IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chicken Dumping In South Africa And The Long-Term Effects On Local Commercial Chicken Farming Industry: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Madibana, MJ
  • Fouche, CH
  • Manyeula, F

Abstract

The aim of this article is to highlight the effects of chicken dumping trade on South African local commercial chicken farming industry. The high cost of farming in South African has risen and this has created a fertile ground for overseas countries where chicken production costs are low to intensify their exports to South Africa for their excess chicken products at a lower price. South African chicken farmers are already facing domestic challenges which includes high-cost feed, high cost of importing chicken lines and resources to produce the meat chicken. A local single fertilised Ross 308 / Cobb 500 Fertile egg cost at least R2.50 ($0.12), whereas international, local breeders source these genetic lines at over a $1 an egg. Locally, there is persistent drought, chicken diseases, high electricity cost and electricity shortages (load shedding). These challenges inevitably raise costs of chicken production in South Africa whereas the US, Brazil and EU countries farming industries are highly subsidised and experience no high electricity costs or load shedding. In perspective, imported chicken from Brazil cost R9 per kg as compared to locally produced chicken at R25 per kg. To mitigate the chicken dumping trade, the South African government imposed legally sound chicken import tariffs of up to 62 %, however in August of 2022, the government suspended these tariffs due to rising food costs in the hope that the cheap dumped chicken would provide a relief to the financially stressed consumers. This move has raffled feathers within the local chicken farming sector which is struggling to sustain their farms due to stiff competition with the low-priced chicken, predominantly from Brazil and the US. More chicken farms in South Africa are shedding jobs. As of 2023, the poultry industry in South Africa employs an estimated total of 70,000 people, and others are questioning the sustainability of their enterprises going forward if the chicken dumping in the country is not controlled via stringent legislation that include appropriate dumping tariffs. This article suggests that both the chicken farming industry, the chicken importers and the government should hold regular dialogs to get common ground before the majority of local chicken farmers close shops due to chicken dumping. The regular engagements between the government and the chicken industry could avoid seemingly unilateral suspension of import tariffs. Subsidies that could absorb some of the operation cost, as is the case with US or Brazilian farmers should be introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Madibana, MJ & Fouche, CH & Manyeula, F, 2024. "Chicken Dumping In South Africa And The Long-Term Effects On Local Commercial Chicken Farming Industry: A Review," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 24(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340623
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340623/files/Madibana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aiguo Dai, 2013. "Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 52-58, January.
    2. Aiguo Dai, 2013. "Erratum: Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(2), pages 171-171, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilek Uz & Steven Buck, 2020. "Comparing Water Use Forecasting Model Selection Criteria: The Case of Commercial, Institutional, and Industrial Sector in Southern California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Ge, Yan & Cai, Ximing & Zhu, Tingju & Ringler, Claudia, 2016. "Drought frequency change: An assessment in northern India plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 111-121.
    3. Jinjia Wu & Jiansheng Qu & Hengji Li & Li Xu & Hongfen Zhang & Suman Aryal & Jingjing Zeng & Yujie Fan & Qin Wei & Xiafei Liu, 2018. "What Affects Chinese Residents’ Perceptions of Climate Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Jale Amanuel Dufera & Tewodros Addisu Yate & Tadesse Tujuba Kenea, 2023. "Spatiotemporal analysis of drought in Oromia regional state of Ethiopia over the period 1989 to 2019," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1569-1609, June.
    5. Meike Will & Jürgen Groeneveld & Karin Frank & Birgit Müller, 2021. "Informal risk-sharing between smallholders may be threatened by formal insurance: Lessons from a stylized agent-based model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Lingkui Meng & Ting Dong & Wen Zhang, 2016. "Drought monitoring using an Integrated Drought Condition Index (IDCI) derived from multi-sensor remote sensing data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1135-1152, January.
    7. Jianzhi Dong & Fangni Lei & Wade T. Crow, 2022. "Land transpiration-evaporation partitioning errors responsible for modeled summertime warm bias in the central United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Angels Niñerola & Ramon Ferrer-Rullan & Antoni Vidal-Suñé, 2020. "Climate Change Mitigation: Application of Management Production Philosophies for Energy Saving in Industrial Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Kumar Amrit & Rajendra P. Pandey & Surendra K. Mishra & Mihail Daradur, 2018. "Relationship of drought frequency and severity with range of annual temperature variation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 1199-1210, June.
    10. Zhixin Hao & Mengxin Bai & Danyang Xiong & Yang Liu & Jingyun Zheng, 2021. "The severe drought of 1876–1878 in North China and possible causes," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Brett A Bryan & Jianjun Huai & Jeff Connor & Lei Gao & Darran King & John Kandulu & Gang Zhao, 2015. "What Actually Confers Adaptive Capacity? Insights from Agro-Climatic Vulnerability of Australian Wheat," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Yi Yang & Beibei Liu & Peng Wang & Wei‐Qiang Chen & Timothy M. Smith, 2020. "Toward sustainable climate change adaptation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 318-330, April.
    13. Lei Zou & Jun Xia & Dunxian She, 2018. "Analysis of Impacts of Climate Change and Human Activities on Hydrological Drought: a Case Study in the Wei River Basin, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(4), pages 1421-1438, March.
    14. Avela Pamla & Gladman Thondhlana & Sheunesu Ruwanza, 2021. "Persistent Droughts and Water Scarcity: Households’ Perceptions and Practices in Makhanda, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Zare, Ehsan & Arshad, Maryam & Zhao, Dongxue & Nachimuthu, Gunasekhar & Triantafilis, John, 2020. "Two-dimensional time-lapse imaging of soil wetting and drying cycle using EM38 data across a flood irrigation cotton field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. L. Samaniego & R. Kumar & L. Breuer & A. Chamorro & M. Flörke & I. G. Pechlivanidis & D. Schäfer & H. Shah & T. Vetter & M. Wortmann & X. Zeng, 2017. "Propagation of forcing and model uncertainties on to hydrological drought characteristics in a multi-model century-long experiment in large river basins," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 435-449, April.
    17. Kaiqiang Bao & Haifeng Tian & Min Su & Liping Qiu & Xiaorong Wei & Yanjiang Zhang & Jian Liu & Hailong Gao & Jimin Cheng, 2019. "Stability of Ecosystem CO 2 Flux in Response to Changes in Precipitation in a Semiarid Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Jinhua Wen & Yian Hua & Chenkai Cai & Shiwu Wang & Helong Wang & Xinyan Zhou & Jian Huang & Jianqun Wang, 2023. "Probabilistic Forecast and Risk Assessment of Flash Droughts Based on Numeric Weather Forecast: A Case Study in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Kanwal, Vinita & Sirohi, Smita & Chand, Prem & Thakur, Arti, 2021. "Drought, Hunger and Malnutrition: Spatial and Socio-Economic Variations in the Desert State of India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315248, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Carpena, Fenella, 2019. "How do droughts impact household food consumption and nutritional intake? A study of rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 349-369.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.