IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Economically Optimal Nutrition and Marketing Strategies for Paylean® Usage in Hog Production

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ning
  • Preckel, Paul V.
  • Foster, Kenneth A.
  • Schinckel, Allan P.

Abstract

An approach to the development of the economically optimal dietary concentration of Paylean, duration of the Paylean feeding, and dietary lysine concentration for finishing hog production is presented. A simulation model describing daily growth of hogs under different Paylean and lysine concentration combinations was adapted for optimizing nutrition and marketing when feed is supplemented with Paylean. Net returns per pig space per day under four alternative payment schemes are maximized based on 10-year average price levels and production costs. Profitability of Paylean is investigated, and management strategies for swine production with Paylean are developed for two representative finishing operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ning & Preckel, Paul V. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Schinckel, Allan P., 2003. "Analysis of Economically Optimal Nutrition and Marketing Strategies for Paylean® Usage in Hog Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31097
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31097/files/28020272.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brorsen, B. Wade & Akridge, Jay T. & Boland, Michael A. & Mauney, Sean & Forrest, John C., 1998. "Performance Of Alternative Component Pricing Systems For Pork," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Jean-Paul Chavas & James Kliebenstein & Thomas D. Crenshaw, 1985. "Modeling Dynamic Agricultural Production Response: The Case of Swine Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 636-646.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Esteve Nadal-Roig & Adela Pagès-Bernaus & Lluís M. Plà-Aragonès, 2018. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model Based on Profit and CO 2 Emissions for Pig Deliveries to the Abattoir," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jeffrey Ohlmann & Philip Jones, 2011. "An integer programming model for optimal pork marketing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 271-287, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Gang & Roberts, Matthew C., 2004. "A Dynamic Programming Framework For Using Weather Derivatives To Manage Dairy Profit Risk," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20171, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Parsons, Jay R. & Hoag, Dana L. & Frasier, W. Marshall & Koontz, Stephen R., 2002. "Variable Growth Impacts On Optimal Market Timing In All-Out Production Systems," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36610, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Trapp, James N., 1989. "The Dawning Of The Age Of Dynamic Theory: Its Implications For Agricultural Economics Research And Teaching," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Roka, Fritz M. & Hoag, Dana L., 1996. "Manure Value And Liveweight Swine Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Leen, Frederik & Van den Broeke, Alice & Aluwé, Marijke & Ludwig, Lauwers & Sam, Millet & Jef, Van Meensel, 2017. "Simulation Modelling To Provide Insights Into The Optimization Of Delivery Weights Of Finisher Pigs," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261272, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Roemen, J.H.J. & de Klein, J., 1998. "An optimal delivery strategy for porkers with heterogeneity and dependent prices," Other publications TiSEM 4775b203-6880-43c8-b1c7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Liu, Min & Jikun, Huang, 2018. "The Asymmetric Response of Farmers to the Expected Change of Rubber Price: the Roles of Sunk Cost and Path Dependency," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274122, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Webber, C. A. & Graham, J. D. & MacGregor, R. J., 1988. "A Regional Analysis of Direct Government Assistance Programs in Canada and their Impacts on the Beef and Hogs Sectors," Working Papers 244071, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    9. Boland, Michael A. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V., 1999. "Nutrition and the Economics of Swine Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 83-96, April.
    10. Govindasamy, Ramu & Liu, Donald J. & Kliebenstein, James B., 1993. "Impacts Of Pst On Optimal Production And Marketing Decisions Of A Grow-Finish Hog Farm Operation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, October.
    11. Leen, Frederik & Van den Broeke, Alice & Aluwé, Marijke & Lauwers, Ludwig & Millet, Sam & Van Meensel, Jef, 2018. "Stakeholder-driven modelling the impact of animal profile and market conditions on optimal delivery weight in growing-finishing pig production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 34-45.
    12. Meyer, Steven Roger, 1987. "The value of near infrared reflectance measurement of feedgrain nutrient composition," ISU General Staff Papers 1987010108000012708, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Hennessy, David A., 2006. "Feeding and the Equilibrium Feeder Animal Price-Weight Schedule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    15. Kuchler, Fred & McClelland, John, 1989. "Issues Raised by New Agricultural Technologies: Livestock Growth Hormones," Agricultural Economic Reports 308071, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Eswaramoorthy, K., 1991. "U.S. livestock production and factor demand: a multiproduct dynamic dual approach," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000010523, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Elisa Gatto & Guido Signorino, 2011. "Long-run relationship between crop-biodiversity and cereal production under the CAP reform: evidence from Italian regions," ERSA conference papers ersa11p964, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Mayer, D. G. & Belward, J. A. & Burrage, K., 1996. "Use of advanced techniques to optimize a multi-dimensional dairy model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 239-253.
    19. Min, Shi & Wang, Xiaobing & Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun, 2018. "The asymmetric response of farmers to an expected change in the price of rubber: The roles of sunk costs and path dependency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 585-594.
    20. Lawrence, John D. & Kaylen, Michael S., 1990. "Risk Management For Livestock Producers: Hedging And Contract Production," Staff Papers 13496, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.