IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v13y2011i30p620-631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Model of Designing an Organizational Structure in a Knowledge Based Society

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Vărzaru

    (Universitatea din Craiova, Craiova, România)

  • Eric Jolivet

    (Toulouse Graduate School of Management, Toulouse, France)

Abstract

The role of the manager in the knowledge society is to lead, in a productive and cost effective manner, a system that is at the crossroads of three worlds: the environment, the human and the organization. To ensure the continuity of the organization, the manager must choose an appropriate structure that would enable it to increase productivity, improve quality of goods and maintain the motivation, satisfaction and involvement of the human factor. Changes promoted by the influences of organizational theories and knowledge management have resulted in reducing the emergence of hierarchical levels, formal control, in a low degree of formalization in general and in the emergence of deconstructed forms. The concept of organizational design is promoted by structuring the organization and seeks to ensure consistency among strategy, structure and incentive systems of the organization, an idea which also represents the basis of the organizational perspective imposed by Mintzberg(1990). This paper builds upon the three main theories that have influenced the design of organizational structure and proposes an integrated model that takes into account the changes promoted by knowledge management and aims at satisfying human resources quantification.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Vărzaru & Eric Jolivet, 2011. "Towards a Model of Designing an Organizational Structure in a Knowledge Based Society," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 620-631, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:13:y:2011:i:30:p:620-631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_1068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3163 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eric Godelier, 2003. "Alfred Chandler : un historien de la gestion des ressources humaines," Post-Print hal-00262679, HAL.
    3. Walsham, Geoff, 2001. "Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 599-608, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. & Chini, Tina Claudia, 2003. "Knowledge transfer between marketing functions in multinational companies: a conceptual model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 215-232, April.
    2. Mike Bartholomaei, 2005. "To Know is to Be: Three Perspectives on the Codification of Knowledge," SPRU Working Paper Series 131, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin & Michel Grundstein & Elsa Negre & Camille Rosenthal-Sabroux, 2013. "Formalizing an empirical model: a way to enhance the communication between users and designers," Post-Print hal-01499678, HAL.
    4. Fahmi Ibrahim & Noor Maya Salleh, 2019. "Embedding Knowledge Management Theory in Learning and Teaching Approach," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 19-40, March.
    5. Venters, Will, 2010. "Knowledge management technology-in-practice: a social constructionist analysis of the introduction and use of knowledge management systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29839, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    7. Ferguson, Julie & Huysman, Marleen & Soekijad, Maura, 2010. "Knowledge Management in Practice: Pitfalls and Potentials for Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1797-1810, December.
    8. Alistair Mutch, 2010. "Technology, Organization, and Structure---A Morphogenetic Approach," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 507-520, April.
    9. Simon French & David Rios Insua & Fabrizio Ruggeri, 2007. "e -Participation and Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 211-226, December.
    10. Mohsin Bashir & Muhammad Waseem Bari & Syed Hassan Raza, 2018. "Dimensions of Social Capital and Innovation Capabilities of Firms The Performance of Information Technology as a Mediator," Global Social Sciences Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(3), pages 175-192, September.
    11. Danming Lin & Qiang Liang & Zongling Xu & Runtian Li & Weimin Xie, 2008. "Does knowledge management matter for information technology applications in China?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 489-507, September.
    12. Williams, Christopher & Du, Juana & Zhang, Hongzhong, 2020. "International orientation of Chinese internet SMEs: Direct and indirect effects of foreign and indigenous social networking site use," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    13. Kaufmann, A. & Lehner, P. & Todtling, F., 2003. "Effects of the Internet on the spatial structure of innovation networks," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 402-424, September.
    14. Wen-Bao Lin, 2013. "Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 151-166, January.
    15. Chris Kimble, 2013. "What Cost Knowledge Management? The Example of Infosys," Post-Print halshs-00826906, HAL.
    16. Nicholas M. Short & M. Jennifer Woodward-Greene & Michael D. Buser & Daniel P. Roberts, 2023. "Scalable Knowledge Management to Meet Global 21st Century Challenges in Agriculture," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01292702, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    structure; organizational design; knowledge management; contingency; model; approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:13:y:2011:i:30:p:620-631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.