IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/274539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Трирівневий Аналіз Функціонування Ринку Аграрного Страхування В Україні

Author

Listed:
  • Vilenchuk, Oleksandr

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to identify the current trends in the formation of agrarian insurance in Ukraine considering the potential of its development, taking into account the objective needs of agricultural producers in strengthening their insurance protection. Methodology / approach. The methodology of the presented research is based on the generally accepted principles of insurance relations formation in society. Integration of modern scientific views on the role of insurance in general and agrarian insurance in particular, testifies to the uniqueness and the indispensability of using this financial and economic tool in the process of counteraction and prevention of negative manifestations of the environmental risks. In the process of research, methods of induction and deduction were used – to form a holistic reflection of the key conditions for the functioning of the agrarian insurance market; methods of comparison, grouping, analysis and statistics – to identify current trends in the insurance relations development in the agrarian sector; the abstract-logical method contributed to the generalization of the author’s position regarding the further activation of the domestic market agrarian insurance. Results. The three-level analysis of the agrarian insurance national market functioning gives grounds to state that there are positive trends in the development of socio-economic relations between the participants in the insurance process. At the same time, issues concerning the expansion of the agricultural risk insurance coverage, possible sources of insurance payments diversification and the growth of insurance companies capitalization level remain to be still relevant. Originality / scientific novelty. The originality of the research is to use a three-level indicators’ analysis of the insurance market development in the segment of agrarian insurance. For the generalized diagnosis and identification of the patterns of development of insurance market, the study covered the ten-year period (2006–2016). The analysis of the territorial, sectoral and institutional levels of the insurance market functioning for agricultural products was carried out for the period of 2012–2016. The scientific novelty is to use a creative approach to analyze key indicators of agricultural insurance development in Ukraine. Practical value / implications. Practical value is determined by the development of author’s proposals, which are aimed at activating the business activity of the insurance market participants as the basis for balancing their existing insurance interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilenchuk, Oleksandr, 2018. "Трирівневий Аналіз Функціонування Ринку Аграрного Страхування В Україні," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 4(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:274539
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274539/files/2_Vilenchuk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Mahul & Charles J. Stutley, 2010. "Government Support to Agricultural Insurance : Challenges and Options for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2432.
    2. Fabio G. Santeramo & A. Ford Ramsey, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the EU: Lessons and Caution from the US," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(3), pages 34-39, December.
    3. Jisang Yu & Aaron Smith & Daniel A Sumner, 2018. "Effects of Crop Insurance Premium Subsidies on Crop Acreage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(1), pages 91-114.
    4. Ramsey, Austin Ford & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States," MPRA Paper 79164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Nathaniel Jensen & Christopher Barrett, 2017. "Agricultural Index Insurance for Development," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(2), pages 199-219.
    6. Shawn A. Cole & Wentao Xiong, 2017. "Agricultural Insurance and Economic Development," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 235-262, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio G., Santeramo & Ilaria, Russo & Emilia, Lamonaca, 2022. "Italian subsidised crop insurance: what the role of policy changes," MPRA Paper 115299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jørgensen, Sisse Liv & Termansen, Mette & Pascual, Unai, 2020. "Natural insurance as condition for market insurance: Climate change adaptation in agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Fabio G Santeramo, 2019. "I Learn, You Learn, We Gain Experience in Crop Insurance Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 284-304, June.
    4. Möhring, Niklas & Dalhaus, Tobias & Enjolras, Geoffroy & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Tappi, Marco & Nardone, Gianluca & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2022. "On the relationships among durum wheat yields and weather conditions: evidence from Apulia region, Southern Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    6. William M. Fonta & Safietou Sanfo & Abbi M. Kedir & Djiby R. Thiam, 2018. "Estimating farmers’ willingness to pay for weather index-based crop insurance uptake in West Africa: Insight from a pilot initiative in Southwestern Burkina Faso," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Quentin Stoeffler & Michael Carter & Catherine Guirkinger & Wouter Gelade, 2022. "The Spillover Impact of Index Insurance on Agricultural Investment by Cotton Farmers in Burkina Faso," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 36(1), pages 114-140.
    8. Jean Cordier & Fabio Santeramo, 2020. "Mutual Funds and the Income Stabilisation Tool in the EU: Retrospect and Prospects," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 53-58, April.
    9. Alice Bonou & Markus Olapade & Alessandra Garbero & Leonard Wantchekon, 2023. "Evaluation of the Effects of Introducing Risk Management Tools in Agricultural Development: The Case of PADAER Senegal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Williams Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Ashok K. Mishra, 2020. "Recent Advances in the Analyses of Demand for Agricultural Insurance in Developing and Emerging Countries," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 411-430, October.
    11. Azadeh Falsafian & Mohammad Ghahremanzadeh & Taravat Aref Eshghi & Vali Rasooli Sharabiani & Mariusz Szymanek & Agata Dziwulska-Hunek, 2024. "Producer Welfare Benefits of Rating Area Yield Crop Insurance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Yugang Ding & Cheng Sun, 2022. "Does agricultural insurance promote primary industry production? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in China," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(2), pages 434-459, April.
    13. Jean Cordier, 2017. "Critical issues for the implementation of a mutual fund compensating for production loss under Article 38 of Reg. (EU) No. 1305/2013," Post-Print hal-02786417, HAL.
    14. Mauro Vigani & Jonas Kathage, 2019. "To Risk or Not to Risk? Risk Management and Farm Productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 101(5), pages 1432-1454, October.
    15. Marco Rogna & Günter Schamel & Alex Weissensteiner, 2023. "Modelling the switch from hail insurance to antihail nets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 118-136, January.
    16. Shaolong Zeng & Bingying Qi & Minglin Wang, 2022. "Agricultural Insurance and Agricultural Economic Growth: The Case of Zhejiang Province in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Lichtenberg, Erik & Iglesias, Eva, 2022. "Index insurance and basis risk: A reconsideration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Ibrahima Sall & Russell Tronstad, 2021. "Simultaneous Analysis of Insurance Participation and Acreage Response from Subsidized Crop Insurance for Cotton," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Boyd, Chris M. & Bellemare, Marc F., 2022. "Why not insure prices? Experimental evidence from Peru," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 580-631.
    20. Ruggiero Rippo & Simone Cerroni, 2023. "Farmers' participation in the Income Stabilisation Tool: Evidence from the apple sector in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 273-294, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:274539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.