IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/gamebe/v71y2011i2p487-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Equilibrium play in matches: Binary Markov games

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Rabah Amir, 2020. "Special Issue: Supermodularity and Monotonicity in Economics," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 907-911, November.
  2. Banerjee, Anurag N. & Markovich, Sarit & Seccia, Giulio, 2019. "The endgame," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 176-192.
  3. Oscar Volij & Casilda Lasso de la Vega, 2016. "The Value Of A Draw In Quasi-Binary Matches," Working Papers 1601, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
  4. Leonidas Spiliopoulos, 2018. "Randomization and serial dependence in professional tennis matches: Do strategic considerations, player rankings and match characteristics matter?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(5), pages 413-427, September.
  5. Gonzalez-Cabrera Ivan & Herrera Diego Dario & González Diego Luis, 2020. "Generalized model for scores in volleyball matches," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 41-55, March.
  6. AMIR, Rabah, 2001. "Stochastic games in economics and related fields: an overview," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2001060, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  7. Loertscher, Simon, 2013. "Rock–Scissors–Paper and evolutionarily stable strategies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 473-474.
  8. Kocher, Martin G. & Lenz, Marc V. & Sutter, Matthias, 2010. "Psychological Pressure in Competitive Environments: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment: Comment," IZA Discussion Papers 4846, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  9. González-Díaz, Julio & Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio, 2016. "Cognitive performance in competitive environments: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 40-52.
  10. Kassis, Mark & Schmidt, Sascha L. & Schreyer, Dominik & Sutter, Matthias, 2021. "Psychological pressure and the right to determine the moves in dynamic tournaments – evidence from a natural field experiment," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 278-287.
  11. Martin G. Kocher & Marc V. Lenz & Matthias Sutter, 2012. "Psychological Pressure in Competitive Environments: New Evidence from Randomized Natural Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(8), pages 1585-1591, August.
  12. Bradley J. Ruffle & Oscar Volij, 2012. "First-Mover Advantage In Two-Sided Competitions: An Experimental Comparison Of Role-Assignment Rules," Working Papers 1208, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
  13. Feng, Yue & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2020. "Strategic complements in two stage, 2 × 2 games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
  14. Paserman, M. Daniele, 2023. "Gender Differences in Performance in Competitive Environments? Evidence from Professional Tennis Players," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 590-609.
  15. Anurag N. Banerjee & Sarit Markovich & Giulio Seccia, 2016. "The Endgame," Working Papers 1601, Nazarbayev University, Department of Economics.
  16. Sang-Hyop Lee & Sumner La Croix, 2014. "Does Versatility Matter in Match-Play Sports? Evidence from Sumo Wrestling," Working Papers 201411, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Economics.
  17. Axel Anderson & Jeremy Rosen & John Rust & Kin-Ping Wong, 2021. "Disequilibrium Play in Tennis," Working Papers gueconwpa~21-21-07, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
  18. Emara, Noha & Owens, David & Smith, John & Wilmer, Lisa, 2017. "Serial correlation in National Football League play calling and its effects on outcomes," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 125-132.
  19. Romain Gauriot & Lionel Page, 2019. "Does Success Breed Success? a Quasi-Experiment on Strategic Momentum in Dynamic Contests," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(624), pages 3107-3136.
  20. Bradley J. Ruffle & Oscar Volij, 2016. "First-mover advantage in best-of series: an experimental comparison of role-assignment rules," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 45(4), pages 933-970, November.
  21. González-Díaz, Julio & Gossner, Olivier & Rogers, Brian W., 2012. "Performing best when it matters most: Evidence from professional tennis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 767-781.
  22. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:5:p:413-427 is not listed on IDEAS
  23. Bizzozero, Paolo & Flepp, Raphael & Franck, Egon, 2016. "The importance of suspense and surprise in entertainment demand: Evidence from Wimbledon," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 47-63.
  24. Yue Feng & Tarun Sabarwal, 2020. "Dynamic strategic complements in two stage, 2x2 games," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202006, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
  25. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Oscar Volij, 2020. "The value of a draw," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 1023-1044, November.
  26. Shih-Hsun Hsu & Chen-Ying Huang & Cheng-Tao Tang, 2007. "Minimax Play at Wimbledon: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 517-523, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.