IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aaw/grrjrn/v5y2020i1p376-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship of Principals Academic Decision-Making Practices with Faculty Morale: A Study of Colleges in Punjab

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Nadeem Shahzad

    (PhD Scholar, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore (Okara Campus), Punjab, Pakistan.)

  • Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi

    (Associate Professor, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore (Okara Campus), Punjab, Pakistan.)

  • Waqar Ali

    (PhD Scholar, Department of Education, University of Education Lahore (Okara Campus), Punjab, Pakistan.)

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between principals academic decision-making practices and faculty morale. A descriptive survey study has been adopted. The population of the study comprised all the faculty members working in public sector colleges of Punjab, province of Pakistan. Two questionnaires based on five-point Likert Scale, namely Academic Decision-Making Practices (ADMP) questionnaire to measure practices was adopted by the principals and Faculty Morale Scale (FMS) to measure morale of teaching faculty. The collected data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, correlation coefficient and linear regression model. A positive significant relationship between principals academic decision making practices and morale of faculty members was found. Some academic decision-making practices like decisions based on policy matter, promote academic development, power delegation, employees participation collect information and planning are significantly correlated with morale of faculty. While, some practices such as diplomacy and use rules to suit themselves do not correlate with morale.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Nadeem Shahzad & Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi & Waqar Ali, 2020. "Relationship of Principals Academic Decision-Making Practices with Faculty Morale: A Study of Colleges in Punjab," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 5(1), pages 376-385, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:376-385
    DOI: 10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://grrjournal.com/jadmin/Auther/31rvIolA2LALJouq9hkR/AzVnTscqpL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.grrjournal.com/issue/relationship-of-principals-academic-decisionmaking-practices-with-faculty-morale-a-study-of-colleges-in-punjab
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31703/grr.2020(V-I).41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladimir Masch, 2004. "Return to the “natural” process of decision-making leads to good strategies," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 431-462, October.
    2. Hervé Laroche, 1995. "From Decision to Action in Organizations: Decision-Making as a Social Representation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 62-75, February.
    3. Ozer, Muammer, 2005. "Factors which influence decision making in new product evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 784-801, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serdukov, Svetlana, 2012. "From the chaos of transition economy to “normalized” managerial practices: The role of group interaction in creating meaning in managerial work," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 17(4), pages 423-444.
    2. Matuschek, Ingo & Kleemann, Frank, 2019. "Konzertierte Verunsicherung angesichts Industrie 4.0 - Herausforderungen für die betriebliche Sozialpartnerschaft [Concerted uncertainty in the face of industry 4.0 - challenges for codeterminatio," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 26(2), pages 189-206.
    3. de Groot, I. Manon & Antonides, Gerrit & Read, Daniel & Raaij, W. Fred van, 2009. "The effects of direct experience on consumer product evaluation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 509-518, June.
    4. Raffaella Coppier & Francesca Grassetti & Elisabetta Michetti, 2021. "Non-compliant behaviour in public procurement: an evolutionary model with endogenous monitoring," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(1), pages 459-483, June.
    5. Yu-Jing Chiu & Yi-Chung Hu & Chia-Yin Yao & Chia-Hung Yeh, 2022. "Identifying Key Risk Factors in Product Development Projects," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Ibtissem Hamouda & Damien Talbot, 2018. "Contenu et effets de la proximité institutionnelle : un cas d’enfermement dans l’industrie aéronautique," Post-Print hal-02329612, HAL.
    7. G Montibeller & L A Franco, 2011. "Raising the bar: strategic multi-criteria decision analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(5), pages 855-867, May.
    8. Patriotta, Gerardo & Spedale, Simona, 2011. "Micro-interaction dynamics in group decision making: Face games, interaction order and boundary work," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 362-374.
    9. Coget, Jean-Francois & Haag, Christophe & Gibson, Donald E., 2011. "Anger and fear in decision-making: The case of film directors on set," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 476-490.
    10. Ozer, Muammer, 2011. "Understanding the impacts of product knowledge and product type on the accuracy of intentions-based new product predictions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 359-369, June.
    11. Vladimir A. Masch, 2013. "Extensions of stochastic multiscenario models for long-range planning under uncertainty," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 43-59, March.
    12. Florence Allard-Poesi, 1998. "Representations And Influence Processes In Groups: Towards A Socio-Cognitive Perspective On Cognition In Organization," Post-Print hal-01490579, HAL.
    13. Vladimir A. Masch, 2017. "¡°Shifting the Paradigm¡± in Superintelligence," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 8, pages 17-30, May.
    14. Olariu Ana Alexandra & Breazu Andreea & Popa Ștefan Cătălin & Popa Cătălina Florentina & Căruceru Nicoleta, 2024. "Decision-Making in Healthcare. A Bibliometric Exploration," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 3242-3254.
    15. Sander Merkus & Marcel Veenswijk, 2017. "Turning New Public Management theory into reality: Performative struggle during a large scale planning process," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(7), pages 1264-1284, November.
    16. Emmanuelle Reynaud, 2001. "Vers une meilleure compréhension des décisions stratégiques:l'apport de la méthode des scénarios," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 4(2), pages 183-214, March.
    17. Ozer, Muammer, 2007. "Reducing the demand uncertainties at the fuzzy-front-end of developing new online services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1372-1387, November.
    18. Michele Franco & Cida Sanches, 2016. "Influence of Emotions on Decision-Making," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(1), pages 40-62, January.
    19. Ivana Ilijašić Veršić, 2018. "Organisational Decision-Making and Academic Institutions: Increasing Complexity of Processes, Settings and Actors," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 37-46, May.
    20. Jha, Aditya & Fernandes, Kiran & Xiong, Yu & Nie, Jiajia & Agarwal, Neelesh & Tiwari, Manoj K., 2017. "Effects of demand forecast and resource sharing on collaborative new product development in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 207-221.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Academic Decision Making; Practices; Morale; Principals; Faculty; Colleges.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aaw:grrjrn:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:376-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Imran Khan The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask M Imran Khan to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.humanityonly.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.