IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i67p783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Intention to Use ChatGPT in Office Work in Romania: Between Utility and Hedonic Motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Catalina Turkes

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Aurelia-Felicia Stancioiu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Cristian-Silviu Banacu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

In the short evolution from 2019 to the present, the application domains of ChatGPT have experienced exponential growth, ranging from editing, consulting, banking, healthcare, journalism, and mass media to entertainment, education, and remote technical assistance in industrial processes. This innovative tool, specialised in generating and understanding texts, is capable of meet the needs of employees anywhere and at any time. The article investigates employees' perceptions regarding the use and utility of ChatGPT and identifies the factors underlying hedonic motivation and the intention to use ChatGPT in office work. Starting from this premise, the results obtained serve as a basis for building a new structural model. The online survey used aims to model data collected from 402 Romanian employees. PLS structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and multigroup analysis (PLS-MGA) helped test statistical hypotheses and validate the construct model. SmartPLS 4 and SPSS 28 software was used to process and analyse the data collected from employees. The results highlight the significant influence of factors (ease of use, utility, and hedonic motivators) on the behaviour of Romanian employees regarding the use of ChatGPT in office work.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Catalina Turkes & Aurelia-Felicia Stancioiu & Cristian-Silviu Banacu, 2024. "The Intention to Use ChatGPT in Office Work in Romania: Between Utility and Hedonic Motivation," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 783-783, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:67:p:783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3336.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronika Huta & Alan Waterman, 2014. "Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1425-1456, December.
    2. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    2. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    3. Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Poncin, Ingrid, 2015. "A valued agent: How ECAs affect website customers' satisfaction and behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 70-82.
    4. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Holmqvist, Jonas & Lunardo, Renaud, 2015. "The impact of an exciting store environment on consumer pleasure and shopping intentions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 117-119.
    6. Edith Pollet & Tatjana Schnell, 2017. "Brilliant: But What For? Meaning and Subjective Well-Being in the Lives of Intellectually Gifted and Academically High-Achieving Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1459-1484, October.
    7. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Retail shopper confusion: Conceptualization, scale development, and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3459-3467.
    8. Akram, Umair & Ansari, Aisha Rehman & ulhaq, Irfan & Yan, Chen, 2023. "Cosmetics makers have always sold ‘hope in a jar’! Understanding the cosmetics purchase intention in the Chinese mobile commerce environment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    9. Guo, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Kexin & Wang, Chaoyou, 2022. "Way to success: Understanding top streamer's popularity and influence from the perspective of source characteristics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Holmqvist, Jonas & Diaz Ruiz, Carlos & Peñaloza, Lisa, 2020. "Moments of luxury: Hedonic escapism as a luxury experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 503-513.
    11. Piotr Zaborek & Anna Kurzak Mabrouk, 2025. "The Role of Social and Environmental CSR in Shaping Purchase Intentions: Experimental Evidence from the Cosmetics Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Lacœuilhe, Jérôme & Louis, Didier & Lombart, Cindy, 2017. "Impacts of product, store and retailer perceptions on consumers’ relationship to terroir store brand," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 43-53.
    13. Fowler, Kendra & Bridges, Eileen, 2010. "Consumer innovativeness: Impact on expectations, perceptions, and choice among retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 492-500.
    14. Moriuchi, Emi & Takahashi, Ikuo, 2022. "The role of perceived value, trust and engagement in the C2C online secondary marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 76-88.
    15. Lisa Wagner & Fabian Gander & René T. Proyer & Willibald Ruch, 2020. "Character Strengths and PERMA: Investigating the Relationships of Character Strengths with a Multidimensional Framework of Well-Being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 307-328, April.
    16. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Mantok, Stanzin, 2021. "Mitigating the tension in pursuit of operational ambidexterity: The roles of knowledge development and bricolage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    17. Wagner, Tillmann & Rudolph, Thomas, 2010. "Towards a hierarchical theory of shopping motivation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 415-429.
    18. Merrick Powell & Kirk N. Olsen & William Forde Thompson, 2023. "Music, Pleasure, and Meaning: The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motivations for Music (HEMM) Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Mijeong Noh & Rodney C Runyan & Jon Mosier, 2017. "Hedonic/Utilitarian Cool Attitudes: A Comparison of Young Female and Male Consumers," Current Trends in Fashion Technology & Textile Engineering, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 1(1), pages 1-2, October.
    20. Se Ran Yoo & Suk Won Lee & Hyeon Mo Jeon, 2020. "The Role of Customer Experience, Food Healthiness, and Value for Revisit Intention in GROCERANT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ChatGPT; motivation; perception; utility; behavioural intention; non-probabilistic sampling with partial least squares (PLS-SEM); multigroup analysis (PLS-MGA);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management
    • M55 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Contracting Devices
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:67:p:783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.