IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/inm/orisre/v10y1999i2p167-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Avgerou, Chrisanthi & McGrath, Kathy, 2007. "Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2353, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  2. Gebauer, Judith & Schober, Franz, 2005. "Information System Flexibility and the Performance of Business Processes," Working Papers 05-0112, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
  3. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
  4. Tilson, David & Sørensen, Carsten & Lyytinen, Kalle J., 2021. "Digitally induced industry paradoxes: disruptive innovations of taxiwork and music streaming beyond organizational boundaries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106676, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  5. Sepideh Ebrahimi & Kamran Eshghi, 2022. "A meta-analysis of the factors influencing the impact of security breach announcements on stock returns of firms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2357-2380, December.
  6. Nicholas Berente & Youngjin Yoo, 2012. "Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Postimplementation of NASA's Enterprise Information System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 376-396, June.
  7. V. S. Prakash Attili & Saji K. Mathew & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2022. "Information Privacy Assimilation in IT Organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1497-1513, October.
  8. Rajiv Kohli & Sarv Devaraj, 2003. "Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 127-145, June.
  9. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Vladislav V. Fomin & Stefan Haefliger & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 755-773, September.
  10. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
  11. M. N. Ravishankar & Shan L. Pan & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2011. "Examining the Strategic Alignment and Implementation Success of a KMS: A Subculture-Based Multilevel Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 39-59, March.
  12. Jackson, Stephen & Philip, George, 2010. "A techno-cultural emergence perspective on the management of techno-change," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 445-456.
  13. J-R Córdoba, 2008. "The Javeriana Case: Systems Thinking, Power and Ethics in IS (and OR?) Strategy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 721-724, May.
  14. Tobias Wuttke & Thomas Haskamp & Michael Perscheid & Falk Uebernickel, 2024. "Building the Processes Behind the Product: How Digital Ventures Create Business Processes That Support Their Growth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 565-583, October.
  15. Ágnes Szukits & Péter Móricz, 2024. "Towards data-driven decision making: the role of analytical culture and centralization efforts," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2849-2887, October.
  16. Gerald C. Kane & Maryam Alavi, 2007. "Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 796-812, October.
  17. Elena Mazurova & Willem Standaert & Esko Penttinen & Felix Ter Chian Tan, 2022. "Paradoxical Tensions Related to AI-Powered Evaluation Systems in Competitive Sports," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 897-922, June.
  18. Saggi Nevo & Michael Wade & Wade D. Cook, 2010. "An empirical study of IT as a factor of production: The case of Net-enabled IT assets," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 323-335, July.
  19. Margunn Aanestad & Bob Jolliffe & Arunima Mukherjee & Sundeep Sahay, 2014. "Infrastructuring Work: Building a State-Wide Hospital Information Infrastructure in India," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 834-845, December.
  20. Robert Wayne Gregory & Mark Keil & Jan Muntermann & Magnus Mähring, 2015. "Paradoxes and the Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 57-80, March.
  21. Brian S. Butler, 2001. "Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 346-362, December.
  22. Addo, Atta A., 2016. "Explaining 'irrationalities' of IT-enabled change in a developing country bureaucracy: the case of Ghana's Tradenet," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 69471, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  23. Denolf, Janne.M. & Wognum, Nel P.M. & Trienekens, Jacques H. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), 2012. "Towards a Supply-Chain Instrument to Monitor an Information Technology Implementation," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144968, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  24. Öbrand, Lars & Holmström, Jonny & Newman, Mike, 2018. "Navigating Rumsfeld's quadrants: A performative perspective on IT risk management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-8.
  25. Olga Volkoff & Diane M. Strong & Michael B. Elmes, 2007. "Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 832-848, October.
  26. Qi Deng & Shaobo Ji, 2015. "Organizational Green IT Adoption: Concept and Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
  27. Khuong, Le-Nguyen & Harindranath, G. & Dyerson, Romano, 2014. "Understanding knowledge management software-organisation misalignments from an institutional perspective: A case study of a global IT-management consultancy firm," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 226-247.
  28. Oesterreich, Thuy Duong & Teuteberg, Frank, 2019. "Behind the scenes: Understanding the socio-technical barriers to BIM adoption through the theoretical lens of information systems research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 413-431.
  29. Yi-Da Chen & Susan A. Brown & Paul Jen-Hwa Hu & Chwan-Chuen King & Hsinchun Chen, 2011. "Managing Emerging Infectious Diseases with Information Systems: Reconceptualizing Outbreak Management Through the Lens of Loose Coupling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 447-468, September.
  30. Kun Shin Im & Varun Grover & James T. C. Teng, 2013. "Research Note---Do Large Firms Become Smaller by Using Information Technology?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 470-491, June.
  31. Spanjers, R., 2012. "Be patient : A longitudinal study on adoption and diffusion of information technology innovation in Dutch healthcare," Other publications TiSEM 594c1680-fb6d-4396-aaf6-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.