IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frraes/276816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobiliser les agriculteurs pour le climat sans en parler... Réflexions sur des apprentissages inachevés

Author

Listed:
  • THAREAU, Bertille
  • FABRY, Mathilde

Abstract

La lutte contre le changement climatique est devenue un enjeu de premier plan dans les sphères scientifiques et institutionnelles. Depuis la fin des années 2000, des organisations professionnelles ou locales testent des dispositifs de travail avec des agriculteurs en vue de les sensibiliser à cet enjeu et de faire évoluer leurs pratiques. Notre recherche porte sur l’analyse comparée de six de ces dispositifs en Pays de la Loire. Nous montrons qu’en fonction des moyens mis en oeuvre pour intéresser les agriculteurs, les groupes de travail constitués diffèrent largement, allant d’espaces de discussion entre agriculteurs convaincus par l’enjeu climatique, à des alliances entre une diversité d’agriculteurs dans le cadre de leurs réseaux de dialogue habituels. Dans tous les cas, pour inviter les agriculteurs, les porteurs des dispositifs en reformulent le sens et les objectifs. Cette reformulation opère ensuite parfois comme un rempart à l’enrôlement des agriculteurs, c’est-à-dire à un travail sur leurs connaissances de leur rapport au climat. Ainsi ces dispositifs agri-climatiques manquent leur objectif d’apprentissage.

Suggested Citation

  • THAREAU, Bertille & FABRY, Mathilde, 2015. "Mobiliser les agriculteurs pour le climat sans en parler... Réflexions sur des apprentissages inachevés," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(4), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:276816
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276816/files/01_Thareau.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Mormont, 1996. "Agriculture et environnement : pour une sociologie des dispositifs," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 236(1), pages 28-36.
    2. Pascal Germain & Roger Le Guen & Bertille Thareau, 2006. "La re-territorialisation du développement agricole : le cas de l'agriculture périurbaine d'Angers," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 373-392.
    3. Geels, Frank W. & Schot, Johan, 2007. "Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-417, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B. Thareau & N. Seyni & T. Coisnon & P. Dupraz, 2023. "Designing carbon markets connecting farmers and companies: stakeholders claiming territorial-based devices to promote synergies between diverse environmental challenges," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 167-191, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertille Thareau & Mathilde Fabry & Manon Gosset, 2016. "Mobilizing farmers against climate change in an implicit fashion.. . Reflections on incomplete learnings [Mobiliser les agriculteurs pour le climat sans en parler... Réflexions sur des apprentissag," Post-Print hal-01885204, HAL.
    2. Bertille THAREAU & Mathilde FABRY & Manon GOSSET, 2015. "Mobiliser les agriculteurs pour le climat sans en parler. . . Réflexions sur des apprentissages inachevés," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 569-598.
    3. Christina Gugerell & Marianne Penker, 2020. "Change Agents’ Perspectives on Spatial–Relational Proximities and Urban Food Niches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    5. Weking, Jörg & Desouza, Kevin C. & Fielt, Erwin & Kowalkiewicz, Marek, 2023. "Metaverse-enabled entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    6. Pacheco, Desirée F. & Khoury, Theodore A., 2023. "Social movements and entrepreneurial activity: A study of the U.S. solar energy industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    7. Anglade, J. & Billen, G. & Garnier, J. & Makridis, T. & Puech, T. & Tittel, C., 2015. "Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 82-92.
    8. Hirt, Léon F. & Sahakian, Marlyne & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2022. "What subnational imaginaries for solar PV? The case of the Swiss energy transition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Costantini, Valeria & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2012. "On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 132-153.
    10. Mariya Peneva, Mariya & Yanka Kazakova-Mateva, Yanka, 2015. "Local Food Systems and Rural Development in Bulgaria," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 15(30), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Wiegand, Julia, 2017. "Dezentrale Stromerzeugung als Chance zur Stärkung der Energie-Resilienz: Eine qualitative Analyse kommunaler Strategien im Raum Unna," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 11, number 11.
    12. Pasquale Marcello Falcone & Edgardo Sica, 2015. "How much does economic crisis affect sustainability transitions? A social network analysis of the Italian biofuel sector," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 264-270.
    13. Kuhmonen, Tuomas, 2017. "Exposing the attractors of evolving complex adaptive systems by utilising futures images: Milestones of the food sustainability journey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 214-225.
    14. Zwartkruis, Joyce V. & Berg, Holger & Hof, Andries F. & Kok, Marcel T.J., 2020. "Agricultural nature conservation in the Netherlands: Three lenses on transition pathways," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Capellán-Pérez, Iñigo & Campos-Celador, Álvaro & Terés-Zubiaga, Jon, 2018. "Renewable Energy Cooperatives as an instrument towards the energy transition in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 215-229.
    16. Funcke, Simon & Bauknecht, Dierk, 2016. "Typology of centralised and decentralised visions for electricity infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 67-74.
    17. Koirala, Binod Prasad & van Oost, Ellen & van der Windt, Henny, 2018. "Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 570-585.
    18. Bessi, Alessandro & Guidolin, Mariangela & Manfredi, Piero, 2021. "The role of gas on future perspectives of renewable energy diffusion: Bridging technology or lock-in?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Rauschmayer, Felix & Bauler, Tom & Schäpke, Niko, 2013. "Towards a governance of sustainability transitions: Giving place to individuals," UFZ Discussion Papers 17/2013, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    20. Helgegren, Ida & McConville, Jennifer & Landaeta, Graciela & Rauch, Sebastien, 2021. "A multiple regime analysis of the water and sanitation sectors in the Kanata metropolitan region, Bolivia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:276816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.