IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v4y2015p406-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The necessity of developing an innovation based culture in romanian agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra-Ioana Bucur

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Department of Agrifood and Environmental Economics)

Abstract

Currently, in terms of scientific fields, the European Union is based on the assimilation of existing technologies and mass production. This attitude does not correspond to today's world, characterized by economic globalization and a strong foreign competition. To maintain its economic position in the global context EU was forced to adapt and focus its efforts towards transition to a knowledge and innovation based society. The arguments offered throughout the paper showed a growing preoccupation with economic development based on knowledge and innovation. The present situation of the knowledge transfer market in Romanian agriculture was presented, emphasizing the challenges this market is currently facing. Bottom-up innovation was proposed as a solution to mitigate these problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra-Ioana Bucur, 2015. "The necessity of developing an innovation based culture in romanian agriculture," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4, pages 406-413.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:406-413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2015edition/file2015(46).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Attewell, 1992. "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fındık, Derya & Tansel, Aysit, 2013. "Resources on the stage: a firm level analysis of the ict adoption in Turkey," MPRA Paper 65956, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Aug 2014.
    2. Pavani Rangachari & Swapandeep S. Mushiana & Krista Herbert, 2021. "A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Abhay Nath Mishra & Ritu Agarwal, 2010. "Technological Frames, Organizational Capabilities, and IT Use: An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Procurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 249-270, June.
    4. Ashwin W. Joshi, 2017. "OEM implementation of supplier-developed component innovations: the role of supplier actions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 548-568, July.
    5. N. Elangovan, 2016. "Mediation of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on ERP Adoption in Industrial Cluster," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jesse Bockstedt & Alok Gupta, 2012. "Modeling Supply-Side Dynamics of IT Components, Products, and Infrastructure: An Empirical Analysis Using Vector Autoregression," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 397-417, June.
    7. Bendoly, Elliot, 2007. "Resource enablement modeling: Implications for studying the diffusion of technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 537-553, June.
    8. Haijun Bao & Xiaoting Zhu & Yingying Cen & Yi Peng & Jibin Xue, 2018. "Effects of Social Network on Human Capital of Land-Lost Farmers: A Study in Zhejiang Province," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 167-187, May.
    9. Harborne, Paul & Hendry, Chris, 2009. "Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3580-3595, September.
    10. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    11. Basaglia, Stefano & Caporarello, Leonardo & Magni, Massimo & Pennarola, Ferdinando, 2010. "IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 542-551.
    12. Chris Forman, 2005. "The Corporate Digital Divide: Determinants of Internet Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 641-654, April.
    13. Christopher J. Blackburn & Mallory E. Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Juan Moreno‐Cruz, 2020. "Do Pilot and Demonstration Projects Work? Evidence from a Green Building Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1132, September.
    14. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime & Palomas, Sergio, 2016. "Interdependences in the intrafirm diffusion of technological innovations: Confronting the rational and social accounts of diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 951-963.
    15. Christopher F Baum & Hans Lööf & Pardis Nabavi, 2019. "Innovation strategies, external knowledge and productivity growth," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 348-367, March.
    16. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Job Hopping, Information Technology Spillovers, and Productivity Growth," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 338-355, February.
    17. YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou & Nilesh Saraf, 2020. "Configurations for Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity with Digitization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1376-1397, December.
    18. Tomomi Hamada, 2019. "Determinants of Decision-Makers’ Attitudes toward Industry 4.0 Adaptation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Domenico Raucci & Dominique Lepore, 2020. "A Simplified Activity-Based Costing Approach for SMEs: The Case Study of an Italian Small Road Company," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 198-214.
    20. Xiong, Hang & Payne, Diane & Kinsella, Stephen, 2016. "Peer effects in the diffusion of innovations: Theory and simulation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:406-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.