque & Ying Liu & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mark Yu, 2023. "An Application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to Examining Farmers’ Behavioral Attitude and Intention towards Conservation Agriculture in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Chodkowska-Miszczuk Justyna & Kulla Marián & Novotný Ladislav, 2017. "The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(35), pages 19-34, March.
    5. Deborah Scharfy & Norman Boccali & Matthias Stucki, 2017. "Clean Technologies in Agriculture—How to Prioritise Measures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Busse, Maria & Siebert, Rosemarie, 2018. "Acceptance studies in the field of land use—A critical and systematic review to advance the conceptualization of acceptance and acceptability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 235-245.
    7. Huan, Ning & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Sato, Hitomi & Tzioutzios, Dimitrios & Yin, Haohui & Sala, Roser, 2024. "Does accident awareness affect people's risk perception of hydrogen infrastructure and information-seeking behaviour?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    8. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Marco Modica & Andrea Rampa, 2021. "The Biogas dilemma: an analysis on the Social Approval of large new plants," SEEDS Working Papers 0221, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Apr 2021.
    9. Stanislav Martinát & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Marián Kulla & Josef Navrátil & Petr Klusáček & Petr Dvořák & Ladislav Novotný & Tomáš Krejčí & Loránt Pregi & Jakub Trojan & Bohumil Frantál, 2022. "Best Practice Forever? Dynamics behind the Perception of Farm-Fed Anaerobic Digestion Plants in Rural Peripheries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Röder, Mirjam, 2016. "More than food or fuel. Stakeholder perceptions of anaerobic digestion and land use; a case study from the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 73-81.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Schaper & Ludwig Theuvsen & Achim Spiller, 2010. "Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern: Eine Typologisierung," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 3(1), pages 157-193.
    2. Busch, Gesa & Spiller, Achim, 2020. "Warum wir eine Tierschutzsteuer brauchen: Die Bürger-Konsumenten-Lücke," DARE Discussion Papers 2001, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    3. Lemken, D. & Stolze, K. & Wille, C.S., 2017. "Welche Faktoren beeinflussen den Roggeneinsatz in der Schweinefütterung? Eine empirische Analyse von deutschen Schweinehaltern," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 261096, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    4. Arens, L. & Plumeyer, C.H. & Theuvsen, L., 2012. "Akzeptanz von Informationssystemen durch Schweinemäster: Eine Kausalanalyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    5. Mohrmann, Sören & Steins, Aaron & Schaper, Christian, 2021. "Erfolgsfaktoren und Zukunftsaussichten für eine wirtschaftliche Biogasproduktion in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317072, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    6. Mergenthaler, Marcus & Schröter, Iris, 2020. "Institutionelle Grenzen und Perspektiven bei der ökonomischen Bewertung und der Bereitstellung von Tierwohl," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305598, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Busch, Gesa & Bayer, Elsia & Iweala, Sarah & Mehlhose, Clara & Rubach, Constanze & Schütz, Aurelia & Ullmann, Konstanze & Spiller, Achim, 2020. "Einkaufs- und Ernährungsverhalten sowie Resilienz des Ernährungssystems aus Sicht der Bevölkerung: Eine Studie während der Corona-Pandemie im Juni 2020. Ergebnisse der zweiten Befragungswelle," DARE Discussion Papers 2004, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    8. Beer, Lara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2020. "Factors influencing German farmer’s decision to grow alley cropping systems as ecological focus areas: a regression analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    9. Busse, Maria & Siebert, Rosemarie, 2018. "Acceptance studies in the field of land use—A critical and systematic review to advance the conceptualization of acceptance and acceptability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 235-245.
    10. Mergenthaler, Marcus & Schröter, Iris, 2020. "Institutionelle Grenzen und Perspektiven bei der ökonomischen Bewertung und der Bereitstellung von Tierwohl," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305598, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    11. Simons, J. & Hartmann, M. & Klink-Lehmann, J. & Vierboom, C. & Harlen, I., 2018. "Acceptance of animal husbandry in Germany: Drivers and different ways to cope with problems," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277367, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & Sonntag, Winnie, 2016. "Gibt es eine Zukunft für die moderne konventionelle Tierhaltung in Nordwesteuropa?," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 260780, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Climate-Adapted Soil Cultivation as an Aspect for Sustainable Farming – Task-Technology-Fit of a Decision Support System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Wille, Stefan Clemens & Lemken, Dominic & Stolze, Kristof, 2017. "Welche Faktoren Beeinflussen Den Roggeneinsatz In Der Schweinefütterung? Eine Empirische Analyse Von Deutschen Schweinehaltern," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 261997, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Isaak, Marike & Brenneke, Iris & Lentz, Wolfgang, 2020. "Conception and evaluation of a structural equation model to measure the reputation of German horticulture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(2), March.
    16. Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Climate-Adapted Soil Cultivation as an Aspect for Sustainable Farming –," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164769, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    17. Kayser, Maike & Nitzko, Sina & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Analysis of Differences in Meat Consumption Patterns," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Brümmer, Bernhard & Spiller, Achim & Mehlhose, Clara & Schulze-Ehlers, Birgit, 2018. "Der Markt für Milch und Milcherzeugnisse im Jahr 2017," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(Supplemen), April.
    19. Arens, Ludwig & Plumeyer, Cord-Herwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2011. "Akzeptanz von Informationssystemen durch Schweinemäster: Eine Kausalanalyse," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114482, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette Leila & Hartmann, Monika & Weingarten, Nina, 2022. "Sustainability Trade-Offs in Animal Husbandry – Consumers' Meat Choice if They Can’t Have it All," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322109, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:62:y:2013:i:c:p:372-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.