IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/341552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic assessment of the state of livestock industry in Kazakhstan: prerequisites for the creation of a meat hub

Author

Listed:
  • Abdikerimova, Gulzhanar
  • Yesbolova, Ainur
  • Moldabekov, Bakytzhan
  • Kulanova, Darikul
  • Seidakhmetov, Marat

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to economically evaluate the condition of animal husbandry in the Republic of Kazakhstan and also to determine the necessity and possibility of the creation of an effective meat hub. Methodology / approach. The following methods were used: economic analysis and synthesis, comparison and analogy, systematization and generalization, factor analysis, institutional analysis, and modelling that helped identify problems of the livestock industry, and ways for its development. Results. The paper presents the results of the analysis of world and regional production and consumption of livestock and poultry; import and export of meat products in Asian countries, including Kazakhstan; the dynamics and structure of livestock in farms of different categories; the dynamics of gross income of livestock production of the republic; SWOT-analysis of efficiency of agricultural enterprises. Studying the meat market trends in the world and in the Republic of Kazakhstan, and also the dynamics of production and consumption of meat and meat products is a basis for argumentation when choosing strategically important measures on application of forms and ways of control, creation of the economic forecast, definition of the basic vectors of effective development of this industry in the long term taking into account influence of factors of various nature. Originality / scientific novelty. The study makes an original contribution by providing a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of the current state and future prospects of Kazakhstan’s livestock sector, while proposing innovative structural solutions through a specialised meat hub to improve productivity, quality and competitiveness. Practical value / implications. The study suggests the need to enhance meat production to meet domestic demand and boost exports. Achieving this involves innovating meat processing and sales, improving animal productivity through genetic advancements, enhancing infrastructure, and establishing livestock centres. Ongoing monitoring of the meat market is essential for crafting strategies to improve the livestock sector. Besides, creating a “meat hub” model will reduce investment and operational expenses for production units, streamline production based on set standards and consumer demand, enhance product liquidity, and augment income for small entrepreneurial forms.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdikerimova, Gulzhanar & Yesbolova, Ainur & Moldabekov, Bakytzhan & Kulanova, Darikul & Seidakhmetov, Marat, 2024. "Economic assessment of the state of livestock industry in Kazakhstan: prerequisites for the creation of a meat hub," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341552
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341552/files/2_Abdikerimova_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorraine Chapot & Louise Whatford & Polly Compston & Mehroosh Tak & Soledad Cuevas & Maria Garza & Houda Bennani & Hassaan Bin Aslam & Mathew Hennessey & Georgina Limon & Kevin Queenan & Guillaume Fou, 2021. "A Global Media Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chicken Meat Food Systems: Key Vulnerabilities and Opportunities for Building Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Dyck, John H. & Nelson, Kenneth E., 2003. "Structure Of The Global Markets For Meat," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33701, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Jablonski, B. B. R. & Schmit, T. M. & Kay, D., 2016. "Assessing the Economic Impacts of Food Hubs on Regional Economies: A Framework that Includes Opportunity Cost," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 143-172, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miljkovic, Dragan & Jin, Hyun, 2006. "Import Demand for Quality in the Japanese Beef Market," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 276-284, October.
    2. Victoria Morckel & Kathryn Colasanti, 2018. "Can Farmers’ Markets in Shrinking Cities Contribute to Economic Development? A Case Study from Flint, Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Davis, Christopher G. & Dyck, John, 2015. "Shocks to a Trading System: Northeast Asia Poultry Trade and Avian Influenza," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Roehlano M. Briones, 2013. "The Structure of Agricultural Trade Industry in Developing Countries," Trade Working Papers 23420, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    5. Shida Rastegari Henneberry & Joao E. Mutondo, 2009. "Agricultural Trade among NAFTA Countries: A Case Study of U.S. Meat Exports," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 424-445.
    6. Yoon, Jongyeol & Brown, Scott, 2017. "Examination of asymmetric supply response in the U.S. livestock industry," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252779, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Lopez, Jose Antonio & Malaga, Jaime E., 2009. "Estimation of a Censored Demand System in Stratified Sampling: An Analysis of Mexican Meat Demand at the Table Cut Level," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46294, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Hui-Shung Chang, 2007. "Overview of the World Broiler Industry: Implications for the Philippines," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 4(2), pages 67-82, December.
    9. Marilyn Sitaker & Jane Kolodinsky & Weiwei Wang & Lisa C. Chase & Julia Van Soelen Kim & Diane Smith & Hans Estrin & Zoe Van Vlaanderen & Lauren Greco, 2020. "Evaluation of Farm Fresh Food Boxes: A Hybrid Alternative Food Network Market Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Lopez, Jose Antonio & Malaga, Jaime E. & Chidmi, Benaissa & Belasco, Eric J. & Surles, James, 2012. "Mexican Meat Demand at the Table Cut Level: Estimating a Censored Demand System in a Complex Survey," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 43(2), pages 1-27.
    11. Karikallio, Hanna, 2015. "Cross-commodity Price Transmission and Integration of the EU Livestock Market of Pork and Beef: Panel Time-series Approach," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211832, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Clark, Jill K. & Jablonski, Becca B.R., 2022. "Managing across boundaries for coordinated local and regional food system policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Eaton, Derek J.F. & Bourgeois, J. & Achterbosch, Thom J., 2005. "Product differentiation under the WTO; An analysis of labelling and tariff or tax measures concerning farm animal welfare," Report Series 29123, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    14. Zsófia Benedek & Imre Fertő & Viktória Szente, 2020. "The Multiplier Effects of Food Relocalization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Becca B.R. Jablonski & Allison Bauman & Dawn Thilmany, 2021. "Local Food Market Orientation and Labor Intensity," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 916-934, September.
    16. Love, Erin & Thilmany McFadden, Dawn D. & Jablonski, Becca B. R. & Bellows, Laura, 2020. "A Baseline Assessment of School Food Spending and Local Procurement: Exploring the Case of CO Hb 19-1132 and Other Public Policies," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304588, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Gupta, Clare & Jablonski, Becca B.R., 2016. "Farm Impacts of Farm-to-Grocer Sales: The Case of Hawai’i," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Maureen Stickel & Steven Deller, 2020. "Local Foods and Local Economic Performance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 335-357, June.
    19. Becca B. R. Jablonski & Martha Sullins & Dawn Thilmany McFadden, 2019. "Community-Supported Agriculture Marketing Performance: Results from Pilot Market Channel Assessments in Colorado," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Fernianda Rahayu Hermiatin & Yuanita Handayati & Tomy Perdana & Dadan Wardhana, 2022. "Creating Food Value Chain Transformations through Regional Food Hubs: A Review Article," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:341552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.