IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/intorg/v52y1998i04p855-885_44.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Felix Heiduk, 2015. "What is in a name? Germany’s strategic partnerships with Asia’s rising powers," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 131-146, June.
  2. Raffaella A. Del Sarto, 2016. "Normative Empire Europe: The European Union, its Borderlands, and the ‘Arab Spring’," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 215-232, March.
  3. Tanja E. Aalberts, 2005. "Sovereignty Reloaded? A Constructivist Perspective on European Research," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0010, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
  4. Mukand, Sharun W. & Rodrik, Dani, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1163, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  5. Hoyoon Jung, 2019. "The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
  6. Hainmueller, Jens & Hiscox, Michael J., 2006. "Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 469-498, April.
  7. Christian Kaunert & Sarah Leonard & Ori Wertman, 2022. "Securitization of COVID-19 as a Security Norm: WHO Norm Entrepreneurship and Norm Cascading," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, June.
  8. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:709-736 is not listed on IDEAS
  9. Elliott Ash & Sharun Mukand & Dani Rodrik, 2021. "Economic Interests, Worldviews, and Identities: Theory and Evidence on Ideational Politics," NBER Working Papers 29474, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  10. Jason Blazevic, 2010. "The Taiwan Dilemma: China, Japan, and the Strait Dynamic," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 39(4), pages 143-173.
  11. Resnick, Danielle & Babu, Suresh Chandra & Haggblade, Steven & Hendriks, Sheryl & Mather, David, 2015. "Conceptualizing drivers of policy change in agriculture, nutrition, and food security: The kaleidoscope model:," IFPRI discussion papers 1414, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  12. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
  13. Kaminski Joseph Jon, 2019. "Rethinking Realism and Constructivism Through the Lenses of Themes and Ontological Primacy," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 25(85), pages 6-29, November.
  14. Duffy Gavan, 2002. "Language Analysis for Peace Science," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 95-118, July.
  15. Sreya Maitra Roychoudhury, 2014. "State Securitization and Internal Ethnic Conflicts in India: Re-examining the Punjab Crisis," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 18(2), pages 155-173, December.
  16. Di Tella, Rafael & Dubra, Juan, 2008. "Crime and punishment in the "American Dream"," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 1564-1584, July.
  17. Roxana Bobulescu, 2011. "Critical Realism versus Social Constructivism in International Relations," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 37-64, May.
  18. Rodrik, Dani & Mukand, Sharun, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas: On Ideas versus Interests in Policymaking," CEPR Discussion Papers 12820, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  19. Eero Palmujoki, 2009. "Global principles for sustainable biofuel production and trade," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 135-151, May.
  20. Yakub Halabi, 2006. "US Responses to Major Developments in the Arab-Islamic World," International Studies, , vol. 43(4), pages 339-365, October.
  21. Daniel Berliner & Aseem Prakash, 2014. "The United Nations Global Compact: An Institutionalist Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 217-223, June.
  22. Dani Rodrik, 2014. "When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(1), pages 189-208, Winter.
  23. Paul J. Stephenson, 2010. "The Role of Working Groups of Commissioners in Co‐ordinating Policy Implementation: The Case of Trans‐European Networks (TENs)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 709-736, June.
  24. Evi Fitriani, 2011. "Asian perceptions about the EU in the Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM)," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 43-56, November.
  25. Peter Utting & Ann Zammit, 2009. "United Nations-Business Partnerships: Good Intentions and Contradictory Agendas," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 39-56, May.
  26. Mark Beeson, 2014. "Security in Asia," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 1(1), pages 1-23, April.
  27. Ambrosino, Angela & Fiori, Stefano, 2017. "How Can Formal Norms Change Informal Norms? Douglass North’s Approach to Ideologies and Institutional Change," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201707, University of Turin.
  28. Fozia Bibi & Sumbal Jameel & Syed Umair Jalal, 2018. "What is Democracy? Challenges for Democracy in Pakistan," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(1), pages 66-75, June.
  29. Benjamin Zyla, 2018. "Beyond the 2% fetishism: studying the practice of collective action in transatlantic affairs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, December.
  30. Glen Whelan & Jeremy Moon & Marc Orlitzky, 2009. "Human Rights, Transnational Corporations and Embedded Liberalism: What Chance Consensus?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 367-383, August.
  31. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:195-218 is not listed on IDEAS
  32. James D. Fielder, 2022. "Ghosts of the Titanomachy: Structure, Commitment, Economics, and Risk as Causal Mechanisms in an Online Battle," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 53(3), pages 265-284, June.
  33. Matthias Hofferberth, 2016. "“Confusion is a fundamental state of mind”—On the peculiar intellectual career of global governance in international relations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, December.
  34. Jayati Srivastava & Ananya Sharma, 2014. "International Relations Theory and World Order," South Asian Survey, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 20-34, March.
  35. Nicole V.T. Lugosi, 2012. "Beyond constructivism: expanding the boundaries of international relations theory," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 3(1), pages 122-127, July.
  36. Ian Marsh, 2001. "Can the Political System Sustain the Strategic Conversations Australia Needs?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 26(1_suppl), pages 153-170, August.
  37. Fozia Bibi & Sumbal Jameel & Syed Umair Jalal, 2018. "What is Democracy? Challenges for Democracy in Pakistan," Global Political Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(1), pages 66-75, June.
  38. Mukand, Sharun W. & Rodrik, Dani, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 370, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
  39. Shenkar Oded & Arikan Ilgaz, 2010. "Business as International Politics: Drawing Insights from Nation-State to Inter-Firm Alliances," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-33, January.
  40. Shibashis Chatterjee, 2014. "Western Theories and the non-Western World," South Asian Survey, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 1-19, March.
  41. Flesken, Anaïd, 2014. "Researching Ethnic Relations as the Outcome of Political Processes," GIGA Working Papers 251, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
  42. Giovanni Agostinis, 2014. "Constructing regionalism in South America: the cases of transport infrastructure and energy within UNASUR," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0393, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
  43. Michael A. Witt, 2019. "De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(7), pages 1053-1077, September.
  44. Robert J. Hanlon, 2017. "Thinking about the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Can a China-Led Development Bank Improve Sustainability in Asia?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 541-554, September.
  45. Han, Xia & Lukoianove, Tatiana & Zhao, Shasha & Liu, Xiaohui, 2024. "International relations in international business research: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  46. Dong-Joon Jo & Erik Gartzke, 2007. "Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(1), pages 167-194, February.
  47. Shibashis Chatterjee, 2005. "Ethnic Conflicts in South Asia," South Asian Survey, , vol. 12(1), pages 75-89, March.
  48. Frederick Kliem, 2020. "Why Quasi-Alliances Will Persist in the Indo-Pacific? The Fall and Rise of the Quad," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 7(3), pages 271-304, December.
  49. Ruggie, John Gerard, 2004. "Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors and Practices," Working Paper Series rwp04-031, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  50. Wolfe, Robert, 2010. "Endogenous Learning and Consensual Understanding in Multilateral Negotiations: Arguing and Bargaining in the WTO," Working Papers 90885, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.