IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/9478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research management of water economics in agriculture - an open agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Backeberg, G.R.

Abstract

It is indeed a privilege and an honour to deliver the FR Tomlinson Commemorative lecture this year. Although the invitation was quite unexpected, it is of course highly appreciated. When Prof Johann Kirsten phoned me with the request, I was initially not sure what topic I should address. The topic, which I have now formulated, is one which has fascinated me and certainly kept me busy for the most part of my career. I want to share with you some thoughts and perspectives, but will steer away from a laborious review or an abstract analysis. In doing so, I trust that this is appropriate within the spirit of the occasion, which is now a well established tradition in the Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA). Let me start with a quotation which is at the core of the theme I want to unfold in this lecture. Our most important resource is not land, nor capital and even less the climate. Our most important resource is not the gold under the earth's crust, or the oil that might be there. Our most important resource is our human material. We must develop our human material and make full use of it. (Groenewald JA, 1973a)

Suggested Citation

  • Backeberg, G.R., 2004. "Research management of water economics in agriculture - an open agenda," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 43(3), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:9478
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.9478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9478/files/43030357.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.9478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perret, Sylvain R. & Lavigne, M. & Stirer, N. & Yokwe, S. & Dikgale, K. S., 2003. "The Thabina Irrigation Scheme In A Context Of Rehabilitation And Management Transfer: Prospective Analysis And Local Empowerment," Working Papers 18071, University of Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development.
    2. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1956. "General Systems Theory--The Skeleton of Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 197-208, April.
    3. Rashid Hassan, 2003. "Economy-wide benefits from water-intensive industries in South Africa: Quasi-input-output analysis of the contribution of irrigation agriculture and cultivated plantations in the Crocodile River catch," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 171-195.
    4. Johnson, Glenn L., 1987. "Alternative Research Orientations For Agricultural Economists," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 26(3), October.
    5. Groenewald, J. A., 1973. "Modern Requirements for agricultural economic research," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 12(1), January.
    6. Charles K. Wilber & Robert S. Harrison, 1978. "The Methodological Basis of Institutional Economics: Pattern Model, Storytelling, and Holism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 61-89, March.
    7. Perret, S. & Lavigne, M. & Stirer, N. & Yokwe, S. & Dikgale, K. S., 2003. "The Thabina irrigation scheme in a context of rehabilitation and management transfer: prospective analysis and local empowerment. Final report. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Project number:," IWMI Research Reports H043097, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Groenewald, J. A., 1973. "A Review of the Quality of management in South African agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 12(2), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    2. M. N. Ahmed & R. W. Scapens, 2000. "Cost allocation in Britain: towards an institutional analysis," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 159-204.
    3. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    4. Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal & Franck Marle & Mathieu Dernis, 2021. "Modeling and Estimating Host Country Values in International Projects to Facilitate In-Country Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Gasper, D.R., 2007. "Problem- and policy-analysis for human development," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18743, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    6. George Kleiner, 2015. "State — Region — Field— Enterprise: Framework of Economics System Stability of Russia. Part 1," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 50-58.
    7. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.
    8. Zachary Sheaffer & Rita Mano‐Negrin, 2003. "Executives’ Orientations as Indicators of Crisis Management Policies and Practices," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 573-606, March.
    9. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    10. Davies, Andrew & Manning, Stephan & Söderlund, Jonas, 2018. "When neighboring disciplines fail to learn from each other: The case of innovation and project management research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 965-979.
    11. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "The making of heterodox microeconomics," MPRA Paper 30907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Justin Pence & Zahra Mohaghegh, 2020. "A Discourse on the Incorporation of Organizational Factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Key Questions and Categorical Review," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 1183-1211, June.
    13. Masechaba Nthunya & Nien-Tsu Tuan & Corrinne Shaw & Ian Jay, 2017. "A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 257-276, June.
    14. Ahmet Ilhan, 2020. "Comparison of Organizational Theory in the Axis of the "Pandemonium" Metaphor in Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Approaches," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(4), pages 292-304.
    15. Barile, Sergio & Carrubbo, Luca & Iandolo, Francesca & Caputo, Francesco, 2013. "From 'EGO' to 'ECO' in B2B relationships," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 6(4), pages 228-253.
    16. Jonathon Mackay & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz, 2023. "Disruptions, systems and individual agents—Exploring the intersections," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 43-60, January.
    17. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    18. Tacconi, Luca & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 1997. "Protected Area Assessment and Establishment in Vanuatu," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 118037.
    19. Andreas Hieronymi, 2013. "Understanding Systems Science: A Visual and Integrative Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 580-595, September.
    20. Krishna C. Prasad & Barbara Van Koppen & Kenneth Strzepek, 2006. "Equity and productivity assessments in the Olifants River basin, South Africa," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 63-75, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:9478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.