IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frraes/196592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les légumes transformés : diversité des produits, diversité des usages sociaux

Author

Listed:
  • Plessz, Marie

Abstract

During the last decades, consumption of fresh vegetables has declined while consumption of processed vegetables has increased. This paper aims at characterizing the purchases of processed vegetables in France by carrying out a principal component analysis of consumption data from the Kantar Worldpanel 2007 data. Older and more affluent households buy relatively more fresh produce and, when they buy processed vegetables, tend to choose the least processed forms. However the same product (namely minimally processed raw vegetables) are bought and used differently according to the age of the respondent. Finally, respondents less than 40 years old buy different combinations of products depending on their education, occupation and household structure while the most relevant characteristic of those over the age of 60 is income.

Suggested Citation

  • Plessz, Marie, 2013. "Les légumes transformés : diversité des produits, diversité des usages sociaux," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 94(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:196592
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.196592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/196592/files/94-%20_1__%2013-37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.196592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gwenaël Larmet, 2002. "La sociabilité alimentaire s'accroît," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 352(1), pages 191-211.
    2. Patrice Bertail & France Caillavet, 2008. "Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Patterns: A Segmentation Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 827-842.
    3. Gershuny, Jonathan, 2000. "Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198287872.
    4. Alain Chenu & Nicolas Herpin, 2002. "Une pause dans la marche vers la civilisation des loisirs ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 352(1), pages 15-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coline Ferrant & Philippe Cardon & Pierre Chauvin, 2018. "Individual and Contextual Factors on Meal Patterns among Older Adults in Paris and the Inner Suburbs," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03440872, HAL.
    2. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7po41o0s2r8a280jp65ahvu46k is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7po41o0s2r8a280jp65ahvu46k is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Coline Ferrant & Philippe Cardon & Pierre Chauvin, 2018. "Individual and Contextual Factors on Meal Patterns among Older Adults in Paris and the Inner Suburbs," Working Papers hal-03440872, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cécile Brousse, 2015. "La vie quotidienne en France depuis 1974. Les enseignements de l'enquête Emploi du temps," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 478(1), pages 79-117.
    2. Thibault de Saint Pol, 2006. "Dinner in France : An Enduring Dietary Synchronism," Working Papers 2006-13, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    3. Clara Champagne & Ariane Pailhé & Anne Solaz, 2015. "Le temps domestique et parental des hommes et des femmes : quels facteurs d'évolutions en 25 ans ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 478(1), pages 209-242.
    4. Thibaut De Saint Pol, 2005. "Le diner des Français : Etude séquentielle d'un emploi du temps," Working Papers 2005-19, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    5. Laurent Lesnard & Thibaut de Saint Pol, 2008. "Organisation du travail dans la semaine des individus et des couples actifs : le poids des déterminants économiques et sociaux," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 414(1), pages 53-74.
    6. Anne Solaz & François-Charles Wolff, 2015. "Intergenerational Correlation of Domestic Work : Does Gender Matter ?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 117-118, pages 159-184.
    7. Lamia Kandil & Hélène Perivier, 2017. "La division sexuée du travail dans les couples selon le statut marital en France - une étude à partir des enquêtes emploi du temps de 1985-1986, 1998-1999, et 2009-2010," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2017-03, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    8. Mullan, Killian, 2006. "Quantifying parental childcare in the United Kingdom," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-49, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Stella Chatzitheochari & Kimberly Fisher & Emily Gilbert & Lisa Calderwood & Tom Huskinson & Andrew Cleary & Jonathan Gershuny, 2018. "Using New Technologies for Time Diary Data Collection: Instrument Design and Data Quality Findings from a Mixed-Mode Pilot Survey," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 379-390, May.
    10. Ariane Pailhé & Anne Solaz, 2008. "Time with Children: Do Fathers and Mothers Replace Each Other When One Parent is Unemployed?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 211-236, June.
    11. Fischer, Ilan & Sullivan, Oriel, 2007. "Evolutionary modeling of time-use vectors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 120-143, January.
    12. Booth, A.L. & van Ours, J.C., 2007. "Job Satisfaction And Family Happiness : The Part-Time Work Problem," Discussion Paper 2007-69, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8651 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Capacci, Sara & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2011. "Five-a-day, a price to pay: An evaluation of the UK program impact accounting for market forces," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, January.
    15. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8642 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Alison L. Booth & Jan C. Van Ours, 2008. "Job Satisfaction and Family Happiness: The Part‐Time Work Puzzle," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(526), pages 77-99, February.
    17. Michael Burda & Daniel Hamermesh & Philippe Weil, 2013. "Total work and gender: facts and possible explanations," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 239-261, January.
    18. Hélène Garner & Dominique Méda & Claudia Sénik, 2006. "La place du travail dans les identités," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 393(1), pages 21-40.
    19. Joachim Merz, 2009. "Zeitverwendungsforschung und Mediennutzung," FFB-Discussionpaper 76, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    20. Juan Carlos Campaña & J. Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal & Jose Alberto Molina, 2017. "Increasing the Human Capital of Children in Latin American Countries: The Role of Parents’ Time in Childcare," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 805-825, June.
    21. Nicolas Herpin & Jean-Hugues Déchaux, 2004. "Entraide familiale, indépendance économique et sociabilité," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 373(1), pages 3-32.
    22. Laura Langner, 2022. "Desperate Housewives and Happy Working Mothers: Are Parent-Couples with Equal Income More Satisfied throughout Parenthood? A Dyadic Longitudinal Study," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(1), pages 80-100, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:196592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.