IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/267083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Demand For Bananas And The Economic Effect Of Supply Restriction

Author

Listed:
  • Chadwick, J. B.
  • Nieuwoudt, W. L.

Abstract

The wholesale demand elasticity of bananas was estimated at between -0,52 and -0,66 for the short run and between -0,65 and -0,71 for the long run. Estimates of demand elasticities using Time Varying Parameters varied between -0,62 and -0,93, also indicating that the demand becomes less price elastic during summer months. Retail elasticities were estimated at between -1,42 and -1,52 for the short run and at -1,79 for the long run. The social cost of the banana control programme is estimated at between 7,8 % and 12,68 % of income transfer between producers and consumers in marketing areas. The impact of cut-backs in banana production where entry is free (any farmer can produce bananas) is to increase prices in marketing areas, but depress prices in production areas. It is uncertain whether farm income can be increased significantly through such a scheme even though the demand is inelastic, if the supply of good banana land is not limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Chadwick, J. B. & Nieuwoudt, W. L., 1985. "The Demand For Bananas And The Economic Effect Of Supply Restriction," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 24(2), October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267083
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267083/files/agrekon-24-02-004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267083/files/agrekon-24-02-004.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Meulen, John, 1958. "The Demand for Bananas in the Sydney Wholesale Market," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(03), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Richardson, Robert A., 1976. "Structural Estimates Of Domestic Demand For Agricultural Products In Australia: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(03), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Bruce Gardner, 1983. "Efficient Redistribution through Commodity Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 225-234.
    4. Foote, Richard J., 1958. "Analytical Tools for Studying Demand and Price Structures," Technical Resources 316560, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    5. Nieuwoudt, W. L., 1977. "Seasonal Variations In Price, Production And Total Income Of Selected Horticultural Products," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 16(3), July.
    6. Aggrey-Mensah, W. & Guise, John W.B., 1969. "Seasonality in the Demand for Bananas," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 37(04), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richardson, Robert A., 1976. "Structural Estimates Of Domestic Demand For Agricultural Products In Australia: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(03), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Harvey, David R., 2003. "Policy Dependency And Reform: Economic Gains Versus Political Pains," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25865, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jerzy Michalek & Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs, 2014. "Capitalization of the Single Payment Scheme into Land Value: Generalized Propensity Score Evidence from the European Union," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(2), pages 260-289.
    4. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Lin, William W., 1986. "Effects Of Farm Commodity Programs: The Cases Of Corn And Rice," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278431, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Nathan P. Hendricks, 2022. "Would farmers benefit from removing more land from production in the next farm bill?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1139-1157, September.
    7. Harvey, David R., 2004. "Policy dependency and reform: economic gains versus political pains," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 265-275, December.
    8. E.J. Roberts, 1990. "The Demand for Meat: Part III," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 90-13, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    10. Pavel Ciaian & Tomáš Ratinger, 2009. "Income Distribution Effects of EU Rural Development Policies: The Case of Farm Investment Support," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2009_01, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    11. Bullock, D. S. & Salhofer, K., 1998. "Measuring the social costs of suboptimal combinations of policy instruments: A general framework and an example," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 249-259, May.
    12. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Banerjee, Anurag N. & Gorter, Harry de, 2001. "Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection: An econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 25-43, October.
    13. Harrison, Ian & Richardson, Bob, 1980. "Table and Manufacturing Quality Beef Cattle Price Relationships in Australia," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(03), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Jeff Alwang & Jaime Ortiz & George Norton, 1995. "Interacciones entre Políticas de Precios y Gastos en Investigación Agropecuaria," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 32(96), pages 199-216.
    15. Giannakas Konstantinos & Fulton Murray, 2003. "Costly (Dis)Agreement: Optimal Intervention, Income Redistribution, and Transfer Efficiency of Output Quotas in the Presence of Cheating," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Just, Richard E. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1984. "Uncertain economic environments and conditional policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0q33x98s, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    17. Bruce L. Benson & M. D. Faminow, 1986. "Regulatory Transfers in Canadian/American Agriculture: The Case of Supply Management," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 271-294, Spring/Su.
    18. Pavel Ciaian & D'Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "The Impact of the 2013 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy on Land Capitalization in the European Union," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 643-673.
    19. Grant, Warren R. & Moore, Donald S., 1970. "Alternative Government Rice Programs: An Economic Evaluation," Agricultural Economic Reports 307408, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Rausser, Gordon C., 1991. "Predatory versus productive government: the case of U.S. agricultural policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt21913950, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:267083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.